2.4L Performance Tech 16 valve 172 hp EcoTec with 162 lb-ft of torque

Why did GM lower the horsepower ratings?

Old Nov 28, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #1  
mynameistaken's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 11-24-2007
Posts: 54
From: Location Location
Why did GM lower the horsepower ratings?

2007 2.4 175 hp and 165 lb-ft of torque
2008 2.4 172 hp and 162 lb-ft of torque

Its only 3 hp but what did they change?
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #2  
jx3's Avatar
jx3
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-19-2005
Posts: 20,687
From: Miami
Originally Posted by mynameistaken
2007 2.4 175 hp and 165 lb-ft of torque
2008 2.4 172 hp and 162 lb-ft of torque

Its only 3 hp but what did they change?
Maybe conditions at time of each testing, such as temperature, were a bit different.
Or maybe they just had a bunch of super squirrels to put in the 07s.
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 05:31 PM
  #3  
calgaryhhr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-21-2006
Posts: 939
From: Calgary
Aren't the 2008 numbers the same as the 2006 numbers??

I think 2007 was just an anamolous year.
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 06:12 PM
  #4  
JoeR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-02-2005
Posts: 1,245
From: VA
The newer GM ratings are SAE Certified, same procedures, but need to have a SAE certified technician there. No changes in the engine, so the difference is well within the norm....

IOW, no big deal ---------- No changes.
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 07:23 PM
  #5  
photojoed80's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-26-2007
Posts: 130
From: Schaumburg, IL
'07's are SAE certified too. I have read that the difference for '07 had something to do with the catalyst. If I can find the article, I'll post it.
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 01:42 AM
  #6  
Dan's HHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-24-2007
Posts: 947
From: Quebec city,Canada
to all 07 owners we're the meanest HHR

Last edited by Dan's HHR; Nov 29, 2007 at 11:28 PM.
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 06:42 AM
  #7  
solman98's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-2006
Posts: 6,053
From: Dallas, GA
Originally Posted by photojoed80
'07's are SAE certified too. I have read that the difference for '07 had something to do with the catalyst. If I can find the article, I'll post it.
The certifications for all 2008 models are much tighter than the 2007. That is why the EPA numbers changed as well.
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 07:01 AM
  #8  
mynameistaken's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 11-24-2007
Posts: 54
From: Location Location
Yeah, I was thinking they tightened up emissions or fuel economy a bit.
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #9  
Don Battista's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-2006
Posts: 238
From: Bradenton Fl./Murphy NC.
I have an 06 2.4, Same HP as the 08.
I remember reading some were that the 06 & 07 2.4 are the same Engines and were advertised wrong in regards to Horse power.
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 05:20 PM
  #10  
an08HHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-2007
Posts: 1,441
From: xxxxx-xx
I noticed that also in the brochure and thought maybe they changed the compression ratio a little since it can use 87 octane (91 recommended but not required) and this helps along with the VVT to eliminate and chance of knocking.

Last edited by an08HHR; Nov 29, 2007 at 09:26 PM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.