GM Ignition Recall Extended to All HHR's 2006-2011 UPDATED!!!
#111
I caught the tail end of a report on NPR this morning that said GM had 'possibly' replaced over 5000 ignition switches with the old type switches, which is why they are now including all HHR models in the recall. And that it was also part PR what with the new CEO 'turning over a new leaf'. A fresh start.
Thus many of the 08-11's could have a broken part right from the factory as well, though not as likely.
#112
recall now effects hhr up to 2011 models
seen on detroit news channel 4 that gm is recalling all models to check key tumblers. it said that there were some 5000 of them installed and they don't know which vehicles or models they were put into.so as a result they have to check all vehicles .news cast was mar 28/14 11 pm news.wonder where this leaves us canadian purchasers as their has been nothing coming from our ntsb or government on this problem . regards&later KEWATIN
#113
Since mine DOES sometimes have difficulty with the ignition switch and I do drive on some very curvy and bumpy roads depending on how I come home it really sucks that I've read that the thing could shut off on me in those conditions. Hairpin turns with a 100+ foot drop would be kinda rough.
#114
recalls and more recalls
Ah, the wonders of the new computer assisted vehicle. The more they add, the more things that can go wrong. Did we ask for all this?
#115
When did the title of the thread get changed? And where is the link to the "ALL HHRs" part? I did re read the first 3 pages and the last 4 pages. I refuse to re read a bunch of junk about people getting their letters.
That's 95,000 not 5,000 switches in the wild.
Just to be sure, I typed my VIN into the recall data base and got nothing back.
That's 95,000 not 5,000 switches in the wild.
Just to be sure, I typed my VIN into the recall data base and got nothing back.
#116
Go to post #90 Don, I linked in stories from both CNBC and Reuters when they broke.
I'm not surprised that GM hasn't updated their VIN checker for recall info yet, the recall was extended right at 5pm on Friday night, so it'll be Monday or later until they get their site updated.
I would never change the thread title based on unsubstantiated reports or rumors.
News links now embedded in Post #1 on the Front Page.
I'm not surprised that GM hasn't updated their VIN checker for recall info yet, the recall was extended right at 5pm on Friday night, so it'll be Monday or later until they get their site updated.
I would never change the thread title based on unsubstantiated reports or rumors.
News links now embedded in Post #1 on the Front Page.
Last edited by 843de; 04-01-2014 at 10:05 PM.
#117
OK, it wasn't imbedded then, and the other links I found with Google were not exactly definitive.
What I saw is that cars that had the part replaced since 2007 are covered, not ALL HHRs. The concern is that the defective part was sold to after-market suppliers, so IF your part was replaced AFTER it left the factory you are included. At least that's what I read.
I will post here when I get my letter. (no smiley required)
That was 95,000 units sold to the after-market, I think it says possible 5,000 installed in the previous campaign. The 3 I've read all say different things.
Curious about the Cruze SS thing?
What I saw is that cars that had the part replaced since 2007 are covered, not ALL HHRs. The concern is that the defective part was sold to after-market suppliers, so IF your part was replaced AFTER it left the factory you are included. At least that's what I read.
I will post here when I get my letter. (no smiley required)
That was 95,000 units sold to the after-market, I think it says possible 5,000 installed in the previous campaign. The 3 I've read all say different things.
Curious about the Cruze SS thing?
#118
My mistake for not embedding the links in Post #1 last night Don, it was a long day.
I was shown x-ray photos of a "bad" part vs. a "good" part by my dealer's Chief Service Writer, and the internal differences are minor enough that even taking the assemblies apart wouldn't be a guarantee of weeding out the "bad" ones.
So by extendlng the recall, GM is hoping to get all of the first design switches out of vehicles still in service.
If Drew is allowed to let me copy those photos, I'll post them on the site so members can see how minor the difference is between a "known good" and a "defective" part.
Recycling the part number was a major "Oops!", and the people responsible are probably long gone.
I was shown x-ray photos of a "bad" part vs. a "good" part by my dealer's Chief Service Writer, and the internal differences are minor enough that even taking the assemblies apart wouldn't be a guarantee of weeding out the "bad" ones.
So by extendlng the recall, GM is hoping to get all of the first design switches out of vehicles still in service.
If Drew is allowed to let me copy those photos, I'll post them on the site so members can see how minor the difference is between a "known good" and a "defective" part.
Recycling the part number was a major "Oops!", and the people responsible are probably long gone.
#120
Not making excuses for anyone just telling it how it is. The new ign switches are getting new part #"s so they will know the difference and replacing ALL of them even if you had one replaced before. I would advise All of you to get it done. If yours doesen't feel loose you could probily let the rush go by first but DO get it done PLEASE. And please remember you Dealer is just trying to get them done as fast as possable so be understanding. WE just want to fix your HHR"S and all of the car in the recall.