2.0L Performance Tech 260hp (235hp auto) Turbocharged SS tuner version. 260 lb-ft of torque

Dyno results

Old Apr 26, 2009 | 03:39 PM
  #11  
HHR 'Black Death''s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-29-2008
Posts: 166
From: Omaha, NE
Originally Posted by 09 Panel
I don't understand what you mean, sorry?

12.8 to 13.2 is still lean on a turbo engine, I'd be interested in knowing what it is on a stock SS.
Direct Injection is the reason for the lean out... Read into direct injection tech to see. I thought the same thing as i am working on a turbo project for my Jeep. then I read up on the difference direct injection makes and I had the old light bulb pop on. There is actually a slight cooling of intake air because of mixing in cylinder, and the mix is better. Allows for a leaner ratio for efficency.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 06:34 PM
  #12  
Rainman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-18-2008
Posts: 744
From: Oak Harbor, Washington
I'm having mine dyno tomorrow, it's bone stock so I want to dyno after each mod.
Will post my result tomorrow
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #13  
bartSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 06-20-2008
Posts: 1,682
From: Chi-Towns burbs
So does that mean that my 13.1 is good?
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #14  
IgottaWoody's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-13-2008
Posts: 4,708
From: Washington State, where it rains
If 14,7 is normal..then 13.1 is richer while anything above 14,7 would be considered lean......
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 11:07 PM
  #15  
HHR 'Black Death''s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-29-2008
Posts: 166
From: Omaha, NE
Yeah sorry to put my info with actual numbers. I didn't mean the numbers were correct for the situation, just that the motors can run leaner to save fuel because of the DI.
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 03:49 PM
  #16  
camaro98z28's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-23-2008
Posts: 1,148
From: Peoria, AZ
Bart can we see the Dyno sheet?
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 04:58 PM
  #17  
WaGoN MOnger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-05-2008
Posts: 128
From: tampa
Originally Posted by IgottaWoody
If 14,7 is normal..then 13.1 is richer while anything above 14,7 would be considered lean......
forced induction is different, it should be richer at wot, at cruising speed it should be 14.7 which is perfectly stoich anything higher is lean
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #18  
a76marine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-19-2008
Posts: 1,658
From: Chicago, IL (Waukegan)
Originally Posted by camaro98z28
Bart can we see the Dyno sheet?
Guys didn't have a printer at the mobile Dyno so I will be picking this up for Bart this week or on the weekend.
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 06:10 PM
  #19  
bartSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 06-20-2008
Posts: 1,682
From: Chi-Towns burbs
Originally Posted by a76marine
Guys didn't have a printer at the mobile Dyno so I will be picking this up for Bart this week or on the weekend.
Once again thanks for picking that up for me (when you do)
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 07:43 PM
  #20  
Rainman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-18-2008
Posts: 744
From: Oak Harbor, Washington
Dyno stock no Mods

Had dyno today stock no Mods
Max power = 244.67
Max torque = 250.04
Should be about 286.26 at the flywheel, it's a little lein
Having a problem attaching Dyno sheets, will post to my gallery tonight or tomorrow.
Next Mod Stage 1 in a couple weeks then back to the Dyno
Let me know if this is good, bad or the norm for stock

Byron

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.