2.2L Performance Tech 16 valve 143 hp EcoTec with 150 lb-ft of torque

2.2 Oil catch can, more of cleaning up then performance!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2017, 02:29 PM
  #41  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Oldblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-2011
Location: Welland,Ont Canada
Posts: 36,502
Well that didn't take long, in my OCD mind, I can't wait for things to happen, so I took a highway run from home up to Lake Ontario, then along another highway 45 miles and then back, all at the exact speed limit, really officer, so about 110 miles total , and finally squint hard at the dirty line and there is so condensation getting sucked up to the tank.
Attached Thumbnails 2.2 Oil catch can, more of cleaning up then performance!-img_0345.jpg  
Oldblue is offline  
Old 02-06-2017, 02:33 PM
  #42  
Moderator
 
RJ_RS_SS_350's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-01-2014
Location: California
Posts: 7,806
By the time you get enough in there to be a freeze problem, it won't be cold anymore!
RJ_RS_SS_350 is offline  
Old 02-06-2017, 02:35 PM
  #43  
RF2
Senior Member
 
RF2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-14-2012
Location: Washington P/L
Posts: 198
Just a thought. If you put the PCV line after the throttle plate you will have full vacuum, but you are feeding air down stream of the MAS. This might lean out your idle and give you a code.
How you have the system set up is correct. At idle you will not have much blow by.
RF2 is offline  
Old 02-06-2017, 04:29 PM
  #44  
Platinum Member
 
firemangeorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-06-2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 11,097
Originally Posted by RF2
Just a thought. If you put the PCV line after the throttle plate you will have full vacuum, but you are feeding air down stream of the MAS. This might lean out your idle and give you a code.
How you have the system set up is correct. At idle you will not have much blow by.
This ^

You wouldn't want to hook a full vacuum source line to an open vented space like the engine block. That would just pull in a constant flow of air and lean out the intake fuel mix. Would be the same as a bad vacuum leak.
Vacuum lines are generally plugged into a closed container with a diaphram.
Examble. brake booster, heater control valves, damper door switches etc.
(just generic examples. some of those aren't on the HHR's )
firemangeorge is online now  
Old 02-06-2017, 05:46 PM
  #45  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Oldblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-2011
Location: Welland,Ont Canada
Posts: 36,502
Or the system with positive vacuum from under the throttle body has to have a pcv valve


Oldblue is offline  
Old 02-07-2017, 11:54 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Cat Man HHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-2010
Location: Lake Ronkonkoma, N.Y.
Posts: 3,564
Blue
I think you over are thinking this. Your original vent hose went from valve cover to clean side of intake pipe. There will be always be a vacuum under running conditions, some times greater. If there wasn't your engine wouldn't run.
Here's a home made oil separator I made for my 2013 Challenger when I had it. It was a 3.6, went from the same locations you have. I know doesn't show you a lot.

Name:  SDC10505_zps24fd7ad8.jpg
Views: 1164
Size:  77.6 KB

This can was built out of a primary fuel filter for a diesel engine, but the top was cut off so I could put a membrane inside it and then I epoxied a lid on top. And it did collect oil. I only had 6K on the car when I turned it in for my SS.
The can is not mounted low, in fact it was on the strut tower above the two ports it was connected to.
Your can will work. It just needs an element inside it.

As far as the PCV, it's a restricted vacuum port not a check valve. It still draws vapors just like the hose you have on your engine.
Cat Man HHR is offline  
Old 02-07-2017, 02:05 PM
  #47  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Oldblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-2011
Location: Welland,Ont Canada
Posts: 36,502
I stated earlier, I want to keep it simple, I'm not suggesting I change anything, therefore not over thinking the setup. I don't want a pvc system like the 2.0 turbo SS has, I just want to catch any oil or condensation in the separator tank and keep that slop out of my throttle body. It's working just fine as I posted in #41.
I did this as an experiment in the same vein I have built Oldblue, with gently used or inexpensive parts.
My brake upgrade to SS non Brembo's , I bought used caliper brackets.
I purchased used WV rally rims. Used dash carpet, used Weather Tech floor mats, used grille and rear beauty bar and bowtie! I even have a used LightnSight.
My experience with hot rodding and car building of over 50 years tells me
K.I.S.S. And I shall , that and keep it inexpensive! But then again I'm of Scottish descent .
Oldblue is offline  
Old 02-19-2017, 08:15 AM
  #48  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Oldblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-2011
Location: Welland,Ont Canada
Posts: 36,502
Took a 175 mile cruise in the countryside yesterday, still no dreaded codes, the throttle body is clean and there's no oiley residue on the throttle blade or out the exhaust tip!
Oldblue is offline  
Old 02-25-2017, 07:07 PM
  #49  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Oldblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-2011
Location: Welland,Ont Canada
Posts: 36,502
Another 200 mile trip, same as last post! So no oil sucked into throttle body! No CEL light. I'll keep you posted!
Oldblue is offline  
Old 04-01-2017, 01:27 PM
  #50  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Oldblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-2011
Location: Welland,Ont Canada
Posts: 36,502
And so it's 2 months later, several long drives, still no oil being sucked into the TB !!
That was the goal to keep the intake clean! I've noticed improvements in fuel mileage, much better throttle response, and my stainless steel exhaust tip is much prettier! No black carbon build up!
Oldblue is offline  


Quick Reply: 2.2 Oil catch can, more of cleaning up then performance!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 PM.