General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

which engine is best

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2012, 06:58 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
JoeDickinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-30-2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1
which engine is best

Test drove a 2.4, and this week dealer bringing in one with a 2.2 . Any idea which one is the best?
JoeDickinson is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 07:19 PM
  #2  
Platinum Member
 
firemangeorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-06-2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 11,091
Welcome to the forum.
The question is, best for what? Reliability,fuel mileage,horsepower, or something else.
I have the SS with the 2.0, so I'll let someone else give their opinion.
firemangeorge is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 07:22 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
badassbowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-19-2010
Location: Buffalo ny
Posts: 1,529
I had the 2.2 in my cobalt(same platform), and the 2.4 in my first HHR. the engines are both "bulletproof" if maintained properly. they are almost identical partswise too... I liked the 2.4 better because it had a little more get up and go. the 2.2 will get you the best mileage but it is a slug if your looking for performance at all. its all about what you are looking for. If your hauling stuff all the time, the 2.4 would haul it easier... also the 2lt comes with the 2.4(usually) and comes with all the bells and whistles from the factory. the 2.2 or ls is less luxurious from the factory. anyhow:
I got no lower than 27-28mpgs with my cobalt(06 auto) and usually averaged over 30 with combined city/highway driving. My first HHR was a little less but still good and was averaging 27 or so combined.

I got 29 mpgs with the SS in one 70 mile trip which was 95% highway. but if I dont "drive it like I stole it" I get maybe 25 or 26 combined
badassbowtie is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 07:24 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
solman98's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-2006
Location: Dallas, GA
Posts: 6,050
As far as "better", they are basically the same. All Ecotec's are. You will get the same reliaiblity from either of them.
solman98 is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 09:09 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Greybeard999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-06-2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,869
2.4
Greybeard999 is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 09:18 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Breadfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-19-2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,015
If you are buying an automatic, you want the 2.4 for sure. That's what I went for with my last HHR since it has a little more oomph to make up for the extra drive-train bits. It ran great the whole time I had it.
Breadfan is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 09:22 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Laco's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-22-2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 763
I'm well satisfied with the 2.2 in my 2007. It does have a five speed manual, though, which probably provides quite a boost in performance. Mileage is great, high twenties in the city, mid 30's for pure highway.
Laco is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 09:50 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
oneton's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-13-2006
Location: Geneva, FL.
Posts: 1,567
I have three HHR's 06 LS 2.2 auto,07 LS 2.2 5 speed, 07 2LT 2.4 auto they are all the same to my wife, daughter and myself. All in high 20s in town low to mid 30s highway. Myself driving the wife's on daughters they B---- when I take there car you made my mileage go down. Well I had to test it to make sure it was safe to drive !
oneton is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 09:58 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Turbo Hearse's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-2012
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 334
2.0 is best. Screw the 2.2 and 2.4 :)
Turbo Hearse is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 10:36 PM
  #10  
Deceased
 
843de's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-30-2010
Location: Kannapolis NC
Posts: 25,739
to the forum Joe, and good luck with your hunt!

As to which engine is best, that's a loaded question as you've no doubt seen. Like oneton above, I've got two of the 2.2's and a 2.4 in the fleet. Functionally they are pretty darn close, the 2.4 has a wee bit more grunt, but the 2.2's are, in my opinion, sweeter with more willingness to rev and a crisper response.

Of course the top of the heap is the 2.0 Turbo, but it comes with a higher price tag, and occasionally bouts of temperamentality.

The important thing is to find the best HHR your budget allows, with the equipment you want on it, and the engine deal will shake itself out.
843de is offline  


Quick Reply: which engine is best



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 AM.