2.4L Performance Tech 16 valve 172 hp EcoTec with 162 lb-ft of torque

Alcohol Level

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2015 | 12:40 PM
  #11  
donbrew's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: 01-23-2009
Posts: 26,532
From: Fredericksburg,VA
A few points:
on my car anyway, closed loop is attained within 2 minutes (usually much less).

So, if I have never used E85 at all, my ECM should be cool?

I have found wide variation of reported % using OBDII readers. Most of the time the pumps around here have a label that says "Contains 10% Ethanol", but usually the OBDII reports 0% sometimes up to 10%.

Where I can actually tell what is going on is the PID that measures the cat efficiency. When the level is at 10% the PID value is supposed to be above .05, when below 10% it's supposed to be above .035. I may have got those bassackward.

I generally fill up with more than 13 gallons, usually 2-4 times a week.

And the ethanol is added to the delivery truck at the tank farm by the driver; if you know any truck drivers you know why I'm skeptical.
Old Mar 8, 2015 | 01:05 PM
  #12  
2005HHRauto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-26-2009
Posts: 669
From: City of Champions
Originally Posted by firemangeorge
Nice info above but what year(s) and model(s) does it pertain to ?
2009, 2010 2011 HHR, + all models except the SS...
The 2009 HHR was the 1st 4 banger, for GM, to to be flex fuel capable…

Starting in 2012, GM went back to using a sensor, to calculate Ethanol percentage...

Last edited by 2005HHRauto; Mar 8, 2015 at 03:45 PM.
Old Mar 8, 2015 | 01:10 PM
  #13  
2005HHRauto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-26-2009
Posts: 669
From: City of Champions
Originally Posted by donbrew
A few points:
on my car anyway, closed loop is attained within 2 minutes (usually much less).

So, if I have never used E85 at all, my ECM should be cool?

I have found wide variation of reported % using OBDII readers. Most of the time the pumps around here have a label that says "Contains 10% Ethanol", but usually the OBDII reports 0% sometimes up to 10%.

Where I can actually tell what is going on is the PID that measures the cat efficiency. When the level is at 10% the PID value is supposed to be above .05, when below 10% it's supposed to be above .035. I may have got those bassackward.

I generally fill up with more than 13 gallons, usually 2-4 times a week.

And the ethanol is added to the delivery truck at the tank farm by the driver; if you know any truck drivers you know why I'm skeptical.
Yes, your ECM is a-ok… If you got a 'batch' that was more than E0-E10, than your ECM would adjust for it, BUT, it would be such a small adjustment., & it would be doing, what it is support to be doing. Than as you fill-up again, & again, it will adjust back to really close to normal, E0-E10. So no problems, at all, really...

Last edited by 2005HHRauto; Mar 8, 2015 at 03:41 PM.
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 08:18 AM
  #14  
Dloch's Avatar
 
Joined: 09-23-2005
Posts: 4
From: Michigan
2005HHRauto I'm making an assumption here based on your explanation that GM is/was using narrow band O2 sensors on those cars. By monitoring the O2 swing and the STFT & LTFT's over time the ECM would determine what level of Ethanol was in the fuel load. Am I correct?
Old Apr 8, 2015 | 04:28 PM
  #15  
donbrew's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: 01-23-2009
Posts: 26,532
From: Fredericksburg,VA
Originally Posted by Dloch
2005HHRauto I'm making an assumption here based on your explanation that GM is/was using narrow band O2 sensors on those cars. By monitoring the O2 swing and the STFT & LTFT's over time the ECM would determine what level of Ethanol was in the fuel load. Am I correct?
Sort of (it's a computer thing). But the SS has a wide band #1 sensor.
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 01:58 PM
  #16  
Blue_SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-07-2011
Posts: 2,180
From: SE Mich
Cool

Originally Posted by donbrew
Sort of (it's a computer thing). But the SS has a wide band #1 sensor.
Oh, really? That makes many simple changes easy... T-Y to donbrew!

-Dave, in the D
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 02:21 PM
  #17  
DrLoch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-07-2008
Posts: 1,016
From: Mebane, NC
Originally Posted by donbrew
Sort of (it's a computer thing). But the SS has a wide band #1 sensor.
Roger that, I'm a code writer as well, adaptive learning, among other things is what we call it. The problem with that as 2005HHRauto indicated you have to let something run long enough to develop the trend. If you do the short hop thing the long term results aren't going to be good.
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 04:23 PM
  #18  
Grizzly old man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-2011
Posts: 737
From: Savanna Illinois
Evidently not the '06. My daughter was using the HHR for a while, while I was working on her Neon. She found gas for a much lower price and put it in. It turned out that the gas was the E85 so mostly alcohol.

She asked me what was wrong with the car because she was getting really bad mileage. One tank was lasting about 2/3rds as long as a tank of the regular 10% gas.

I checked a lot of things out and could not find anything particularly 'wrong' with the car. After talking a bit I discovered she had put the 'cheaper' gas in.

The car ran alright but was a bit doggy when you would try to pass someone. Once she started getting the regular 10% gas everything went back to normal. I figure having the higher amount of alcohol probably just dried and cleaned the fuel system out.

Everything is back to normal and has been for a year or so. The kid learned that paying less for gas isn't always a good thing.
Old Apr 9, 2015 | 04:51 PM
  #19  
donbrew's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: 01-23-2009
Posts: 26,532
From: Fredericksburg,VA
Originally Posted by Grizzly old man
Evidently not the '06. My daughter was using the HHR for a while, while I was working on her Neon. She found gas for a much lower price and put it in. It turned out that the gas was the E85 so mostly alcohol.

She asked me what was wrong with the car because she was getting really bad mileage. One tank was lasting about 2/3rds as long as a tank of the regular 10% gas.

I checked a lot of things out and could not find anything particularly 'wrong' with the car. After talking a bit I discovered she had put the 'cheaper' gas in.

The car ran alright but was a bit doggy when you would try to pass someone. Once she started getting the regular 10% gas everything went back to normal. I figure having the higher amount of alcohol probably just dried and cleaned the fuel system out.

Everything is back to normal and has been for a year or so. The kid learned that paying less for gas isn't always a good thing.
If the car is not labelled "FLEX FUEL" It does not have the sensing system.
Old Apr 15, 2015 | 03:18 PM
  #20  
donbrew's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: 01-23-2009
Posts: 26,532
From: Fredericksburg,VA
New question.

I refilled yesterday with 12.6 gallons. This morning the alcohol was measured at 4.6%. After driving 150 miles the alcohol is showing 0.8%.

The reason I'm monitoring is I'm still fighting P0420 and the target number changes with alcohol percentage. (Oxygenated fuel reads differently to O2sensors).

I had the same results with a different ECU, 3 different cats and 6 different sensors. No exhaust leaks. No vac leaks. New injectors fixed it for 2 months.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.