Fuel Economy - Hypermiling Dedicated to discussions on fuel economy improvements and related modifications.

Gas Mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #201  
Clevelandhhrss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-31-2008
Posts: 772
From: CLEVELAND
Originally Posted by madmaxx
Have a 2007 2LT - consistently get 30-31 on hiway. Use the cruise control which is a must with any car to get best fuel economy. If you have a lot of hills which cause downshift, you will see a drop in mpg. One of the advantages of a lrger engine is less downshift and better economy. My G6 consistenly gets 31-33 highway with the 3.5l engine. The 2.4l in the HHR gets lsightly less.
You can easily beat cruise mpg on the highway if there are hills of even slight grades. However this will require more attention than most (including myself) are willing to give. The difference in 18-28mpg g6 4dr 3.5l v6 and 21-28mpg hhr 2.4l 4cyl, both autos, will be minimal if any because of the similar cd, and weight. The bigger engine almost always loses in the city, and the extra torque and probably better gearing (or simply being able to hold a higher gear at a given uphill grade) will help the g6 out on the highway. Do you live in a hilly area??
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #202  
i like!'s Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-2008
Posts: 27
From: canada
i'm surprised at the low mileage people.
i've had this thing for about two months, and the lowest the DIC ever went was 23mpg 100% city driving(2.4LT manual with 87 octane). it has 57, 000 miles on it, 17 inch tires(higher rolling resistance), and i'm not afraid to punch it once in a while(although i've been accelerating more slowly cause i love watching the MPG go higher and higher).
i drove behind a big rig(not draughting, really, he was two seconds ahead) for the last hour of a long trip, and reset the DIC. i picked this particular truck, because he had a heavy load. so, when he went up a hill, he would slow from 60 down to 55 or 50. if i drove like that with no big truck in front of me as an excuse, everyone would be honking at me and gettin' all aggressive and angry, so that's why i stayed behind him. driving in this style, the MPG climbed and climbed all the way up to FORTY THREE MILES PER GALLON!!! i couldn't believe it. there were two adults, two teenagers, and a 5 yr. old with all our luggage stacked as high as the headrests.

if i drive at 70-75 MPH, i get around 32 MPG, 34-36 MPG at 60- 65 MPH. driving conservative(keep her in fifth gear as much as possible), i can get 26 in the city.

this thing rocks. i only joined the forum to tell the world(of disappointed hhr owners...*boggle!*...who posted sad economy numbers) how amazing it is.

although i'm canadian, this is an american vehicle(perhaps from a police auction or something). i'm old enough to remember what a mile is, and i love the miles per hour and miles per gallon thing. adds to the retro feel, eh!?

cheers, y'all.
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 01:09 AM
  #203  
Clevelandhhrss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-31-2008
Posts: 772
From: CLEVELAND
Right on -i like!-....Many of us are surprised at low mileage.
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 01:17 PM
  #204  
VictorySpark08's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-29-2008
Posts: 839
From: Crystal Lake
I Can't complain Bought my 08 Last weekend and went to IN for the 4th. HHR has 180 miles on it when i left. I avg 26.1mpg doing 80mph 50% of the time i was on the Express way.
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 04:08 AM
  #205  
LARRYREDHHR's Avatar
 
Joined: 07-18-2008
Posts: 4
From: FARMINGDALE,NY
Mileage

I noticed a vast improvement in mileage after 6,000 miles, another increase after 8,000 miles. I get lower mileage with the Alcohol (10%) then regular gas. I have the 2.4 H2 auto. I get 24 arround town and 30+ on the highway. If you use the auto start the mileage is lower. I also have the factory 17" wheeles.
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 04:13 AM
  #206  
LARRYREDHHR's Avatar
 
Joined: 07-18-2008
Posts: 4
From: FARMINGDALE,NY
vast differance in mileage between 89 and 92 octane gas,3 to 4 mpg
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #207  
Smoke Wagon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-01-2008
Posts: 991
From: Windsor, Ca
89 octane
70% freeway
20%around town
10% bumper-to-bumper traffic/idling
06 2LT

current avg MPG is 29.9

I've hit 30.5

I have not reset my DIC fuel AVG meter in 80+ days.
I drive it 5 days a week as a commuter, + weekends.

if my car got any less than 26, I'd sell it. That's the whole reason I parked my 4000 lb V8 25.8 mpg Lincoln Mark VIII...was for better fuel mileage. If my 2.4 liter 2LT couldnt beat a 14+ yr old domestic V8 in fuel efficiency, it wouldnt be in my driveway.
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 05:31 PM
  #208  
Clevelandhhrss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-31-2008
Posts: 772
From: CLEVELAND
Originally Posted by LARRYREDHHR
vast differance in mileage between 89 and 92 octane gas,3 to 4 mpg
I've noticed none. Cruise at 60mph, flat road, warm day, little wind, 35+psi tires, no a/c.....36mpg.....for hundreds of miles, 87 octane and the exact same on 94 in a TURBO SS.....
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 08:01 PM
  #209  
Old Lar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-11-2007
Posts: 1,379
From: Palm Bay, Florida
I've never seen any mpg difference with 93 octane vs 87 octane except my wallet get lighter using 93 octane.
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 10:04 AM
  #210  
ZTony8's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-11-2008
Posts: 663
From: Eastpointe,MI.
Bumped up to 89 octane from 87 and saw a slight mileage increase(which may or may not be attributable to racking up miles on the car-just a bit over 1750 as of today)but haven't detected any performance improvement.Will be trying some 93 soon to see if there's any mileage/performance improvement.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 AM.