Canadian Mid East Nunavut, Manitoba, and Ontario

Interesting '08 HHR trivia (Canada specific)

Old Dec 14, 2007 | 04:14 PM
  #11  
calgaryhhr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-21-2006
Posts: 939
From: Calgary
I wonder if I can do that on my tax to go down into a lower bracket???
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 03:19 PM
  #12  
Alzonie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-23-2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Chandler, AZ
If the Government can fudge facts and figures to suit whatever their current needs are, can GM be expected to do anything less?
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #13  
ChevyMgr's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Joined: 11-23-2007
Posts: 8,210
From: Texas
I don't know about the Canadian vehicles but for the ones made for sale in the USA the following would apply:

ALL 2008 vehicles have lower EPA fuel economy ratings due to a change in how they run the fuel economy testing. In other words these figures are closer to what you will actually get.

There was no change in gears.

The 2008 has a 61.3L/16.2 gallon tank (same as prior year)

TPMS is on all 2008's (at least all of the ones we have received)
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #14  
DreamHHR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-14-2007
Posts: 380
From: Luskville, QC, Canada
ALL 2008 vehicles have lower EPA fuel economy ratings
In this case, it's higher, and that's why my eyebrows are up. 1/2 liter less per 100 km translates to more miles per gallon.

Yves
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
firemangeorge
The Lounge
21
Oct 22, 2013 09:11 AM
Jeff®
The Lounge
6
Dec 4, 2008 09:52 PM
LT1GMC
HHR SS
4
Apr 20, 2008 11:39 AM
Old Ray
Canadian North Pacific
2
Feb 1, 2008 03:38 PM
Olskool
Appearance/Modifications Discussions
17
Jul 5, 2007 05:20 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.