General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

Solid Performance Engine Mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #11  
DLVRNIT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-29-2008
Posts: 936
From: NorCal BayArea
Originally Posted by prod
These would probably be for the SS (sporty minded folks), I do believe the 2.0 mounts are significantly different from the 2.2/2.4.
HMM,

Kinda thought they would be one in the same ? Like I tell the Wife, "That's What I Get for Thinking" !

Happy Holidays,
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 04:41 PM
  #12  
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: 10-08-2007
Posts: 1,821
From: Minnesota
Well believe it or not they are the same as the cobalt :)

We have them on sale right now @ www.TurboTechRacing.com

Manual trans upper engine mounts are $149.99
Auto trans upper engine mount are $189.99

Cobalt manual trans uses the same mount as the HHR manual trans

Cobalt auto trans uses the same mount as the HHR auto trans

We have both ready to ship.

These will help get the power to the ground and help eliminate power loss through sloppy stock mounts. Only side effect is slight vibs at idle.

You may look on www.TurboTechRacing.com under the "cobalt/drivtrain" or you may PM us for more info.
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #13  
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: 10-08-2007
Posts: 1,821
From: Minnesota
TTT Thanks for recent orders, please post when you order.
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 06:34 PM
  #14  
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: 10-08-2007
Posts: 1,821
From: Minnesota
TTT Bump, please post when you order.
Old Jan 3, 2009 | 06:37 PM
  #15  
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: 10-08-2007
Posts: 1,821
From: Minnesota
Thanks for all the supporters who have recently purchased.
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 07:16 AM
  #16  
mistermike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-16-2008
Posts: 662
From: Cleveland, Ohio
If any of you have ever had solid mounts on a daily driver, you may be in for a big disappointment. The vibration transmitted to the body is often staggering. Some cars are worse than others, but the Ecotek isn't a particularly quiet motor.

There is no loss of power through a flexible motor mount. Generally, racers will go to solid mounts or torque chains to keep from breaking rubber mounts at launch. The price you pay for solid mounts is a lot more shock transmitted to the rest of the driveline. The tires become easier to break loose, and gear and bushing wear is increased due to the loss of "cushioning" in the elastic mounts. Polyurethane mounts are a reasonable compromise and are usually not annoying, depending on the durometer of the poly compound used. An Ingalls "stiffy" is also a possiblity if they choose to make one for this platform.
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 04:45 PM
  #17  
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: 10-08-2007
Posts: 1,821
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by mistermike
If any of you have ever had solid mounts on a daily driver, you may be in for a big disappointment. The vibration transmitted to the body is often staggering. Some cars are worse than others, but the Ecotek isn't a particularly quiet motor.
Very little vibrantions from these mounts. Many cobalt owners state that they hardly even notice any

Originally Posted by mistermike
There is no loss of power through a flexible motor mount. Generally, racers will go to solid mounts or torque chains to keep from breaking rubber mounts at launch. The price you pay for solid mounts is a lot more shock transmitted to the rest of the driveline. The tires become easier to break loose, and gear and bushing wear is increased due to the loss of "cushioning" in the elastic mounts. Polyurethane mounts are a reasonable compromise and are usually not annoying, depending on the durometer of the poly compound used. An Ingalls "stiffy" is also a possiblity if they choose to make one for this platform.
FYI these are not 100% metal to metal solid.

These would be the poly style. The Ingalls is a poor choice as MANY cobalt owners bend the brackets in the kit. The Turbo Tech Racing Mount does not have any structural issues.
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #18  
stranger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-22-2008
Posts: 391
From: G'town, MD
Originally Posted by mistermike
An Ingalls "stiffy" is also a possiblity if they choose to make one for this platform.
Had a stiffy in a Honda and it was the way to go....there was vibs but to me the bad was worth the good.......if they would come up with a stiffy I'd be first in line.....short throw, sway bars....yeah would be nice BUT GIVE ME A STIFFY.....d@mn now that just don't sound right.
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 05:05 PM
  #19  
TurboTechRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: 10-08-2007
Posts: 1,821
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by stranger
Had a stiffy in a Honda and it was the way to go....there was vibs but to me the bad was worth the good.......if they would come up with a stiffy I'd be first in line.....short throw, sway bars....yeah would be nice BUT GIVE ME A STIFFY.....d@mn now that just don't sound right.
The Cobalt stiffy will work on the HHR, as long as you get the "air box" out of the way.

Again it is not the most recommended product. Many purchased the Ingalls, and then replaced it with the Turbo Tech Racing Upper engine mount. They stated they would never go back to an Ingalls.
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 05:26 PM
  #20  
stranger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-22-2008
Posts: 391
From: G'town, MD
Originally Posted by TurboTechRacing
The Cobalt stiffy will work on the HHR, as long as you get the "air box" out of the way.

Again it is not the most recommended product. Many purchased the Ingalls, and then replaced it with the Turbo Tech Racing Upper engine mount. They stated they would never go back to an Ingalls.

How 'bout a SS ?????????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.