GM Performance Parts Intake
02-28-2008, 08:20 AM
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-11-2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 299
I'm sorry I need to sleep sometime...LOL
It is a LOT better than the CGS intake, throttle response is a lot smoother and there isn't a "dead spot", or hesitation that I had with the CGS.
I truly believe the dyno that was posted, because with the GMPP intake it pulls a LOT harder than with the CGS.
I get tourquesteer a lot more with the GMPP than the CGS too (not saying that is any indication of performance) since i did no before or after dynos im not going to make any claims but it seems to be a LOT better than the CGS system.
Also the biggest difference with the GMPP intake is the noise. It has a deeper more powerful tone and is much quieter than the CGS, I am assuming this is in large part to the lid over the filter vs. an open element.
It is a LOT better than the CGS intake, throttle response is a lot smoother and there isn't a "dead spot", or hesitation that I had with the CGS.
I truly believe the dyno that was posted, because with the GMPP intake it pulls a LOT harder than with the CGS.
I get tourquesteer a lot more with the GMPP than the CGS too (not saying that is any indication of performance) since i did no before or after dynos im not going to make any claims but it seems to be a LOT better than the CGS system.
Also the biggest difference with the GMPP intake is the noise. It has a deeper more powerful tone and is much quieter than the CGS, I am assuming this is in large part to the lid over the filter vs. an open element.
02-28-2008, 09:48 AM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-21-2007
Location: Bass Lake, CA
Posts: 565
Well, he is referring to the fact that he feels that the GM intake performs much better than the CGS. He refers to "the dyno that was posted" and says "he believes it"- which many people didn't when it was first posted. If there was a dyno on the GM intake, I'm pretty sure everyone here would know about it and there would be a thread with 300 posts. Dyno info is rare on this site. His comments make perfect sense when referring to the CGS dyno posted last summer
But Premiere07 can clear it up if he feels like it.
02-28-2008, 09:54 AM
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-17-2006
Location: Dallas, GA
Posts: 6,050
Well, he is referring to the fact that he feels that the GM intake performs much better than the CGS. He refers to "the dyno that was posted" and says "he believes it"- which many people didn't when it was first posted. If there was a dyno on the GM intake, I'm pretty sure everyone here would know about it and there would be a thread with 300 posts. Dyno info is rare on this site. His comments make perfect sense when referring to the CGS dyno posted last summer
But Premiere07 can clear it up if he feels like it.
SInce he is the first, I believe, to actually have this intake, he may (or may not) have a link for a dyno sheet for it.
