2.4L Performance Tech 16 valve 172 hp EcoTec with 162 lb-ft of torque

My GMPP intake; installed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 02:24 PM
  #21  
GDZHHR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-30-2006
Posts: 9,149
From: Maryland Heights, MO
I never got around to doing one stock.

I did do one with the CGS, it can be seen in my gallery. I'll be doing another set next week. T

he differences in the new baseline will be changing to GMPP intake and NGK iridium plugs. Reason for the dynos is that I'm going from a 50 to 75 shot of nitrous. I'll change to plugs and nozzles this week-end and do a couple of pulls next week. I'll be sure to post the results.

I'm really interested inseeing what the new plugs and intake does over the CGS and stock plugs.
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 05:45 PM
  #22  
Lee3333's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-18-2005
Posts: 1,791
From: Middle Village, NY
I am too. Back years ago, Mike SoCal said that his dyno results showed the CGS better than the box type, like the AirRaid. And that is similar to the GMPP. Numbers dont lie, so wel will soon see.
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #23  
The Curly 1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-08-2008
Posts: 505
From: United States of Texas
Numbers dont lie. But.......

Numbers dont lie but you don't always get all of the numbers you need to make an intellegent decision.
The best tests are baseline test then make change and back to stock to verify baseline. That can get very time consuming and expensive. Curly
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drummerboy0088
2.2L Performance Tech
19
Feb 10, 2015 12:25 PM
Digital_Rapture
2.4L Performance Tech
7
Apr 5, 2011 11:20 PM
ohnomobile
2.2L Performance Tech
7
Jan 18, 2010 01:36 AM
xzombiex66
2.2L Performance Tech
5
Feb 11, 2009 12:00 PM
dnbguy86
2.4L Performance Tech
16
Oct 12, 2006 11:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 PM.