I Like Pioneers...
Senior Member
Joined: 02-03-2006
Posts: 1,785
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by cj krause
CDs are not prehistoric
just the way you guys use them
you buy ur expensive IPODs
on one cd at 196KPS I can get 105 to 113 songs on one cd for around 13 to 18 cents per disc
if i go 48 to 96 i can get over 300 to 450 songs
and how much did you pay for your IPOD?
just the way you guys use them
you buy ur expensive IPODs
on one cd at 196KPS I can get 105 to 113 songs on one cd for around 13 to 18 cents per disc
if i go 48 to 96 i can get over 300 to 450 songs
and how much did you pay for your IPOD?
Senior Member
Joined: 01-21-2006
Posts: 120
From: United States
Originally Posted by cj krause
CDs are not prehistoric
just the way you guys use them
you buy ur expensive IPODs
on one cd at 196KPS I can get 105 to 113 songs on one cd for around 13 to 18 cents per disc
if i go 48 to 96 i can get over 300 to 450 songs
and how much did you pay for your IPOD?
just the way you guys use them
you buy ur expensive IPODs
on one cd at 196KPS I can get 105 to 113 songs on one cd for around 13 to 18 cents per disc
if i go 48 to 96 i can get over 300 to 450 songs
and how much did you pay for your IPOD?
and my iPod is a whole lot more useful (to me anyway!). I don't have to keep track of any physical CDs and have access at any time to 600+ albums (6000+ songs) and a couple dozen audio books.Whatever works for you.
Senior Member
Joined: 01-06-2006
Posts: 224
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by Lee3333
What do you mean prehistoric? Now, if I said 'cassette deck' or '8-track'...
It was a joke...for anyone that doesn't know...check out the thread I started a bunch of threads down in this section...
Senior Member
Joined: 08-24-2005
Posts: 442
From: BalCo, MD
Senior Member
Joined: 12-18-2005
Posts: 1,791
From: Middle Village, NY
I know, snova031. But I still have my old 8 tracks. When the tape wasnt stretching, the sound quality was supposed to be better than on the cassettes since the tape speed was faster. But they did have a tendency to get eaten up. And the music always seemed to be in the middle of a song when it switched tracks. To this day, when I hear a song that I used to listen to on 8 track, I expect to hear the click-click sound at that point.
Senior Member
Joined: 01-06-2006
Posts: 224
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by Lee3333
I know, snova031. But I still have my old 8 tracks. When the tape wasnt stretching, the sound quality was supposed to be better than on the cassettes since the tape speed was faster. But they did have a tendency to get eaten up. And the music always seemed to be in the middle of a song when it switched tracks. To this day, when I hear a song that I used to listen to on 8 track, I expect to hear the click-click sound at that point.
