General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

2.2 / 2.4 valve cover

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2012 | 09:27 PM
  #1  
skyline26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 08-09-2012
Posts: 1,979
From: Cambridge, Ontario , Canada
2.2 / 2.4 valve cover

i came accross a post about this before but now I cant seem to find it...is there any difference between the valve covers for the 2.2 and 2.4...are they exact fit? any gains if go 2.4? If i remember correctly on the 2.4 there are 2 holes on the side for some kind of hookup that the 2.2 doesnt have..is this true?
Old Oct 16, 2012 | 07:24 AM
  #2  
kwe45919's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-2012
Posts: 265
From: Oak Ridge, TN
You won't get any preformance gains from swapping valve covers. Yes they should be a direct fit. As as far as the 2 holes....not sure about that but they may just be for vaccum lines.
Old Oct 16, 2012 | 10:31 AM
  #3  
skyline26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 08-09-2012
Posts: 1,979
From: Cambridge, Ontario , Canada
umm so which is it? lol
Old Oct 16, 2012 | 10:49 AM
  #4  
HipHotRod's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-04-2008
Posts: 2,366
From: Long Beach, Ca

2.4


2.2
Old Oct 16, 2012 | 10:56 AM
  #5  
solman98's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-2006
Posts: 6,053
From: Dallas, GA
Looking at those pics, I'd say it's not a direct fit. The mounting points at the cam sprockets are definatly different. The 2.4 even has one in the center.

Is the one for the 2.2 the non VVT varieth?
Old Oct 16, 2012 | 05:18 PM
  #6  
skyline26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Premium Member
 
Joined: 08-09-2012
Posts: 1,979
From: Cambridge, Ontario , Canada
does the 2.2 have any writing on it ? i like how it says ecotec vvt
Old Oct 16, 2012 | 09:40 PM
  #7  
wmsburghhr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-2011
Posts: 130
From: va
Originally Posted by skyline26
does the 2.2 have any writing on it ? i like how it says ecotec vvt
I believe the 2006 2.2 did not have vvt . Seems like it was in 07 that it went to the vvt where as the 2.4 was always had vvt. I know it read it someplace on the forum.
Old Oct 17, 2012 | 01:56 AM
  #8  
prod's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-14-2007
Posts: 2,964
From: Toronto ON Canada
Originally Posted by wmsburghhr
I believe the 2006 2.2 did not have vvt . Seems like it was in 07 that it went to the vvt where as the 2.4 was always had vvt. I know it read it someplace on the forum.
The 2.2 added vvt in 2009+, with flexfuel capability.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RatFink1986
General HHR
5
Aug 1, 2014 11:31 AM
suburbanjunior
South Pacific
14
Jan 5, 2009 08:03 PM
Bertland
Picture & Media
10
Jun 16, 2007 11:45 AM
Lee3333
Appearance/Modifications Discussions
8
Sep 13, 2006 09:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.