2.4L Performance Tech 16 valve 172 hp EcoTec with 162 lb-ft of torque

K&N air box?

Old Apr 5, 2009 | 02:56 PM
  #1  
Hib Halverson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-29-2007
Posts: 256
From: CenCoast California
K&N air box?

Anyone here tried the K&N Fuel Injection Performance Kit (FIPK) on a 2.4?

If so, what were the results?
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 04:53 PM
  #2  
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: 10-08-2007
Posts: 1,821
From: Minnesota
If you are refering to K&N part number 63-3056 we have sold a few. Around a 10HP gain...

Can be found here:
http://www.turbotechracing.com/produ...idproduct=5067

And in stock :)
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 11:57 PM
  #3  
Panel08's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-22-2008
Posts: 118
From: SOCAL
can they be used on 2.2?
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 05:57 PM
  #4  
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: 10-08-2007
Posts: 1,821
From: Minnesota
K&N only shows it fits the 2.4L at this time... Anyone else verify the intakes are the exact same between the 2.2 and the 2.4L?
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #5  
HipHotRod's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-04-2008
Posts: 2,366
From: Long Beach, Ca
I can hear Joe now..................5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 06:42 PM
  #6  
Panel08's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-22-2008
Posts: 118
From: SOCAL
HAHA yea where is he?
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #7  
Hib Halverson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-29-2007
Posts: 256
From: CenCoast California
Originally Posted by TurboTechRacing
If you are refering to K&N part number 63-3056 we have sold a few. Around a 10HP gain...
Can be found here:
http://www.turbotechracing.com/produ...idproduct=5067
And in stock :)
Ok.
Based on "TurboTechRacing's" earlier post, back in Sept. I took my truck out to K&N and had them install the Fuel Injection Performance Kit for HHRs then run it on one of the chassis dynos on K&N's R&D department.

The performance increase wasn't quite 10-hp but it was credible. Executive summary: on average an increase of 8-hp and 6-lbs/ft torque, SAE-corrected at the front wheels. In addition to the convincing performance improvement the K&N had none of the fit problems I experienced when I tested the Airaid intake kit last year on my HHR five-speed. For more info on that see the following threads:
https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/show...=Airaid&page=2
https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/show...ghlight=Airaid
https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/show...=Airaid&page=2

The K&N also is better looking that the Airaid. Lastly, unlike the Airaid which is open in the front, the K&N FIPK fully encloses the filter which I feel is a better design.

In a few days I'll post a more detailed account of my experiences with the K&N FIPK.
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 08:08 AM
  #8  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-12-2009
Posts: 143
From: Charlotte NC
I went with the Airaid instead because of the lower cost. I believe performance between the two is similar... it just depends on whether you want a complete box or just a cradle.
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 06:33 PM
  #9  
hhrcrafty's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-24-2006
Posts: 1,761
From: The Show-Me State
I doubt anyone's going to feel anything from any cold air intake without a real ECM tune for the new airflow. From what I've discovered in the Mustang community, nobody running a real performance car just bolts on a CAI. Everyone expects to pay for a tune that'll maximize the performance of the CAI and wring every last bit of power out of the new airflow.

That is, of course, if you believe that the stock airbox loses more airflow than the plastic tube you're bolting on in its place. Or that the intake tube diameter on the aftermarket CAI is any bigger or flows more air than the stocker.
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 08:41 AM
  #10  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-12-2009
Posts: 143
From: Charlotte NC
Well, the filter on an aftermarket intake obviously poses less restriction than the stock one does. As far as "feeling" any gains from just bolting the unit on... it's not gonna happen. These intakes gain 10hp at most, you can't really feel that.

On the tuning subject. A good retune is going to make the most out of any modifications to your engine. That being said, if you are planning on adding multiple bolt-ons over time (intake, header, exhaust, etc.) it is simpler to wait till you are done and get retuned once.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.