HHR SS Topics and information on the 2008-2010 Chevy HHR SS Turbocharged models.

RPD Accuracy?

Old 02-29-2016, 01:58 PM
  #1  
JSK
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
JSK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-26-2016
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 166
RPD Accuracy?

My RPD sure looks like it's peaking at 260-ish horsepower and 300+ lb/ft of torque when I floor it in 2nd gear and let her go to redline.


Do any of you gurus know if this is accurate? ...sure doesn't seem possible to be at the wheels, because my 5-speed car is stock (except for a K&N drop in filter w/original airbox).


I know the accelerometer can calculate these things (I bought a G-Tech Pro years ago that was very accurate). But the car can't know if I have passengers (extra weight), which would change the readings... etc etc


Thanks gentlemen!


(not sure if this is SS-Specific - please move to General Discussion if that's more appropriate)
JSK is offline  
Old 02-29-2016, 02:07 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
prod's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-14-2007
Location: Toronto ON Canada
Posts: 2,964
It uses engine data, so it's numbers are at the crank. And I would think it's calibrated to give the max numbers spec'd by gm.
prod is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 11:10 AM
  #3  
JSK
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
JSK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-26-2016
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 166
Thanks prod... I'll get out my old GTECH Pro and compare the numbers. I'll have to estimate the weight of the car since my scale only goes to 280lbs.
JSK is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 11:49 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
2005HHRauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-2009
Location: City of Champions
Posts: 666
Originally Posted by JSK
Thanks prod... I'll get out my old GTECH Pro and compare the numbers. I'll have to estimate the weight of the car since my scale only goes to 280lbs.
HHR SS weight = 2016 Camaro 2.0 turbo weight = 3,339 lbs...
2005HHRauto is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 11:57 AM
  #5  
Moderator
 
RJ_RS_SS_350's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-01-2014
Location: California
Posts: 7,787
Here is a discussion about it.
RJ_RS_SS_350 is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 02:43 PM
  #6  
JSK
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
JSK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-26-2016
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 166
Thanks guys! I entered 3,500 lbs with me in it, full tank of gas...eh, it's pretty close.


While the RPD showed 260 horsepower, the GTECH Pro showed 209. The peak was in 2nd gear, I guess at about 50mph or so.


BUT - I also am running too much E85 in my tank now. In efforts to get cheap premium gas, I put in 5 gallons of E85 with 11 gallons of 87 octane. No, I don't have an E47 tune or ANY tune - heh. I was just trying to get my octane requirements for cheap. In any case, this might be affecting how much horsepower is cranking outta there.
JSK is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 04:26 PM
  #7  
Platinum Member
 
firemangeorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-06-2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 11,087
Fwiw. I've seen my RPD show values of about 285hp and 310 lbs. torque.
Pretty close to the advertised claims of the 290hp, 315 tq for a HHR SS with the GMTU like mine.
firemangeorge is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 05:53 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
2005HHRauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-26-2009
Location: City of Champions
Posts: 666
Originally Posted by JSK
Thanks guys! I entered 3,500 lbs with me in it, full tank of gas...eh, it's pretty close.


While the RPD showed 260 horsepower, the GTECH Pro showed 209. The peak was in 2nd gear, I guess at about 50mph or so.


BUT - I also am running too much E85 in my tank now. In efforts to get cheap premium gas, I put in 5 gallons of E85 with 11 gallons of 87 octane. No, I don't have an E47 tune or ANY tune - heh. I was just trying to get my octane requirements for cheap. In any case, this might be affecting how much horsepower is cranking outta there.
5 gallons of E85 + 11 gallons of E10 = an E33 mixture, which I thought would be over the limits of the stock ECM ,'tune/program'. to handle.
If you're not getting any engine service lights, your ok, but you are definitely pushing the limits...
I've never tried anything over E25, on a stock ECM, 'tune/program', as the 'long-turn-fuel-trim', ( LTFT.),
will be close to being maxed out...
The LTFT can only 'swing', from -30 to +30, & if your maxed out at +30 with your E33 mix, on a stock 'tune', there's no room for corrections, if more fuel is needed, & you will run lean, & get 'service engine light/codes, & maybe blow-a-hole thru your piston ring-lands...
Therefore, if you're not getting any engine "codes", it's ok, & you will be making more horsepower with your E33 mix, but I won't push your engine, as you could go 'lean'...

At E20 , the 'mix' is strong enough to stop 'knocking', on any engine, & provide a nice power 'bump', your engine will run cooler, & smoother, go 500,000 miles , & still leave room for the ECM to provide corrections, during operational variables ...
And NO, Ethanol won't hurt your engine, as engines/fuel systems have been designed to handle Ethanol for the last 20 years...
I've been running a E47 mix for over 6 years now, with my best ET of 12.28 this past October...

So, anyone that has E85 available, should be running E22 in their 'buggy".
No tuning needed for E22
1 gallon of E85 + 5 gallons of E10 93 octane gasoline = E22
Always use 93 octane in the 'mix', for the octane 'bump' it provides, & the fact that we do have a turbocharger, that loves octane....
With all your other cars/trucks, without turbos/superchargers, you can use 87 octane gas in the E22 'mix'...

Last edited by 2005HHRauto; 03-03-2016 at 08:13 AM.
2005HHRauto is offline  
Old 03-08-2016, 05:07 AM
  #9  
JSK
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
JSK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-26-2016
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 166
Thanks for the very thorough explanation of what my risks are as a result of my "frugality!"


I'm not pushing the car much since I have BandAids on my intercooler outlet pipe. But I'm going to be much more careful, in any case! (still no check engine lights, either)


FWIW, after I put all that E85 in the tank, my Butt-Dyno seemed to show significantly LESS torque... even though the RPD numbers didn't change, it sure seems like the performance declined! The Steering-Dyno concurs -- under 11lbs of boost, the steering wheel really needed to be enthusiastically controlled. After the 5 gallons of E85, the torque-steer is minimal.


Interesting, no?
JSK is offline  
Old 03-08-2016, 07:21 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
DrLoch's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-07-2008
Location: Mebane, NC
Posts: 1,016
Sounds like you're having fun with it now. Fix the pipe put a tune in it and hang on to the steering wheel, or, make sure you have it pointed in a direction.
DrLoch is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IMPALADAKID
Fuel Economy - Hypermiling
19
07-08-2013 07:25 AM
wba
General HHR
0
05-16-2012 08:52 PM
texaselky
Fuel Economy - Hypermiling
22
11-25-2009 05:26 PM
Ken6432
General HHR
12
11-19-2008 08:26 PM
Rikki Sixx
Tires & Wheels
22
10-16-2008 10:44 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: RPD Accuracy?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 AM.