2.0L Performance Tech 260hp (235hp auto) Turbocharged SS tuner version. 260 lb-ft of torque

Air Box.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 12:27 PM
  #1  
JRGHHRSS08's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-17-2010
Posts: 161
From: Stow, Ohio
Air Box.

Is it okay to drive with out the cover on the air box? I have no clue exactly what the air box even does so if someone would be so kind to inform me that would be great!!

Thanks
-JG
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 03:43 PM
  #2  
SPPD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-29-2008
Posts: 527
From: Suburban Chicago
Been lots of discussion on this in the past.

https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/show...ghlight=airbox

SPPD
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 12:16 AM
  #3  
Programmer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-2008
Posts: 123
From: Victoria
I've tried driving without the airbox cover, and have also discussed it with Vince from Trifecta tuning. He has an HHR SS, and has done this to his own car.

It does raise the intake air temperature, because it's no longer pulling cold air from outside the engine bay. Vince told me that the difference in power isn't noticeable, but some people have reported power decreases on the dyno. Of course, on the dyno you're not getting the same airflow as driving around.

With the cover off, the engine does sound pretty cool. The whistle of the turbo and the wooshes from the blow-off valve are quite a bit louder. I never felt a performance difference, and if you like the noises, it might be worth it
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 11:12 AM
  #4  
JRGHHRSS08's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-17-2010
Posts: 161
From: Stow, Ohio
Originally Posted by Programmer
I've tried driving without the airbox cover, and have also discussed it with Vince from Trifecta tuning. He has an HHR SS, and has done this to his own car.

It does raise the intake air temperature, because it's no longer pulling cold air from outside the engine bay. Vince told me that the difference in power isn't noticeable, but some people have reported power decreases on the dyno. Of course, on the dyno you're not getting the same airflow as driving around.

With the cover off, the engine does sound pretty cool. The whistle of the turbo and the wooshes from the blow-off valve are quite a bit louder. I never felt a performance difference, and if you like the noises, it might be worth it
Thankyou for the help i will be taking it off tonight.
Old Mar 19, 2010 | 11:12 PM
  #5  
crazysteve's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-24-2007
Posts: 347
From: Springfield MO
we have a dyno at the shop i work for and tried the same I lost 12ft/lb and 9hp with the cover off although it does sound bad ass off.
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 09:57 AM
  #6  
asanti's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-15-2009
Posts: 2,070
From: Waterbury CT
Loss in HP/TQ versus the SS sounding "cool"?..... SOOO not worth it IMO. I'll keep the extra HP/TQ and the semi-sleeper (SS) aspect thanks!

Later
Allex
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 12:18 AM
  #7  
IgottaWoody's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-13-2008
Posts: 4,708
From: Washington State, where it rains
Remember this was done on a dyno where there is no airflow going over the car...this will greatly affect underhood tempts even if they do put a fan in front of the car...that fan cannot duplicate the airflow over the ENTIRE car at 60 mph! While moving there is a vacuum under the car that helps pull air thru the eng compt...that doesn't necessarily mean HOT air is being drawn in......I'm not saying it doesn't, buts really something to think about (or experiment with)...IMO its too loud anyways for underhood noises..at first start up it sounds awful until the eng stabilizes. But, that could just be harmonics from the open air box in relation to the hood, if it were open 360 it would sound different..........




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 PM.