2.0L Performance Tech 260hp (235hp auto) Turbocharged SS tuner version. 260 lb-ft of torque

Plug and Play GMTU!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 11:41 AM
  #1  
Victory Red SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 192
From: Northern Virginia
Plug and Play GMTU!

I was just on Crate Engine Depot's site looking around and noticed this:

http://www.crateenginedepot.com/stor...P9409C439.aspx

Finally!!!

Now what about those of us have bastardized harnesses???
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 11:48 AM
  #2  
HillsdaleHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-2006
Posts: 21,640
From: Hillsdale, Michigan
Well aint that a b*tch!
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 12:07 PM
  #3  
Maven's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 11-16-2008
Posts: 68
From: NJ
Over $100 because people don't know how to properly crimp or. solder. LMFAO. I've done over 20 upgrades. Never had a wiring issue.
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
HillsdaleHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-2006
Posts: 21,640
From: Hillsdale, Michigan
Knocks on wood as mine has been fine. I would still rather have had the plug and play though.
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 12:13 PM
  #5  
Miltown SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-22-2010
Posts: 387
From: Wisconsin
This should have come standard with the upgrade kit...Come On GM!(puts palm to face)
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 12:15 PM
  #6  
rallycobalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-04-2010
Posts: 724
From: Delaware
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 01:22 PM
  #7  
Maven's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 11-16-2008
Posts: 68
From: NJ
Why should this have been standard? So there is an extra connector to fail to develop corrosion in? So there are more terminals to wear out? So there is yet another mode of failure for the circuit? A properly crimped or soldered joint will have less resistance than a jumper harness will. And as far as I know that isn't a GM harness....I think its something CED developed and had made, so while its possible its made carefully by a wiring pro, its just as likely that its substandard far east crap.
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 02:12 PM
  #8  
bartSS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-20-2008
Posts: 1,682
From: Chi-Towns burbs
Originally Posted by Maven
Why should this have been standard? So there is an extra connector to fail to develop corrosion in? So there are more terminals to wear out? So there is yet another mode of failure for the circuit? A properly crimped or soldered joint will have less resistance than a jumper harness will. And as far as I know that isn't a GM harness....I think its something CED developed and had made, so while its possible its made carefully by a wiring pro, its just as likely that its substandard far east crap.
The man has spoken... Thanks bud
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 05:58 PM
  #9  
black99lightning's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-23-2011
Posts: 18
From: Louisiana
It's a great idea. I would've paid the extra money. Cutting up a wiring harness to install an upgrade?
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 06:05 PM
  #10  
SS fan's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-09-2010
Posts: 14,420
From: Tacoma
I'm not too sure it will stop the bottom one from rubbing that takes a different fix. What the Goodwrench boy's did is still working on mine I was under there yesterday and the wiring still looking pristine ..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.