The Lounge Off Topic PG-13.
Warning: The Lounge may contain irrelevant and off topic discussions that may not be related to anything HHR. If you are not interested in these kinds of discussions, do not read or respond to these threads.

What camera do you use for web photos?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 09:15 PM
  #1  
mongo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-21-2008
Posts: 1,458
From: SE Michigan
What camera do you use for web photos?

One of the things I hate doing is resizing photos. It's easy enough in Linux on the command line with the resize command, but I prefer to just post pics straight from the camera.

Playing with camera setting to get a 640x480 pic size is posiible on some cameras, but often buried a few menus deep.

I have a different approach.

I use an old HP C200 camera, 1MP- native resolution is 640x480. So I pull out the CF card, pop it in the reader, and upload. Much easier.

I took this pic with the webcam on my laptop, since I can't take a pic of my camera I use for webshots with the camera I use for webshots....




I do have better cameras, but this does an admirable job for pics that are going to be posted in forums.


How do you get your web pics? :redXdance
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 09:32 PM
  #2  
urbexHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-16-2009
Posts: 6,038
From: Frankenmuth/Flint, MI
I don't take anything smaller than what the camera can allow. That way it saves the most detail and all, then I can scale back... I just use Photoshop CS3 for that.
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 09:33 PM
  #3  
HillsdaleHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-2006
Posts: 21,640
From: Hillsdale, Michigan
Originally Posted by CrazyCarKid
I don't take anything smaller than what the camera can allow. That way it saves the most detail and all, then I can scale back....
Agreed. You never know what picture you may want to print in full size
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #4  
twistrman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-2008
Posts: 1,454
From: Indiana
agreed as well. I use Aperture to manage all of my photos so it is 3 button clicks away to output any of the presets I set up. Or send them straight to email, or flickr, etc.

Actually you can take a photo with that camera, of that camera. Just need a mirror and enough light to not use a flash.
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 10:48 PM
  #5  
urbexHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-16-2009
Posts: 6,038
From: Frankenmuth/Flint, MI
Seeing that old camera reminds me of my friends digital camera...it was the first one I had ever seen, and we would always play with it. Gosh... that was probably back in '01 or so, so what 9 years ago. It was an HP, and it used floppy disks! The file sizes were probably small, terrible quality, and it only fit I think 20-30 pictures per floppy!
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 10:54 PM
  #6  
urbexHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-16-2009
Posts: 6,038
From: Frankenmuth/Flint, MI
Actually, I take that back...it was a Sony:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=310210563777

Being a photographer, I collect old cameras. Figured with the sentimental value, I had to add one of these to my collection!
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #7  
Father Azmodius's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-2009
Posts: 837
From: D.C., Md., Va. area
Originally Posted by twistrman
agreed as well. I use Aperture to manage all of my photos so it is 3 button clicks away to output any of the presets I set up. Or send them straight to email, or flickr, etc.

Actually you can take a photo with that camera, of that camera. Just need a mirror and enough light to not use a flash.
Ahhh, a fellow Mac user.

I shoot with a Sigma SD14 for most situations. It doesn't have a lot of bells and whistles, but the color reproduction is amazing. For action shots I pull out the old Minolta 7D, but it has been having issues more frequently as of late. Maybe I need a new Nikon, or maybe, just maybe, I could spend that money on a new turbo, and some IC pipes, an IC. I could go on, but I think I hear the alarm, time to wake up.
Old Apr 2, 2010 | 12:13 AM
  #8  
sleeper's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 01-09-2007
Posts: 16,081
From: SE USA
One I use is my Olympus "Camedia" C-5000ZOOM, it can take better pics than I can shoot..
Old Apr 2, 2010 | 05:23 AM
  #9  
Greybeard999's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-06-2010
Posts: 6,869
From: Ohio
I still use my Sony Mavica........ Guess I belong in a museum as well?
Old Apr 2, 2010 | 05:49 AM
  #10  
BlackknighT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-29-2009
Posts: 1,813
From: Long Island, NY
For great color shots (flowers & macro shots) I love to use my old Olympus C3030.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0001/00...mpusc3030z.asp

All my other pics are from a Canon S5iS. I have multiple thread on lenses & filters, from ultra wide, 4 steps of macro, and super zoom. I couldn't afford an SLR-so this was as close as I could get.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons5is/

Love both cameras & sometimes use an original Canon AE1 film camera (Moms) with a manual superzoom lense & tripod.

Even most newer low end digitals perform great. For $80 you can get a great all around one. Add a cheap photo fix program and your good to go.

It's not having the best camera-it's how you use the camera you can afford.
Mike



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.