2.2 vs 2.4..and other help
#1
2.2 vs 2.4..and other help
Won't go thru my intro again...it's in the intro thread. Bottom line, I am considering the HHR as a second car, probably an '05 or '06 (budget considerations). Can someone give me an idea of what I should be looking for here? I live in the mountains (7000') and I need to handle the ups and downs around here. Should I disregard the 2.2 in favor of the 2.4? How can you tell which engine from just looking at one (without lifting the bonnet). Were 05/06 good years for these guys? I'm impressed with the HHR on paper. Others being considered are Matrix/Vibe and Mazda 3. Obviously I'm looking for hatchback with plenty of room for my 3 dogs in back, 4 doors, gas sipper (if they exist). Also looking for comfort on 5-6 hour trips.
I understand these guys pretty good in the snow w/proper rubber. We have a crossover AWD and work our own schedules, so this is not too much a factor. This change will take some getting used to. I'm coming off a 7.3 PSD Excursion. I can always go to Subaru, but I'm tired of them. Also want to get away from timing belts...understand the HHR has timing chain(s). Thanks for your help.
I understand these guys pretty good in the snow w/proper rubber. We have a crossover AWD and work our own schedules, so this is not too much a factor. This change will take some getting used to. I'm coming off a 7.3 PSD Excursion. I can always go to Subaru, but I'm tired of them. Also want to get away from timing belts...understand the HHR has timing chain(s). Thanks for your help.
#2
Good luck on finding a 05. first year was 06. We happen to own a hhr and a mazda 3. The mazda is not nearly as good on gas as ths hhr. 2.4 will have more power in ths hills. Dont know how the altitiude affectz them as i live in the flat state of florida. I find the 2.2 to be adequate.
Also the hhr has a higher roof line then the others to help accommodate your dogs.
Also the hhr has a higher roof line then the others to help accommodate your dogs.
#3
Yep...been thinking about 05 and 06 stuff so just erroneously stuck with it. I just saw an 06 advert, but photo shows an SS emblem. Thought they didn't come out until 08. SS not so good on MPG I would guess. The ads I'm going through are posted on local TV classifieds, so lots of mistakes.
#4
SS was only made in 08 09 10. And they do great on gas. Really about the same as a normal hhr, maybe one mpg less. But you have to keep your foot out of it to get that. If you drive it easy they do real good
#5
#7
I'm at 7200 ft elevation and my 2.4L has great power. My niece had a 2003 Grand Am with the 2.2L. I drove it a few times and it was also fine for roughly the same weight, so I think you'll be fine either way. These Ecotec engines are very torquey. I know a lot of people complain about the quality of the HHR, but my 2006 has been very easy to own so far.
I also had a 2005 Pontiac Vibe and it was a nice car, but the 1.8L is underpowered compared to the 2.2L or the 2.4L. Still, it was adequate, but I ended up having to sell it when I needed something to tow our new camper.
I also had a 2005 Pontiac Vibe and it was a nice car, but the 1.8L is underpowered compared to the 2.2L or the 2.4L. Still, it was adequate, but I ended up having to sell it when I needed something to tow our new camper.
#10
Technically, premium is recommended for the 2.4, but it will run (albeit with poorer fuel economy and reduced power) on regular. The 2LT trim gives heated leather seats, 2.4L, and 17-inch alloys, I believe.