Fuel Economy - Hypermiling Dedicated to discussions on fuel economy improvements and related modifications.

MPG 2.4 vs 400hp Vette

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2011, 09:48 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
nacademus's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-2010
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 904
Originally Posted by Old Lar
My HHR runs at 2500 rpm at 70 mph, mine is a 2.4L auto. My 87 Fiero GT also runs about the same. I also get about the same mileage with the Fiero, but have hit 35-38 mpg driving 55-60 with the HHR.

2.8L MPFI Fiero?
nacademus is offline  
Old 10-03-2011, 07:39 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
BlackScreaminMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 296
Many things are factors when it comes to Milage.

- Driving Weight (vette is far lighter)
- Aerodynamics (vette vs fridge)
- Gearing (the vette may have more HP but @ the cruise RPM its not nearly seeing as much.

In a F body T-56 its supposed to be a 0.50 6th gear but if its a MN12 trans which was a GTO/Z06 trans was slightly higher but not enough it make that much of a difference.

What the HHR lacks is Aerodynamics and weight, it does make up in space so you gotta look at the pros and cons.

Some instances my heavier, larger displacement 2000 Buick Century can get as good as milage as the HHR but if I drive conservativly then the HHR will win out in the long run. Keeping the cruise RPM's below 2k is the key.
BlackScreaminMachine is offline  
Old 03-18-2012, 05:09 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
silverstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-11-2012
Location: Western WI
Posts: 181
Not really

Originally Posted by hoganj
I have both and get the same mileage. Took the HHR to Maine (2500 miles) in July and got 30mpg. Took my 2007 Vette to New Mexico (1500 miles) last week and got the same 30mpg on the way down. I was running late on the way home and hit 120-130 mph a few times through Wyoming and South Dakota so the Vette mileage was down to 27.5.
Lot more room in the HHR so if the wife goes with me it is always the HHR.
Absolute nonsense. The dash mpg info is nonsense. Try doing it the old way on paper and you'll see your 31 mpg is really about 25 which is still good. I've heard of many people making these claims but the fact is even if you are in a high gear using low rpms at highway speeds you WILL NOT get more than 25 mpg in this car. I had a 07 for 2 years and a 99 for 6 years and the best I got using the paper track method was 25. The onboard mpg info is bs as it is in all autos.

Just a little more room in the HHR.
silverstreet is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 04:41 PM
  #14  
New Member
 
MCVETT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-14-2007
Location: Kingman, AZ.
Posts: 16
I have a 2006 Corvette Convertible 400 hp 6 soeed auto, it gets 30 hy & 26 city = avg 27.5 over all. My HHR is a 2011 2.2 that I avg 24.3 city & 31.5 hy over all avg = 27.9 Also have a 2003 SSR 300hp 4 speed auto gets 14.2 city & 21.8 hy over all = 18 mpg.
MCVETT2 is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 05:10 PM
  #15  
New Member
 
Rain's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-19-2012
Location: Biloxi
Posts: 12
Im seeing similar results between my 2011 HHR and my 2000 Corvette (6 spd). Same situation - when I need more room (or have to park in a questionable area) I take the HHR.
Rain is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 08:35 PM
  #16  
Platinum Member
 
Snoopy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-2006
Location: "Upland" Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 6,804
Originally Posted by silverstreet
Absolute nonsense. The dash mpg info is nonsense. Try doing it the old way on paper and you'll see your 31 mpg is really about 25 which is still good. I've heard of many people making these claims but the fact is even if you are in a high gear using low rpms at highway speeds you WILL NOT get more than 25 mpg in this car. I had a 07 for 2 years and a 99 for 6 years and the best I got using the paper track method was 25. The onboard mpg info is bs as it is in all autos.

Just a little more room in the HHR.

Absolute nonsense...back at you.

Don't know if you're speaking of the HHR's OR the Vette's (because of your merging skills)but, you are absolutely incorrect. The dash MPG indicator, while it may not be absolute, it is in most instances pretty accurate....sometimes as close as .5 gallons. That's a far distance from your assertion of 25 MPG from 31. Now I've done the calculations by the Ole' 400 divided by 15 method (many, many times, in fact) and I came to ALMOST the same conclusion as the MPG dash indicator.....maybe .6 mpg difference. In Fact, on vacation trips in any vehicle, I ALWAYS confirm my MPG by longhand.

Now, if you are getting erratic readers such as you describe I would suggest something is wrong with your math skills or the instrumentation in your vehicles.

And if you are unable to attain 30 MPG in the HHR on the highway, maybe your driving skills need to be improved. Almost everyone reports 30+ MPG.

If you are providing remarks in regard to a Corvette, I can believe the 25 MPG in 99....mostly because of the current change in technology. And if it is a 2007 Corvette, I know and personally drove in rallies where that car will exceed 30 MPG on the highway.
Snoopy is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 11:32 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Doc brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-07-2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,051
Originally Posted by Snoopy
Absolute nonsense...back at you.

Don't know if you're speaking of the HHR's OR the Vette's (because of your merging skills)but, you are absolutely incorrect. The dash MPG indicator, while it may not be absolute, it is in most instances pretty accurate....sometimes as close as .5 gallons. That's a far distance from your assertion of 25 MPG from 31. Now I've done the calculations by the Ole' 400 divided by 15 method (many, many times, in fact) and I came to ALMOST the same conclusion as the MPG dash indicator.....maybe .6 mpg difference. In Fact, on vacation trips in any vehicle, I ALWAYS confirm my MPG by longhand.

Now, if you are getting erratic readers such as you describe I would suggest something is wrong with your math skills or the instrumentation in your vehicles.

And if you are unable to attain 30 MPG in the HHR on the highway, maybe your driving skills need to be improved. Almost everyone reports 30+ MPG.
Ditto. I regularly reset my DIC at fill ups and often do the math. Usually its off, but never more than 1 mpg, and usually within .5 mpg. I've gotten 35 mpg at 60 mph, and regularly get 30/31 at 70 mph.
Doc brown is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 12:07 PM
  #18  
Premium Member
 
SS fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-09-2010
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 14,420
I get 25 to 27 after I got a tune, it was 21-23 with stg-1.
SS fan is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 03:16 PM
  #19  
Member
 
rink 610's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-17-2012
Location: chicago area
Posts: 34
Drove to Wi last week, 300 miles round trip, almost all xway, DIC reported 36mpg.Filled up a couple days later and by my calculations the DIC was dead on. Could'nt be happier.
rink 610 is offline  
Old 05-20-2012, 08:31 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
1970judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-12-2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 690
Power to weight ratio. The LS3 has to work a lot less, to move the vette.
1970judge is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
coolnerd
Tires & Wheels
22
06-07-2015 11:30 PM
saxrocks2009
The Lounge
8
02-04-2011 11:56 PM
87silver
The Lounge
13
04-14-2010 08:38 PM
Jeff®
The Lounge
10
01-21-2010 09:13 PM
c2vette
HHR SS
17
12-07-2008 11:54 PM



Quick Reply: MPG 2.4 vs 400hp Vette



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 PM.