General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

Is the 2.4 worth the extra money?

Old Mar 3, 2010 | 09:23 PM
  #11  
urbexHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-16-2009
Posts: 6,038
From: Frankenmuth/Flint, MI
I don't see anything wrong with my 2.2. My mom's G6 has a 2.4 and it is more peppy, but I've never driven an HHR with it. Let me put it this way... If they have one you like with a 2.4, take it. But don't settle on something else just so you get that engine.
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 09:25 PM
  #12  
spirited driver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-2009
Posts: 191
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by CrazyCarKid
I don't see anything wrong with my 2.2. My mom's G6 has a 2.4 and it is more peppy, but I've never driven an HHR with it. Let me put it this way... If they have one you like with a 2.4, take it. But don't settle on something else just so you get that engine.
I do agree with this. It's all what's most important to you, no one else. But we'll miss you in the 2.4 forum J/K
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 10:06 PM
  #13  
squierjosh's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-23-2010
Posts: 18
From: MN
Yeah, I could probably live with the 2.2. I'll have to test drive a 2.4 just to make sure, but it's probably not enough to make a difference to me.

Originally Posted by CrazyCarKid
I don't see anything wrong with my 2.2. My mom's G6 has a 2.4 and it is more peppy, but I've never driven an HHR with it. Let me put it this way... If they have one you like with a 2.4, take it. But don't settle on something else just so you get that engine.
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:26 AM
  #14  
solman98's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-2006
Posts: 6,053
From: Dallas, GA
Originally Posted by spirited driver
No offense to the 2.2 guys, but when I read threads in the 2.2 section about increasing power, I Most times it seems it would've been cheaper to just get the 2.4...
No offense taken.... SInce mine is the 2.2 manual, my performance numbers are almost dead equal with the 2.4 auto with the 3.91 final drive ratio which was only available on the 06 model. So if your 2.4 auto is newer than the 06, your actually slower with the 3.31 final drive ratio.

Since the OP stated his last was a manual, I'd suggest the 2.2 5 speed. Cheaper by couple of thousand and personally, much more fun to drive. 4 cyl auto's are for people like my mother.

But, bottom line, you have to buy what you want.

Last edited by solman98; Mar 4, 2010 at 08:01 AM.
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:50 AM
  #15  
twistrman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-2008
Posts: 1,454
From: Indiana
i drove all 3, and although i wanted an SS i couldn't swing the price, and insurance, etc. The 2.2 was sluggish to me and the 2.4 was right in the middle.

I have never used premium in mine, still has a lot of pep. It is not required but i guess it's recommended but i don't really see why it is recommended in a little 4 cylinder...
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:08 AM
  #16  
urbexHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-16-2009
Posts: 6,038
From: Frankenmuth/Flint, MI
Originally Posted by twistrman
i don't really see why it is recommended in a little 4 cylinder...
The G6 mentions nothing about premium, and it's the same engine...
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 04:04 PM
  #17  
djr1973's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-11-2009
Posts: 2,116
From: Weston, Ohio
My HHR has the 2.4, and my wife has the same year pontiac G6 with the 2.4, and Ive noticed that her 2.4 seems to be a lil bit peppier than the one in my HHR. I am not sure if it is just because of the way her car is geared different than mine or if the G6 has better air flow because of a different set up on the air filter and intake set up?? I run 89 octane in mine most of the time, and the same with the wifes G6.
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #18  
djr1973's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-11-2009
Posts: 2,116
From: Weston, Ohio
Oh, the reason they say to run the higher octane is because of the higher compression ratio of that 4 cyl.
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 04:22 PM
  #19  
urbexHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-16-2009
Posts: 6,038
From: Frankenmuth/Flint, MI
Originally Posted by djr1973
Oh, the reason they say to run the higher octane is because of the higher compression ratio of that 4 cyl.
But why doesn't it say the G6 needs it?
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 04:54 PM
  #20  
squierjosh's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-23-2010
Posts: 18
From: MN
Manual won't work - wife refuses to learn. This is the main reason I'm in the market for a new car.

Originally Posted by solman98
No offense taken.... SInce mine is the 2.2 manual, my performance numbers are almost dead equal with the 2.4 auto with the 3.91 final drive ratio which was only available on the 06 model. So if your 2.4 auto is newer than the 06, your actually slower with the 3.31 final drive ratio.

Since the OP stated his last was a manual, I'd suggest the 2.2 5 speed. Cheaper by couple of thousand and personally, much more fun to drive. 4 cyl auto's are for people like my mother.

But, bottom line, you have to buy what you want.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 AM.