2.4L Performance Tech 16 valve 172 hp EcoTec with 162 lb-ft of torque

CGS vs. Airaid Test: Part 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2006 | 08:55 AM
  #31  
hvrod's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-21-2005
Posts: 1,010
From: Launch Coast Calif.
A heat shield is being developed..
good good ... another design change...

What will that bring the final talley of price for the whole unit ?
Old May 28, 2006 | 09:47 AM
  #32  
dan-d's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-12-2006
Posts: 847
From: Space Coast, FL
Originally Posted by ng8650
Dan don't take this the wrong way, but after two sentences my eyes hurt so bad I couldn't read anymore...

Ng
Yeah, kinda gave me a headache too...
Old May 28, 2006 | 11:38 AM
  #33  
HHR PNOY's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-2006
Posts: 855
From: Los Angeles, CA
cj,

do you have a online reseller for your filter? I like how it looks.
Old May 28, 2006 | 03:12 PM
  #34  
cj krause's Avatar
Deceased
 
Joined: 10-03-2005
Posts: 2,351
From: Sachse, TX NE Dallas
Originally Posted by HHR PNOY
cj,

do you have a online reseller for your filter? I like how it looks.
it was a 3R racing
bought it at a OReilys and they werent carrying it anymore
had a lifetime warranty label on it like K&N so who knows
Old May 28, 2006 | 04:36 PM
  #35  
Clarke33's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-20-2006
Posts: 215
From: Huntsville, AL
Mike, let me stir the pot just a little bit. On 2-14-06 you posted your 0-60 time of 7.63 seconds and 1/4 mile time of 15.86. On you review of both new intakes the 0-60 times are 8.90 with the Airaid and 8.57 with the CGS. Why is it a second to nearly a second and a half slower now?
Old May 28, 2006 | 04:39 PM
  #36  
hvrod's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-21-2005
Posts: 1,010
From: Launch Coast Calif.
Originally Posted by Clarke33
Mike, let me stir the pot just a little bit. On 2-14-06 you posted your 0-60 time of 7.63 seconds and 1/4 mile time of 15.86. On you review of both new intakes the 0-60 times are 8.90 with the Airaid and 8.57 with the CGS. Why is it a second to nearly a second and a half slower now?

Wow good catch...
Old May 28, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #37  
SoCalHHR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 5,359
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Clarke33
Mike, let me stir the pot just a little bit. On 2-14-06 you posted your 0-60 time of 7.63 seconds and 1/4 mile time of 15.86. On you review of both new intakes the 0-60 times are 8.90 with the Airaid and 8.57 with the CGS. Why is it a second to nearly a second and a half slower now?
It's simple really - that "fast" time was with my stock 16" tires/wheels which are both lighter and narrower (less rolling resistance). The 0-60 times I just posted were with my new 17" wheels - which are both heavier and wider than a stock HHR's 17" wheels.

For our dyno testing this week, the stock wheel/tire combination will be put back on to get the most realistic figures possible. (*these are the tires/wheels the car was sold with.)

Hope it helps,
Old May 29, 2006 | 11:22 AM
  #38  
hvrod's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-21-2005
Posts: 1,010
From: Launch Coast Calif.
what will become of us ???........

Last edited by hvrod; May 29, 2006 at 11:58 AM.
Old May 29, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #39  
booksmitty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-20-2006
Posts: 520
From: Sacramento, CA
Cool

Originally Posted by hvrod
One sided again....
Are we being testy??
Old May 29, 2006 | 11:46 AM
  #40  
captain howdy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 9,121
From: Rochester,N.Y.
Rims aren't going to make a second and a half difference though.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.