2.2L Performance Tech 16 valve 143 hp EcoTec with 150 lb-ft of torque

IMCO T924 Question, for those in the know...

Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #1  
Nazramoth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-21-2007
Posts: 145
From: Atlanta
IMCO T924 Question, for those in the know...

I'm thinking about getting this muffler. Maybe not right away.. but perhaps further on down the road.

I like the way my car sounds, but at the same time I keep thinking that I want a but more of an aggressive sound to it, but not too much. It seems this IMCO T924 is the way to go, a lot of HHR owners certainly favor it.

My only question is, how does it effect the "inside" noise level? I mean, inside the car, is there much difference?
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:38 PM
  #2  
Wackaloon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-01-2006
Posts: 175
From: San Marcos, TX
First question for you is, which engine do you have?

If you've got 2.4, then T924; if 2.2, then T909. Wish I'd known that before I put the T924 on Nellie.

The T924 is set up for 2.5" pipes (size on 2.4), while the T909 is for 2.25" pipes (size on 2.2).

As far as the sound goes, I find it a little obtrusive, but not bad enuf to go back to stock. It doesn't sound "ricey".
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:40 PM
  #3  
Nazramoth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-21-2007
Posts: 145
From: Atlanta
2.2L Engine... which is why I posted my question in the 2.2L Forum

Didn't know there was a different Muffler, as the T924 is the only one I've ever seen mentioned.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #4  
Applenut's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-2006
Posts: 732
From: Pottstown, PA
First off, my wife and I both love it.

It is louder in the cabin, but I don't think it's obnoxious.

In my opinion, it's worth it.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:46 PM
  #5  
herojoe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-27-2006
Posts: 85
From: Ewa Beach, HI
I have the T924 on the 2.2. Took a little modification for the welding, but it when on fine. The sound is barely noticable compared to stock. Not much louder at all, although it does produce a little more sound while gunning it, not even close to being obnocious.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #6  
herojoe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-27-2006
Posts: 85
From: Ewa Beach, HI
obnoxious**
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #7  
Wackaloon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-01-2006
Posts: 175
From: San Marcos, TX
Originally Posted by Nazramoth
2.2L Engine... which is why I posted my question in the 2.2L Forum

Didn't know there was a different Muffler, as the T924 is the only one I've ever seen mentioned.
Doh, Ishudda figured out dat dis wuz in da 2.2 area

If you search for T909, you will find a couple of threads that adress the size disparity. The T909 is the one you want, it will fit nicely with no need for adaptors. It cost me an extra $25 bucks for the adaptors to fit the T924 into mine.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 11:20 PM
  #8  
courthousedeb's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-19-2006
Posts: 5,065
From: Arvada CO
I had the 924 put on my 2.2L and love it. No extra charge here to haveit installed.... Might want to check with local muffler shop...but I did purchase mine from them which could have made the difference too.

I don't find it obtrusive...but then again...I play my radio pretty loud too.
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 08:04 AM
  #9  
KY Dave's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-19-2006
Posts: 473
From: Kentucky
I love mine. A little more noise when you really put your foot into it, but that is good. Cruising on the interstate, there is no change.
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #10  
ivtech's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-14-2006
Posts: 1,615
From: La Crescenta, CA
Originally Posted by KY Dave
I love mine. A little more noise when you really put your foot into it, but that is good. Cruising on the interstate, there is no change.
Same here.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.