Canadian Mid East Nunavut, Manitoba, and Ontario

Interesting '08 HHR trivia (Canada specific)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2007, 04:14 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
calgaryhhr's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-21-2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 939
I wonder if I can do that on my tax to go down into a lower bracket???
calgaryhhr is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 03:19 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Alzonie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-23-2006
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,082
If the Government can fudge facts and figures to suit whatever their current needs are, can GM be expected to do anything less?
Alzonie is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 03:34 PM
  #13  
Founding Member
 
ChevyMgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,210
I don't know about the Canadian vehicles but for the ones made for sale in the USA the following would apply:

ALL 2008 vehicles have lower EPA fuel economy ratings due to a change in how they run the fuel economy testing. In other words these figures are closer to what you will actually get.

There was no change in gears.

The 2008 has a 61.3L/16.2 gallon tank (same as prior year)

TPMS is on all 2008's (at least all of the ones we have received)
ChevyMgr is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 08:52 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DreamHHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-14-2007
Location: Luskville, QC, Canada
Posts: 380
ALL 2008 vehicles have lower EPA fuel economy ratings
In this case, it's higher, and that's why my eyebrows are up. 1/2 liter less per 100 km translates to more miles per gallon.

Yves
DreamHHR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
firemangeorge
The Lounge
21
10-22-2013 09:11 AM
Jeff®
The Lounge
6
12-04-2008 09:52 PM
LT1GMC
HHR SS
4
04-20-2008 11:39 AM
Old Ray
Canadian North Pacific
2
02-01-2008 03:38 PM
Olskool
Appearance/Modifications Discussions
17
07-05-2007 05:20 PM



Quick Reply: Interesting '08 HHR trivia (Canada specific)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 AM.