2.0L Performance Tech 260hp (235hp auto) Turbocharged SS tuner version. 260 lb-ft of torque

*NEW* ZZP Intake Tube for the HHR SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 01:37 PM
  #11  
Turbo Hearse's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-2012
Posts: 334
From: Livermore, CA
I like the idea of a SRI but I think it needs to be routed just a hair differently and it needs some sort of heat shield.

Going to be fabbing up my own soon so we'll see what we can come up with then lol
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 02:39 PM
  #12  
moonsign's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-20-2009
Posts: 1,058
From: Hayward, Ca.
Joe: You can shake your head all you want. When I state things, they come from fifty years, of working on, some driving, and crewing many types of race cars. I did'nt just fall off the banana boat yesterday, and I a lot of my information comes from experience, and from some very well know racers,ect.
I was'nt trying to get into a "Mine's bigger than yours" deal, only to state that a lot of the racing deal is a "Monkey see-Monkey do" deal. People sometimes buy a part, just because evryones else does, and the manufactures will gladly tell you it's the "Hot deal" and sell you the part.
If you picked up 12 honest H.P., then fine, you did.
The air intake deal is inmaterial, since I know mine works, and I'm perfectly happy with that.
The backpressure and coilover quote, comes from both a five-and seven time SCCA autocross champs, among others.
Don't take it so personal, just because you have the parts on your car. If it works for you then fine. You do your deal and I'll do mine, and I'll still lay my opinions out there. If I offend you ,then just "get over it". "Moon"
P.S. I myself am quilty of shaking my head at times at some of the suff I hear on here.
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 03:28 PM
  #13  
RobSSTurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-05-2011
Posts: 1,056
From: south florida
I not to worry about the intake anymore the maf is in the coldside pipe and iat's are lower then the map temps so the intake is find were it's at.
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 06:59 PM
  #14  
Joe Schulte's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-09-2011
Posts: 372
From: South Haven, MI
Originally Posted by moonsign
Joe: You can shake your head all you want. When I state things, they come from fifty years, of working on, some driving, and crewing many types of race cars. I did'nt just fall off the banana boat yesterday, and I a lot of my information comes from experience, and from some very well know racers,ect.
I was'nt trying to get into a "Mine's bigger than yours" deal, only to state that a lot of the racing deal is a "Monkey see-Monkey do" deal. People sometimes buy a part, just because evryones else does, and the manufactures will gladly tell you it's the "Hot deal" and sell you the part.
If you picked up 12 honest H.P., then fine, you did.
The air intake deal is inmaterial, since I know mine works, and I'm perfectly happy with that.
The backpressure and coilover quote, comes from both a five-and seven time SCCA autocross champs, among others.
Don't take it so personal, just because you have the parts on your car. If it works for you then fine. You do your deal and I'll do mine, and I'll still lay my opinions out there. If I offend you ,then just "get over it". "Moon"
P.S. I myself am quilty of shaking my head at times at some of the suff I hear on here.
You're right, your intake does work. However, I promise a gain with the ZZP tube. Sure the backpressure you love works as well, but I'd promise a gain once more out of a catless downpipe. This is simple, I don't need 50 years of experience to lay out logic and proven gains on the LNF, they're plastered on the internet. I'm sure you could adjust the float on my 4-barrel Holley if my HHR had one, but it doesn't, and I'm not slapping throttle body spacers and Tornado's in the intake of my HHR for gains, I'm installing functional and proven parts and won't BS anyone on the forum into believing otherwise.

As for the coilover deal, just because the vehicle is driven daily doesn't exempt it from being competitively driven as well. Therefore the owner of vehicle should dictate what is a "waste" or not.


Originally Posted by RobSSTurbo
I not to worry about the intake anymore the maf is in the coldside pipe and iat's are lower then the map temps so the intake is find were it's at.
I know you're running the Dejon as well, but the gains aren't found in the temps, more-so in the crushed factory portion of the intake this ZZP part would eliminate.
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 04:36 PM
  #15  
Pudmunkie's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-31-2010
Posts: 28
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by moonsign
Joe: You can shake your head all you want. When I state things, they come from fifty years, of working on, some driving, and crewing many types of race cars....
Promoting 'back pressure' as a positive thing for any car, not to mention a turbo car hurts your credibility when it comes to performance modifications. I suggest you do some googling; start with 'exhaust gas velocity'.

Have a good evening.
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 04:40 PM
  #16  
Chevy13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-18-2011
Posts: 384
From: Ocala, FL
Some street applications do better with back pressure. Not a turbo though
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 08:05 PM
  #17  
Pudmunkie's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-31-2010
Posts: 28
From: Michigan
It isn't the back pressure; it's the velocity of the exhaust gas.
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 08:13 PM
  #18  
mightymouse's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-2008
Posts: 769
From: LaMarque,Tx
Originally Posted by Joe Schulte
EDIT: Let me note the photo posted is meant to show the "upgraded intake tube", not the intake as whole, as the pipe would be the Dejon piece. Do I see more gains from this upgraded tube and stock box? Possibly, but I disliked covering my engine with such. I am sure ZZP will be produced the tube to work with the OEM box.




This just a sample of the personal opinions I've shaken my head at watching you post on this forum . Mere opinions though, that's all they are.

There is nothing "misleading" from ZZP here. They produce parts for this market alone and develop them on company vehicles. These vehicles perform at the track and hold records. I don't think Ryan's car has this same intake tube for aesthetic value, it has only ran a 9.82@ 141. Matt's LNF? 10.99@ 133. Stock turbo LNF? 11.62@119.

This was simple:
-there is my HHR
-there is ZZP's dyno


After putting out lower number's than the Cobalt crowd my setup was looked over by Ryan, one thing noted was the intake tube directly off of the turbo. They do produce the part for the Cobalt for a reason. That said my factory tube came off, and a ZZP intake tube came out, and was modified to fit.

12WHP.

One thing to note with the people looking to make power on this site and increase availability of parts that do such:

Tim @ ZZP did contact me a week after my dyno for fitment of a production tube onto my HHR. However it is still in storage away from the winter elements. I know they have fitted the tube on an automatic HHR SS that is local, and only wanted mine to verify manual in which I'm 99.9% sure would be just fine. "Joe"
hey joe,i'm not shooting your mod down,however,i could have sworn someone made an intake for our cars already and the dollar to hp ratio wasn't worth it. i think it made the same or a tad bit less than the stock box. you bring something interesting for debate though. on the stock lnf that ran 11.6, which car was that in?? cobalts will run faster than us due to the gear ratios are different,weight and better areo dynamics. also when you say stock,i can guess that means just bolt on parts with the stock turbo and internals. if it's the solstice,then rwd helps that out ALOT. again,not bashing your mod,if it works,go with it. i would like to see parts dynoed in the summer. if you can make power in the heat,then you know when it gets cooler it will work even better.
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 08:21 PM
  #19  
Chevy13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-18-2011
Posts: 384
From: Ocala, FL
Originally Posted by Pudmunkie
It isn't the back pressure; it's the velocity of the exhaust gas.
That is opposite of one another...
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 08:26 PM
  #20  
Pudmunkie's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-31-2010
Posts: 28
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Chevy13
That is opposite of one another...

Let me assist.

http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/te...Scavenging.pdf

This will help you with back pressure. Also realize that when I'm talking about gas velocity, we're talking about scavenging to evacuate the cylinders fully, and keep things flowing quickly, and evenly.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.