2.4L Performance Tech 16 valve 172 hp EcoTec with 162 lb-ft of torque

Man, this mileage sux...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:16 PM
  #31  
oneton's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-13-2006
Posts: 1,567
From: Geneva, FL.
I have a 2.2 auto 45K+ 27.7mpg and I don't drive for mpg
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 07:09 PM
  #32  
GCarp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-18-2006
Posts: 1,036
From: Hatboro, PA
Originally Posted by RandyTheHack
Again... the wheels and tires are 100% STOCK.

Now... I did not check distance between mile markers, but if I were off more than a foot or two, I would see speed differences; I do not.
My thoughts on this were that MAYBE the car originally had 16" wheels and the dealer (or someone else down the line) swapped them for the 17's and didn't have the BCM recalibrated. To the purchaser, they would appear to be stock because that is what you got from the dealer when you drove it off the lot. I'm not sure if the circumference of the 16's and the 17's are the same though. Just a thought with such a large discrepancy in the mileage.
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 07:30 PM
  #33  
tireman1554's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-30-2006
Posts: 1,141
From: Lake Conroe, Texas
When I first read this post I scratched my head and wondered if that DIC was even remotely close to actual. I did a little calculation of my own with a calculator versus the DIC. On one full tank of regular I got 29.7 according to the DIC. On the calculator I got just over 30. No too bad of a difference I think.
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 08:15 PM
  #34  
pitbull76's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-2006
Posts: 931
From: Peoria, IL
I have recently been checking my mileage vs the DIC and it's been damn near dead on. +- 0.2MPG over a tankful.
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 06:37 AM
  #35  
DreamHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-14-2007
Posts: 380
From: Luskville, QC, Canada
I'd suspect a faulty fuel injector (putting in more fuel than the computer thinks it is). Weren't there a couple of people last year with similar problems that had injectors replaced?

Also, you'll never get the full mileage potential with regular gas on the 2.4.

Yves
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 06:57 AM
  #36  
pitbull76's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-2006
Posts: 931
From: Peoria, IL
Originally Posted by DreamHHR
Also, you'll never get the full mileage potential with regular gas on the 2.4.

Yves
But you can get pretty damn close. My HHR hasn't seen anything but regular for months now, and the economy is nearly the same. It would not account for the original poster's lousy economy.
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 07:00 AM
  #37  
pitbull76's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-2006
Posts: 931
From: Peoria, IL
Originally Posted by stu1011
You know, I would be happy with 22 mpg. I drive 18 miles a day to and from work, which 14 of it is interstate, I manage to get a resounding 18 mpg. My dealer say to bring it in, but they do not give out loaners for me to use to get home and to work. I really am starting to dislike my car.

Stu,
I know that taking the car to the dealer w/o a loaner is a pain, but is it more costly than living with the problems? If you don't find a way to get the car in but continue to complain about it, that just doesn't make much sense to me. Pay for a rental if you have to.
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 07:24 AM
  #38  
hhrcrafty's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-24-2006
Posts: 1,761
From: The Show-Me State
People who get all up in arms about this crap crack me up. The fact that you honestly think that the car should get over 30 MPG during the winter running regular fuel, laden with passengers and baggage, going 70 MPH over hilly KY terrain is ridiculous. Try THAT with a Prius and you might pick up 5 MPG over the HHR with a rougher, noisier ride.

I've said it before: If you really hate the car that much, go buy your me-too yuppie Toyota and leave everyone else alone.
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 08:16 AM
  #39  
RandyTheHack's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-29-2007
Posts: 28
From: Georgetown, KY
Angry

Originally Posted by hhrcrafty
People who get all up in arms about this crap crack me up. The fact that you honestly think that the car should get over 30 MPG during the winter running regular fuel, laden with passengers and baggage, going 70 MPH over hilly KY terrain is ridiculous. Try THAT with a Prius and you might pick up 5 MPG over the HHR with a rougher, noisier ride.

I've said it before: If you really hate the car that much, go buy your me-too yuppie Toyota and leave everyone else alone.
stultorum calami carbones moenia chartae

Apparently you've managed to trade your chalk for a keyboard.

Last edited by RandyTheHack; Feb 19, 2008 at 08:49 AM.
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 08:27 AM
  #40  
wingfeather's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-2008
Posts: 223
From: Virginia
One more thought - are you using the remote start a lot? I would imagine that leaving the car to warm up a lot would reduce your self-calculated MPG.

In the most polite way I can say it - I still can't believe you get better mpg from the Silverado. I'd say keep that truck because it defies all experiences I've had with large vehicles.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 PM.