2.0L Performance Tech 260hp (235hp auto) Turbocharged SS tuner version. 260 lb-ft of torque

Forum Spec error?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 12:02 PM
  #1  
rommer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-17-2008
Posts: 287
From: NJ
Forum Spec error?

This forum lists the 2.0 as having 260HP and 245 lb-ft of torque. Shouldn't it be 260 lb-ft of torque?

(Yes I understand the figures I quote are for the 5 speed only but the auto is 235HP/233lb-ft per the Chevy website so where did the 245 come from?)
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 12:08 PM
  #2  
solman98's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-2006
Posts: 6,053
From: Dallas, GA
Correct, it should be 260/260.
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 08:10 PM
  #3  
rommer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-17-2008
Posts: 287
From: NJ
So who can fix get to fix it????
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 08:53 PM
  #4  
SindyDix's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Joined: 03-12-2006
Posts: 6,543
From: Lake Isabella CA
Only the Administrator JonnyB can do that. Send him a message via the 'contact us' link located at the upper right or lower right corners of any page.
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 07:04 AM
  #5  
rommer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-17-2008
Posts: 287
From: NJ
OK, I clicked the contact us link and sent a message. Didn't give me an option of who to send it to so I'll assume it went to him....

Thanks
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 09:16 AM
  #6  
SindyDix's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Joined: 03-12-2006
Posts: 6,543
From: Lake Isabella CA
That is correct, the 'contact us' goes right to JonyyB.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 06:17 AM
  #7  
rommer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-17-2008
Posts: 287
From: NJ
Hmmmm....

Been almost a week and no answer to email and no change to the spec. Is he an absentee landlord or something?
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 06:53 AM
  #8  
SindyDix's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Joined: 03-12-2006
Posts: 6,543
From: Lake Isabella CA
yes, or something....JonyyB is a busy guy!
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 08:30 AM
  #9  
rommer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-17-2008
Posts: 287
From: NJ
I never understood how some forum owners can just delegate off the moderation job and then go on their merry way and a forum still survives. Please don't take that as an attack as it is not meant to be. I've been in your shoes, ie a moderator on a popular forum with an absent owner and ultimately the forum goes belly up at some point. (The old Regal Boat Owners forum comes to mind) I prefer forums with an active owner. Just my 2 cents.

Oh well, not that big a deal anyway!!!! It is after all just a number!
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 09:10 AM
  #10  
shaginwgn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-24-2006
Posts: 2,315
From: Bowling Green, OH
Originally Posted by rommer
I never understood how some forum owners can just delegate off the moderation job and then go on their merry way and a forum still survives. Please don't take that as an attack as it is not meant to be. I've been in your shoes, ie a moderator on a popular forum with an absent owner and ultimately the forum goes belly up at some point. (The old Regal Boat Owners forum comes to mind) I prefer forums with an active owner. Just my 2 cents.

Oh well, not that big a deal anyway!!!! It is after all just a number!
This is not his only forum that he is the admin on.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 AM.