<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Chevy HHR Network - 2.2L Performance Tech</title>
		<link>https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/</link>
		<description>16 valve 143 hp EcoTec with 150 lb-ft of torque</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:07:09 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Stroker build</title>
			<link>https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/2-2l-performance-tech-5/stroker-build-67955/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 22:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>OK having a 2.2 L engine and you’re putting a 2.4 L crankshaft in it the issue isn’t the counterweight hitting the piston is the reluctor wheel for your crankshaft which really you just need one...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>OK having a 2.2 L engine and you’re putting a 2.4 L crankshaft in it the issue isn’t the counterweight hitting the piston is the reluctor wheel for your crankshaft which really you just need one piston on that back  number four cylinder but you also need the 82172.4 L crankshaft rods your original Pistons will work except the number forth one but you can grind it down yourself to make it have clearance</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/2-2l-performance-tech-5/">2.2L Performance Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>Handsumrob28*</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/2-2l-performance-tech-5/stroker-build-67955/</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
