new & old dyno results
#1
new & old dyno results
new & old dyno results
One has only todays nitrous run, the other has all four; today's with and w/o, and my first results with and w/o.
I was surprised that there was so little difference in the base. I had switched from CGS to GMPP and also switched to iridium plugs. I did pick up a couple HP on the low end, but that could have just been the weather.
Nice gains from going to a 75 shot though.
If you have technical questions about these, you're going to have to ask someone else. I just read the large print, see the flow of the lines, and listen to what I'm told. I have no skills in anylizing this steff!
Here's the original two by themselves.
One has only todays nitrous run, the other has all four; today's with and w/o, and my first results with and w/o.
I was surprised that there was so little difference in the base. I had switched from CGS to GMPP and also switched to iridium plugs. I did pick up a couple HP on the low end, but that could have just been the weather.
Nice gains from going to a 75 shot though.
If you have technical questions about these, you're going to have to ask someone else. I just read the large print, see the flow of the lines, and listen to what I'm told. I have no skills in anylizing this steff!
Here's the original two by themselves.
#2
You said there was no real difference between the CGS and the GMPP? I just spoke with CGS today regarding the code (they were unaware of the problem for non SS cars). They are posting dyno results in the next couple of days regarding CGS vs stock intake. But they claim 11-12 HP gain. They had the same feelings I did about the GMPP/Airraid/K&N box type (box on top of engine heats air, no direct flow into cleaner, small inlet of tube by hole in fenderwell, and the bends would impede air flow). They also said that if the air is hot due to not circulating when the vehicle is stopped, who cares? You do not need the HP at a traffic light. Once moving, you have the cooler air flowing both into the hole in the fenderwell as well as around the engine. The CGS filter will suck in air all around it, not just via a small hole aimed at the fenderwell.
That said, your nitrous idea looks great. Most of the time driving, you do not need the extra HP so forced air is not utilized anyway. Here in NYC, I rarely ever floor it.
That said, your nitrous idea looks great. Most of the time driving, you do not need the extra HP so forced air is not utilized anyway. Here in NYC, I rarely ever floor it.
#3
Lee.....
You are mistaken about the air intake in the fenderwell. The hole that you see when looking into the fenderwell is for access to a motor mount bolt.
The air for the intake is captured from under the car and in front of the radiator. It travels between sheet metal components and enters through, what you believe is the intake hole UNDER THE HOOD, then through the hose/tubing.
That's why JoeR and others indicate the OEM is ALREADY A COLD AIR INTAKE.
Could it be better......you bet.
You are mistaken about the air intake in the fenderwell. The hole that you see when looking into the fenderwell is for access to a motor mount bolt.
The air for the intake is captured from under the car and in front of the radiator. It travels between sheet metal components and enters through, what you believe is the intake hole UNDER THE HOOD, then through the hose/tubing.
That's why JoeR and others indicate the OEM is ALREADY A COLD AIR INTAKE.
Could it be better......you bet.
#5
How can you switch to iridum spark plugs if it already comes from factory with iridum tip plugs?
Info from Lone Ranger:
2006 model yr
2.2L AC 41-105, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2007 model yr
2.2L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2008 model yr
2.0L turbo engine |no spark plug data|
2.2L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
Info from Lone Ranger:
2006 model yr
2.2L AC 41-105, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2007 model yr
2.2L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2008 model yr
2.0L turbo engine |no spark plug data|
2.2L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
#6
How can you switch to iridum spark plugs if it already comes from factory with iridum tip plugs?
Info from Lone Ranger:
2006 model yr
2.2L AC 41-105, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2007 model yr
2.2L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2008 model yr
2.0L turbo engine |no spark plug data|
2.2L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
Info from Lone Ranger:
2006 model yr
2.2L AC 41-105, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2007 model yr
2.2L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2008 model yr
2.0L turbo engine |no spark plug data|
2.2L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
2.4L AC 41-103, iridium tip plug
#7
You said there was no real difference between the CGS and the GMPP? I just spoke with CGS today regarding the code (they were unaware of the problem for non SS cars). They are posting dyno results in the next couple of days regarding CGS vs stock intake. But they claim 11-12 HP gain. They had the same feelings I did about the GMPP/Airraid/K&N box type (box on top of engine heats air, no direct flow into cleaner, small inlet of tube by hole in fenderwell, and the bends would impede air flow). They also said that if the air is hot due to not circulating when the vehicle is stopped, who cares? You do not need the HP at a traffic light. Once moving, you have the cooler air flowing both into the hole in the fenderwell as well as around the engine. The CGS filter will suck in air all around it, not just via a small hole aimed at the fenderwell.
That said, your nitrous idea looks great. Most of the time driving, you do not need the extra HP so forced air is not utilized anyway. Here in NYC, I rarely ever floor it.
That said, your nitrous idea looks great. Most of the time driving, you do not need the extra HP so forced air is not utilized anyway. Here in NYC, I rarely ever floor it.
IMO, any intake will not perform to its potential on a dyno. The idea is for them to work best while moving, so any discussion about that is pretty meaningless. Especially when they are not done under the same exact conditions.
#8
Lee.....
You are mistaken about the air intake in the fenderwell. The hole that you see when looking into the fenderwell is for access to a motor mount bolt.
The air for the intake is captured from under the car and in front of the radiator. It travels between sheet metal components and enters through, what you believe is the intake hole UNDER THE HOOD, then through the hose/tubing.
That's why JoeR and others indicate the OEM is ALREADY A COLD AIR INTAKE.
Could it be better......you bet.
You are mistaken about the air intake in the fenderwell. The hole that you see when looking into the fenderwell is for access to a motor mount bolt.
The air for the intake is captured from under the car and in front of the radiator. It travels between sheet metal components and enters through, what you believe is the intake hole UNDER THE HOOD, then through the hose/tubing.
That's why JoeR and others indicate the OEM is ALREADY A COLD AIR INTAKE.
Could it be better......you bet.
If you want a true cold air package like they did for racing, get a box with dry ice. Other than that, I think the most efficient way to do it would be a hoodscoop. Anything with hoses and tubes will have problems due to restrictions from the bends.
Lets get real here, though. We are not talking about a race car or even a high performance sports car meant for cruising at breakneck speeds. Please, nobody get mad at me, but the HHR is really just a nice, functional economy car meant to transport people and cargo from place to place. Remember, it is just a fancy body on the Cobalt which is marketed as an econocar.
#9
Lets get real here, though. We are not talking about a race car or even a high performance sports car meant for cruising at breakneck speeds. Please, nobody get mad at me, but the HHR is really just a nice, functional economy car meant to transport people and cargo from place to place. Remember, it is just a fancy body on the Cobalt which is marketed as an econocar.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dsmisfits
2.2L Performance Tech
17
10-06-2010 12:42 AM