Racing Discussion Race Track Victories - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

1/4 times?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2005, 11:18 AM
  #11  
New Member
 
vasyclone's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-18-2005
Location: Stafford, Virginia
Posts: 17
Registration weight is 3019, and I have found that here in virginia that the registration weight is within 1 to 2 hundred pounds of actual wet weight.
vasyclone is offline  
Old 11-30-2005, 11:40 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
captain howdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-14-2005
Location: Rochester,N.Y.
Posts: 9,121
Mine is registered at 3202#. It probably depends on model and options.
captain howdy is offline  
Old 12-30-2005, 01:47 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
SoCalHHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-14-2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,359
CH - I think yours has more "Heavy Metal."
SoCalHHR is offline  
Old 01-02-2006, 12:47 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
duffy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-15-2005
Location: sand springs oklahoma
Posts: 3
for every 100 lbs it will run one tenth of a second slower, so an extra 1000 lbs compared to a vehicle thats otherwise exactly the same and driven exactly the same it will run 1 second slower.
duffy01 is offline  
Old 01-06-2006, 06:51 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
captain howdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-14-2005
Location: Rochester,N.Y.
Posts: 9,121
Times as posted in the February 2006 Car & Driver. The test HHR had a 2.4 and 5-speed manual.

0-60 mph : 8.0 seconds
0-90 mph : 17.4 seconds
1/4 mile : 16.1 seconds @ 87 mph
Rolling 5-60 mph: 8.9 seconds
The top speed is 126
captain howdy is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 11:16 AM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
Vita's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-13-2006
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by captain howdy
Times as posted in the February 2006 Car & Driver. The test HHR had a 2.4 and 5-speed manual.

0-60 mph : 8.0 seconds
0-90 mph : 17.4 seconds
1/4 mile : 16.1 seconds @ 87 mph
Rolling 5-60 mph: 8.9 seconds
The top speed is 126
numbers seem botched. 0-60 at 8.0 yet 5-60 is 8.9? something doesn't add up...
Vita is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 12:06 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
captain howdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-14-2005
Location: Rochester,N.Y.
Posts: 9,121
Originally Posted by Vita
numbers seem botched. 0-60 at 8.0 yet 5-60 is 8.9? something doesn't add up...
I thought all cars took longer to get to 60 from a rolling start.
captain howdy is offline  
Old 02-16-2006, 09:08 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
dan-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-12-2006
Location: Space Coast, FL
Posts: 847
They usually do, because from a dead stop everything hooks up much quicker, and from a rolling start an automatic has to go through the gyrations of kick down and that takes time. With a manual, rolling at 5 MPH usually means your in second gear and at that speed second gear will want to bog the engine. You can do it in first gear but be prepared to shift into second very quickly after you launch because your already rolling and engine RPM is already building.
dan-d is offline  
Old 02-17-2006, 05:38 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
JoeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-02-2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,245
After sorting through all the expert / amateur opinions in this thread, I've scientifically concluded why SoCal's HHR is soooo fast....


It's the stubby antenna, folks!! Gotta be worth a full second or more on the 1/4 mi. and at least 15 MPH trap speed!! :)

So... I ordered one of the previously guarded speed-secret antennas!!

Look out world!!!
JoeR is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:12 PM
  #20  
New Member
 
DragonWagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-2006
Location: Punxsutawney, Pa
Posts: 23
My HHR LT1
From the factory with the 2.2 ecotech and the 5 speed tranny ran

16.868 in the 1/4 mile at a speed of 81.54

now how do i make it faster lol
DragonWagon is offline  


Quick Reply: 1/4 times?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.