Gas, Premium or Regular
Its a waste of time to try this test in colder weather, i.e. winter. Between the "winter" blend of gas, longer idle times (such as using the remote start), and warm up periods, you really can't establish a good baseline.
I don't factor in winter/cold weather simply because no car will run at its optimum in low temps, especially given the fact that we have to use an E10 "winter blend" . EPA testing is not done under those temps and conditions either. I get about 25 in winter. Its getting warmer here now, mid 50s, and in the last two weeks I went from 25 to 27 avg per fill up. It's not rocket science to understand that if I used regular in the winter, I would not get 25 but probably only 22 or 23. So the benefit of premium is still the same.
E10 is year round... what I'm saying is you tried to do a year round comparison on savings and its flawed! You have no idea what you will get under anyother condition with either gas. You might find because of weather the split is larger under one extreme compared to the other....for alll we know your comparison was done under ideal conditions with 93 and not so great with regular.(Popular means of comparison between competitors), intentional or not.What makes me question is the ratio of those who say yes against those who say not enough to make it worthwhile.Who knows maybe YOU got lucky and YOUR car is different in some way to take advantage of this, others may not be.Maybe your timing is on one end of the spectrum where reg does not work so well, or the compression is slightly higher where as the knock sensor is working overtime on reg gas..or maybe your not so lucky.............
Also check your math..it cost 9 cent a mile on 91 and 8.9 cent on reg at a 2 mpg split......
Also check your math..it cost 9 cent a mile on 91 and 8.9 cent on reg at a 2 mpg split......
E10 is year round... what I'm saying is you tried to do a year round comparison on savings and its flawed! You have no idea what you will get under anyother condition with either gas. You might find because of weather the split is larger under one extreme compared to the other....for alll we know your comparison was done under ideal conditions with 93 and not so great with regular.(Popular means of comparison between competitors), intentional or not.What makes me question is the ratio of those who say yes against those who say not enough to make it worthwhile.Who knows maybe YOU got lucky and YOUR car is different in some way to take advantage of this, others may not be.Maybe your timing is on one end of the spectrum where reg does not work so well, or the compression is slightly higher where as the knock sensor is working overtime on reg gas..or maybe your not so lucky.............
Also check your math..it cost 9 cent a mile on 91 and 8.9 cent on reg at a 2 mpg split......
Also check your math..it cost 9 cent a mile on 91 and 8.9 cent on reg at a 2 mpg split......
BTW, this is not the first premium optional car I have owned. My old Catera did not get better mileage or performance on premium. It did run smother though. So I compromised and ran mid-grade in it.
I guess I'm not really getting why you are pressing so hard on this.
With the option of 3 grades, I typically try a full tank of each and calculate the milage and make note of the performance differences. I have found on 2 previous GM vehicles I owned that the mid grade was worth the extra money.


