General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

Am considering an HHR. Need to state my feelings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 11:47 AM
  #31  
20vtguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 10-02-2007
Posts: 58
From: NY
Originally Posted by Goose
I've owned American and Foreign and have had my issues with both...my last car was Toyota Matrix and except for the clock bugging out and my window falling off the track (both fixed under warranty) it gave me 64K trouble free miles in a year and a half.

For the $$ I paid for the HHR I am pleased...the fit and finish is not what the Toyota was but the Matrix was not exactly put together like a Lexus either. The HHR stickered for over 21K...I got it for just over 16K with leather, boards, 6 CD, fogs etc..so yes essentially an econo box with some real cool styling and nice options for what I would call little $$ for a new car.

Has some quirks right now...noiser than expected engine, wind noise...some weird howling noise that sounds like it is coming from the windshield and a bit of a vibration in the gas pedal....

BUT the engine runs great despite the noises and I get anywhere form 30-35 mpg fuel economy..my UOA's show the engine is in great condition with very little wear metals. GM did something right with the Ecotec..very reliable and well made engine

I am one of those vocal guys who will notice things but I'd more than likely saying the same thing about a 50K dollar car as well so for 16K I'll keep my money and be ahead of the game


Goose
Goose, you think realistically which is how I do. You understand what you were giving up and understood what you gaining. You weighed the good and bad and decided what you can live with.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 12:22 PM
  #32  
20vtguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 10-02-2007
Posts: 58
From: NY
Originally Posted by Lone Ranger
Wife's car is a 2005 VW Beetle TDI (diesel). As far as build quality and quantity of plastic I see no difference between it and the HHR. VW coats some of their interior plastic with dulso or similar rubberized compound, but its still plastic. Knocking a modern car for having plastic in the interior is like knocking an apple tree for those big red round things that fall off and hit you on the head-- Majority of modern vehicles have plastic interiors, I guess its how they approach the layout and appearance of all that plastic that effects peoples opinions about that particular car. "Plastic is fantastic" is the moto of auto makers.
I will agree with you on the coated plastic. It was not VW best idea due to peeling. But they use very little of it. Unfortunately they used it in places where it gets easily scratched. Door handles and around radio and steering column. My entire lower dash on my GTI and glovebox is an uncoated plastic that has a soft quality to it that you would think its coated but its not. It almost feels like vinyl and it does not peel. The entire front and top of the dash all the way to the windshield is a soft padded material with amazing fit and finish and texture. Doors use a nicely finished vinyl on top and a padded cloth material in its midsection. All of this came on even the base Jetta and Golf in the 16k-17k price range. Even the new gen of Golfs aka Rabbits and Jettas have this same high quality feel and I believe they eliminated the coated plastic. I can say I don't like the texture of the materials as much on gen. Prefer the grain pattern of the last gen. But still high quality. The Beetle was an exception and they used more plastic but that was mostly to try and get a retrolook without using steel since the old beetle had alot of exposed painted steel.


My experience with import brands is limited to a 1986 Isuzu P'up 4x4 truck and our VW, as well as some test drives of import brand compacts during the time we were looking and eventually bought the TDI. The Isuzu was very tin like, talk about thin guage of metal! The 2.3L SOHC engine was very raspy even in midrange. A friend had a Toyota 4x4 truck of the same year, and another had a Mazda 4x2 truck of the same year-- both were similar to the feel of the Isuzu with the Toyota maybe feeling a bit better of the three.
The 70's and 80's Asian cars were tinny and buzzy but they were extremely reliable compared to their American counterparts.


Drove a 2005 Corolla LE and a 2005 Civic EX And a Nissan Sentra during the shopping time before the TDI. The Corolla had no power, although build quality felt good if not a bit spartan (and yes, plasticy). The Civic reminded us too much of a 1996 Dodge Neon we used to have (POS car that one), same raspy engine and poor sound insulation in the cabin (road and drive train noise galore in the Civic). The Sentra felt tight and the engine was queiter and power not too bad but it was just too blah looking especially the rear fascia (but Nissa did a great job with the re-style for 2007, very good looking). I was against a Beetle initially but the wife always wanted one. My sister at the time had a diesel Mercedes and was very pro-diesel, and got me to check out the VW TDI diesels. So we checked out a Jetta, nice but too much $$ for what we had to spend. Ended up getting the Beetle TDI but I will say that it has buzzes and rattles in the interior but that is mainly due to the high torque TDI 1.9-- around the torque peak @ 2000 rpm a symphony of muted buzzes of plastic-on-plastic and something inside the passenger door begins to serenade you until about 2300 rpm. That's the only complaint though-- 42mpg around town and almost 50 on the road with 177lb-ft torque @ 2000 rpm makes up for the interior's plastic symphony.
You are pretty accurate on your assessment of the Corolla and with the Civic I can't imagine how it reminded you of a Neon.


And as far as most of the things Karen1953 cited, well those are intrinsic to the retro styling and not quality issues-- the shallow windshield and thick roof pillars (which limit outward visibility), running boards, etc., are the price of the designer's pen strokes (or CAD pixels) when he artfully created the body style for HHR.
I didn't fault the HHR for those because I knew it was due to styling not quality. Not sure what her beef was with the runningboards. I did not find an issue with them, though on one I looked at they were poorly fitted and seemed to bow inward in the center.[/QUOTE]

In the end, I think you have to also concede the class of vehicle the HHR is: entry level. GM intends it to appeal to buyers looking in the entry level class who want max style and value for their limited dollars they intend to spend. I think HHR delivers in those areas, and quality, very well.
Entry level does not have to mean cutting corners on assembly and fit and finish. The current VW Rabbit has been raved about for its upscale quality interior and features at a bargain price.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 12:25 PM
  #33  
ICUFOS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-2007
Posts: 114
From: Minooka, Ill
Originally Posted by 20vtguy
I will agree with you on the coated plastic. It was not VW best idea due to peeling. But they use very little of it. Unfortunately they used it in places where it gets easily scratched. Door handles and around radio and steering column. My entire lower dash on my GTI and glovebox is an uncoated plastic that has a soft quality to it that you would think its coated but its not. It almost feels like vinyl and it does not peel. The entire front and top of the dash all the way to the windshield is a soft padded material with amazing fit and finish and texture. Doors use a nicely finished vinyl on top and a padded cloth material in its midsection. All of this came on even the base Jetta and Golf in the 16k-17k price range. Even the new gen of Golfs aka Rabbits and Jettas have this same high quality feel and I believe they eliminated the coated plastic. I can say I don't like the texture of the materials as much on gen. Prefer the grain pattern of the last gen. But still high quality. The Beetle was an exception and they used more plastic but that was mostly to try and get a retrolook without using steel since the old beetle had alot of exposed painted steel.



The 70's and 80's Asian cars were tinny and buzzy but they were extremely reliable compared to their American counterparts.




You are pretty accurate on your assessment of the Corolla and with the Civic I can't imagine how it reminded you of a Neon.




I didn't fault the HHR for those because I knew it was due to styling not quality. Not sure what her beef was with the runningboards. I did not find an issue with them, though on one I looked at they were poorly fitted and seemed to bow inward in the center.



Entry level does not have to mean cutting corners on assembly and fit and finish. The current VW Rabbit has been raved about for its upscale quality interior and features at a bargain price.

It sounds like you know what you want... It's not a hhr so move on! I don't any issues with my hhr, fit and finish seems to be good. Looks great, tons of useable cargo space , many standard features, good mpg and good price.

I’m happy!

Last edited by ICUFOS; Oct 5, 2007 at 01:11 PM.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #34  
Snoopy's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-09-2006
Posts: 6,805
From: "Upland" Mesa, Arizona
Originally Posted by ICUFOS
Entry level does not have to mean cutting corners on assembly and fit and finish. The current VW Rabbit has been raved about for its upscale quality interior and features at a bargain price.

I agree with you on this comment. And ALL the vehicle manufacturers agree with you.....although SOME have not reached an acceptable and recognized level, yet.

I tried to make that same point in another thread regarding "Quality" many months ago. Many people are to stubborn to understand it.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #35  
hhrcrafty's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-24-2006
Posts: 1,761
From: The Show-Me State
Originally Posted by Kingfrog
I have to say you are indeed biased by your GM connection. There is no way you can compare the HHR in fit and finish on a favorable level to a Jetta or BMW, or Toyota. And to compare the Ecotech to a Honda engine on any level is more than a stretch of logic.

Every time I pull the door handle I think it's going to come off..........

Don't get me wrong I love this car for the money I paid But I know what it is and what it's not, It's not a Jetta and certainly does not run as silky smooth or sound as sleek as Honda. It is a very practical car with unusual style, lots of space and creature comforts and is fun to drive.
Really? You don't say...

Every Honda and Toyota I've ever driven has sounded like it was going to die trying to get up to 60 MPH. Harsh ride, uncomfortable seats, and cheap looking plastic and fabric galore. The new Camrys make me want to vomit with their ultra-ultra cheap appointments. When I was selling cars, we actually made it a point NOT to sell used VWs unless we absolutely had to because of the 5-day return policy. Nobody wanted to risk losing that commission on such a craptastic make.

BTW, the door handle on my girlfriend's Camry DID come off in her hand two weeks ago $200 to fix it, too!

You know, I live in rural MO, and I see a lot of 22 year old American cars running around because the people maintain them and keep 'em going.

Like I said, I'd compare the Ecotec to any Honda or Toyota engine any day. It is truly a world-class engine.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #36  
20vtguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 10-02-2007
Posts: 58
From: NY
Since we are talking about quality interiors. Has anyone seen the inside of the Jeep Commander? Here is vehicle that is supposed to be the luxury Jeep above the Grand Cherokee. Talk about cheap looking plastic interior. At that pricepoint there is no excuse. But I like the outside of it. Like the boxy masculine retro jeep look.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #37  
chooch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-29-2007
Posts: 229
From: canada
Smile be fair and honest.

i agree completely with 20vgt----i own a 2004 honda civic coupe and the fit and finish/reliability and mechanical elements are excellent. It is also a basic economy car and i took my time researching it before i bought it. Basically i am bored by it now and i love the chevy HHR 's style and convenience. I checked out the interior of the hhr and its just ok for the price. I bet that by 2009 model year, the hhr will have a completely redesigned interior with superb materials...just like the current general motors vehicles out right now. For me, its a waiting game of trading my honda in for the chevy lt or turbo edition, or holding off for one more year for further improvements which will come. Lets not knock down 20vgt for his honest comments on why/why not to buy a new hhr. I too have owned about 10 different vehicles of american and japanese heritage and i also have driven every car/truck/suv out there as i work in the automotive trade. Every automaker has had a inferior and superior vehicle made at some point. Its all about what you can afford and what you are willing to live with for the price/style etc.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:29 PM
  #38  
20vtguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 10-02-2007
Posts: 58
From: NY
Originally Posted by hhrcrafty
Really? You don't say...

Every Honda and Toyota I've ever driven has sounded like it was going to die trying to get up to 60 MPH. Harsh ride, uncomfortable seats, and cheap looking plastic and fabric galore. The new Camrys make me want to vomit with their ultra-ultra cheap appointments. When I was selling cars, we actually made it a point NOT to sell used VWs unless we absolutely had to because of the 5-day return policy. Nobody wanted to risk losing that commission on such a craptastic make.

BTW, the door handle on my girlfriend's Camry DID come off in her hand two weeks ago $200 to fix it, too!

You know, I live in rural MO, and I see a lot of 22 year old American cars running around because the people maintain them and keep 'em going.

Like I said, I'd compare the Ecotec to any Honda or Toyota engine any day. It is truly a world-class engine.
Can't imagine what sort of Honda or Toyota you drove to make that statement about getting to 60mph, other than maybe a base Civic or Corolla or Scion XA or XB. Though I drove a auto 2.2 1LT and it was quite weak in that department as well. Waiting to drive a 2.4 before I make a decision but want to drive a 5 speed which are so hard to come by according to the salesman I spoke to at Chevy. He said he could build me one of I want but I want to drive a 2.4 stick before I make my decision. Also not sure how much I will like the stick in the HHR. Love VW and Honda sticks. Never liked the feel of Toyota sticks in the past. And hated the sticks in all the American cars in the past but haven't driven American sticks in a long time so I will not judge at this point with the Cobalt platform until I give it a fair shake. As far as cheap fabric and plastic in the curent Camry. I have not looked at them since the body change so I will check that out. Seems the current reviews support your statement. In the past Camrys have always had amazing interiors, though I used to hate their new car smell. Way to chemical smelling, at least in the cloth interiors.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:31 PM
  #39  
Kingfrog's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 08-25-2007
Posts: 488
From: Myrtle Beach SC
Originally Posted by chooch
i agree completely with 20vgt----i own a 2004 honda civic coupe and the fit and finish/reliability and mechanical elements are excellent. It is also a basic economy car and i took my time researching it before i bought it. Basically i am bored by it now and i love the chevy HHR 's style and convenience. I checked out the interior of the hhr and its just ok for the price. I bet that by 2009 model year, the hhr will have a completely redesigned interior with superb materials...just like the current general motors vehicles out right now. For me, its a waiting game of trading my honda in for the chevy lt or turbo edition, or holding off for one more year for further improvements which will come. Lets not knock down 20vgt for his honest comments on why/why not to buy a new hhr. I too have owned about 10 different vehicles of american and japanese heritage and i also have driven every car/truck/suv out there as i work in the automotive trade. Every automaker has had a inferior and superior vehicle made at some point. Its all about what you can afford and what you are willing to live with for the price/style etc.
Thats would be the only complaint I have about the Asians fare. Boring. Rock solid.

The difference is this

The Japanese hold their vendors to a high standard. Not the lowest bidder. If they have to pay 1.00 more for a part to last longer they did. Theor attentions have paid off in real reliability.

The American builders will do the exact opposite.)Thank you UAW) If they can put a cheaper part in a car and save a $1.00 they will as long as it can get past the Bumper to bumper warranty requirement.

An example on the HHR are the door lock shafts, Rather then machining a threaded top they are made to SELF TAP PLASTIC!!! I know of no Asian car that does not have machined door lock shafts. Its a small thing but screams loud about cutting corners and begs the question where else have they cut corners besides what i can see?
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:35 PM
  #40  
20vtguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 10-02-2007
Posts: 58
From: NY
Originally Posted by chooch
i agree completely with 20vgt----i own a 2004 honda civic coupe and the fit and finish/reliability and mechanical elements are excellent. It is also a basic economy car and i took my time researching it before i bought it. Basically i am bored by it now and i love the chevy HHR 's style and convenience. I checked out the interior of the hhr and its just ok for the price. I bet that by 2009 model year, the hhr will have a completely redesigned interior with superb materials...just like the current general motors vehicles out right now. For me, its a waiting game of trading my honda in for the chevy lt or turbo edition, or holding off for one more year for further improvements which will come. Lets not knock down 20vgt becausfor his honest comments on why/why not to buy a new hhr. I too have owned about 10 different vehicles of american and japanese heritage and i also have driven every car/truck/suv out there as i work in the automotive trade. Every automaker has had a inferior and superior vehicle made at some point. Its all about what you can afford and what you are willing to live with for the price/style etc.
Hopefully in 2009 they won't abandon the HHR's cool retro exterior for something run of the mill. A nice thing would be to make it a bit larger while keeping its looks and maybe with a 48 inch width in the cargo area to accomodate sheets of plywood or sheetrock. AWD would be a great addition as well



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM.