General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

Schizoid DIC mileage readings versus reality

Old Jul 20, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #11  
Old Lar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-11-2007
Posts: 1,379
From: Palm Bay, Florida
My DIC always has read less than my calculated numbers by 2-4 mpg.
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 07:15 AM
  #12  
urbexHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-16-2009
Posts: 6,038
From: Frankenmuth/Flint, MI
The one time I compared it, my DIC was much higher than what I got. I think it said about 30, and I got 27 or so. I just always use my DIC. It's easier.

(God, I have a dirty mind.....)
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #13  
Old Lar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-11-2007
Posts: 1,379
From: Palm Bay, Florida
I completed a 3400 mile road trip and my DIC was continually off. DIC 30.6, calculated 32.6,the last fill DIC 26.6, calculated 30.2. Does anyone know how DIC calculated mpg?
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #14  
Nor-Cal HHR Club's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-09-2006
Posts: 930
From: Fresno, California (formerly of Modesto, Ca. -- hometown of George Lucas, formerly of Winnipeg, Mb.)
My dear wife takes the DIC as the gospel truth for mileage... and that gets my dander up. I try and tell her that what the DIC tells you, it only an estimate, and not actuall mileage!
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 02:45 PM
  #15  
Darkangel's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-14-2009
Posts: 47
From: Oshawa ON
As far as I know it is not an estimate but an average of all your driving. Set it to mileage and watch it change as you accelerate and brake, coast or climb a hill. It would not be what every liter or gallon used in your vehicle gets but an average of what they all get. As it is lower when you coast and higher when you accelerate the end number can not be what you actually got. Makes perfect sense to me. Same as the avg speed display.
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 03:00 PM
  #16  
hyperv6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-05-2008
Posts: 5,464
From: Akron Ohio
I may be wrong but I think it works this way.

The engine has many sensors on it that take most of it's functions into account. MPH, RPM, Throttle Position, Gallons in the tank etc.

What it does is read all these items and gives you a estimate of the gas used.

Note though the fuel gage has a limit to read the full gallons and if you top off the tank you can get more fuel in it than the car will read. This can be seen when your fuel range does not move for a while after a fill up. This would account for extra fuel and for why some people see 1-2 more MPG than the DIC.

In short the only way to accuratly measure fuel use it to use a measued amount of fuel and drive it. Even if you so your own numbers who is to say you have put the exact same amount in the tank this time as you put in last time?

Most tanks can take one to two more gallons just in the filler nect alone. My Fiero can take about 2 because of the lenght of it and it is non measured gas.

You could also incorperate a flow meter to measure it that way but that is a bit over kill.
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 04:34 PM
  #17  
GotOne's Avatar
 
Joined: 07-09-2009
Posts: 4
From: NE Ohio
Since getting my 09 ls the first of July I have put 2989 miles on the car. I have created a spreadsheet that I enter all of my mileage into and the DIC and Hand calculated fuel economy balance out in the end. -- 32.13mpg --

I have had a variance ranginging from .04 all the way to 2.37mpg.
I estimate gallons used from the miles driven / DIC Economy to the actual gallons used. Over the long run it (as of today) I have a estimated variance of .02 gallons and .11mpg.

The most interesting that I had happen during this time is filling the tank with 16.7 gallons. Concidering that the car only has a 16.3 gallon tank it looks like I ran on vapors for a few miles. I actually think that I had another 20 miles that I could put on the odo before I ran out of vapor.

Kurt
09 LS
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 05:27 PM
  #18  
09_SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-19-2009
Posts: 385
From: Green Bay
Originally Posted by Darkangel
As far as I know it is not an estimate but an average of all your driving. Set it to mileage and watch it change as you accelerate and brake, coast or climb a hill. It would not be what every liter or gallon used in your vehicle gets but an average of what they all get. As it is lower when you coast and higher when you accelerate the end number can not be what you actually got. Makes perfect sense to me. Same as the avg speed display.
Your talking about the Instant MPG avg, so yes you are correct. But the OP was talking about the other MPG reading.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
donbrew
Problems/Service/Repairs
5
Aug 30, 2014 05:36 PM
donbrew
General HHR
6
Jun 7, 2014 05:35 PM
OVRBOOST
2.0L Performance Tech
12
Apr 1, 2011 01:20 PM
HillsdaleHHR
General HHR
4
Jul 11, 2009 11:42 AM
crowbar
Appearance/Modifications Discussions
36
Mar 6, 2007 09:24 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.