2.2L Performance Tech 16 valve 143 hp EcoTec with 150 lb-ft of torque

Engine mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #1  
06Daytona's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-29-2007
Posts: 165
From: NC
Engine mod

I've searched Ebay for "HHR" and seen these performance mod chips or modules that claim increased HP and fuel enconomy (some only claim HP).

I was just wondering if anyone here has used these and what results you got from them?

Thanks.
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 12:19 PM
  #2  
06Daytona's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-29-2007
Posts: 165
From: NC
This was one of many that I was looking at...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Chevy...spagenameZWDVW

I just wonder if it's worth it or not.
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 01:07 PM
  #3  
HonestBlues's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-30-2006
Posts: 661
From: Lower Alabama
I think this "more HP and better mileage" stuff is ineffective at best and at worst will screw up the car's computer.I would stay away from it.
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 01:28 PM
  #4  
captain howdy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 9,121
From: Rochester,N.Y.
Wow. They hooked a rheostat up to the resistor and put it in a pretty box. No wonder it's better than it's other ebay competitors. If you actually bought that you would be a fool.
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 02:07 PM
  #5  
Harpozep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-2006
Posts: 2,507
From: New London, CT USA
Yup, like the others say, it is wise to stay away from these type of products, especially on ebay. Ebay is a scammer's paradise. Thousands of new crooks each day. It is truly a "Whack a mole" situation for law enforcement and the internet.

Remember, these HHRs are not hypos. They are essentially grocery getter though wee really do not want to admit it. I think with all the mods know at present that actually work, we can get maybe ten extra horses. I'm hearing that some of the performance chipping options really do help. I have the CGS intake and had the IMCO muffler. Both add a lot more noise than I really want for the slightly added four horses. I do seem to get a bit more MPG with just the intake, but am thinking it will go soon and I'll go back to stock.

I'm happy with the HHR I have as being essentially a nonperformance vehicle.
When the turbo SS type is marketed, then THAT is a different story.
My wife will not be happy when I rep0ort that we have to get that one!
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #6  
06Daytona's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-29-2007
Posts: 165
From: NC
Thanks for the help guys.
I'll pass on the junk then. Besides, I'm currently getting 32-34mpg and loving it. I don't have to have the extra HP, but if it was available, then I might go for it.
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #7  
MrVette's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-09-2007
Posts: 1,942
From: S.E. Michigan
Originally Posted by 06Daytona
Thanks for the help guys.
I'll pass on the junk then. Besides, I'm currently getting 32-34mpg and loving it. I don't have to have the extra HP, but if it was available, then I might go for it.
32-34 mpg?!?! D I got to lay off the gas, LOL
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 09:38 PM
  #8  
Goose's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-31-2007
Posts: 2,479
From: New Hampsha
32-34 is what I get to but to be fair 95% of my driving is highway miles. Keep it between 65-75 on the highway and those #'s are easy to get


Goose
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 02:18 PM
  #9  
txbowhunter's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-13-2006
Posts: 10
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Goose
32-34 is what I get to but to be fair 95% of my driving is highway miles. Keep it between 65-75 on the highway and those #'s are easy to get


Goose
Yeah they are , I got 33 ½ on a camping trip fully loaded and cruise was set at 72 all the way - 60 miles. Only long trip so far, but it was a good check of mileage .
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 06:01 PM
  #10  
O6ChevyHHR's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: 11-18-2005
Posts: 3,307
From: Naples, FL
dont wast you time and money on something that hasent been tested for the HHR!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.