2.2L Performance Tech 16 valve 143 hp EcoTec with 150 lb-ft of torque

My New Exhaust

Old Feb 5, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #21  
captain howdy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 9,121
From: Rochester,N.Y.
Originally Posted by adamlowery
I swear it doesn't. It does sound bad when I just rev it up though. When I'm actually driving it sounds WAY better. Not sure what changes, but it does. I'm gonna try and get a better soundclip whenever i get a chance. And wheelsee it cost me 100 for the flowmaster and installation and 40 for the tip.
I'm sure it probably does sound better in person. :) I would love to hear a better sound clip when you get the chance.
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #22  
wheelsee's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-24-2005
Posts: 442
From: BalCo, MD
adam,

do u have a part number I can't find anything for the HHR on Flowmaster's site...

-wC
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #23  
captain howdy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 9,121
From: Rochester,N.Y.
All he did was replace the muffler people. Go to any muffler shop and they can put one on. It's not a kit nor is it vehicle specific.
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 09:07 PM
  #24  
adamlowery's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-11-2005
Posts: 829
From: McLoud, Oklahoma
All I did was replace the muffler and add a tip as howdy said. Not sure what the part # was. It cost me 140 total. (40 of it was the tip)
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 09:11 PM
  #25  
txsman2930's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-20-2006
Posts: 1,230
From: Dallas, TX
Do you get any additional HP with the new muffler?
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 09:52 AM
  #26  
adamlowery's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-11-2005
Posts: 829
From: McLoud, Oklahoma
I don't think I'd really get any extra hp unless the stock muffler was really restrictive. I drove it really heavy before they put it on and did the same afterwards and I couldn't tell a difference. But I really didn't do it for a hp boost. Thats what a cat back system is for.
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 10:58 AM
  #27  
snksknr94's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-29-2005
Posts: 369
From: Arizona
Glad you're happy with it. I personally won't run a flowmater on anything, they are one of the worst flowing mufflers out there and I've seen several rust through here in AZ, so I can only imagine what it would be like in a place where it actually rains. But if you're happy with it, guess thats all that matters.
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 11:50 AM
  #28  
SoCalHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 5,359
From: SoCal
I put flowmasters on a 350 Chevy El Camino and took them off the next week.
At the time I was managing a speed shop. Worst performance I ever had with that engine.

If you're happy - that's all that matters though.
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #29  
snksknr94's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-29-2005
Posts: 369
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by SoCalHHR
I put flowmasters on a 350 Chevy El Camino and took them off the next week.
At the time I was managing a speed shop. Worst performance I ever had with that engine.

If you're happy - that's all that matters though.
I saw a dyno chart for several differnt cars where they put a flowmater on then a differnt cat back set-up in every test the flowmaster was the worst, plus I personally hate the sound.
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 02:02 PM
  #30  
adamlowery's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-11-2005
Posts: 829
From: McLoud, Oklahoma
Originally Posted by SoCalHHR
If you're happy - that's all that matters though.
Too True!!! I'm very happy.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 PM.