General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

upset

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 01:42 PM
  #41  
captain howdy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 9,121
From: Rochester,N.Y.
Screw fuel efficient. It's way overrated and some of us don't get the 30 MPG that others claim anyways.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 01:48 PM
  #42  
O6ChevyHHR's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: 11-18-2005
Posts: 3,307
From: Naples, FL
yep i know, i want to put 300 Hp in mine! Maybe chey will consider what dodge is doing.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 02:01 PM
  #43  
jx3's Avatar
jx3
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-19-2005
Posts: 20,687
From: Miami
I'm in the same boat you're in Capt. I can't get anywhere close to 30 mpg either. But I have to agree w/ GM about being cautious on a new release following the SSR disaster.


Originally Posted by captain howdy
Now days the aftermarket comes at the same time if it's going to have aftermarket support. The Mustang and Magnum are good examples of this. Look at the new Mustang. Everything was out for that car at launch, body kits, turbos, superchargers, suspension, you name it and it was already there. Ford made sure to provide it's top aftermarket companies CAD drawings and whatever they needed to produce parts. I am starting to think there isn't going to be much aftermarket support for our vehicle. Let's face it, it's a good looking little ecobox with a tiny engine and crappy FWD. Thank god I have my Malibu so I actually have a powerful car. The HHR has been on the market for almost a year now and we don't even have a CAI for our vehicle.


Ever since '65 there has been a DEMAND for the Mustang. When Ford threatened to discontinue the Stang for the Probe, Ford never heard the end of it till it promised NOT to discontinue the Stang. As far as Chrylser goes, they brought the HEMI back several years ago, and the SRT team has been around for years. So whether I wanted to make a street racer or not, I knew that the performance parts would take a while.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #44  
SoCalHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 5,359
From: SoCal
I just got off the phone with AEM again. Tring to get this thing nailed down.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #45  
wheelsee's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-24-2005
Posts: 442
From: BalCo, MD
Originally Posted by SoCalHHR
I just got off the phone with AEM again. Tring to get this thing nailed down.

lay the SoCal Hammer down...

-wC
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #46  
RickyO's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-03-2006
Posts: 45
From: Southeast
Originally Posted by SoCalHHR
Just checked my DMV stats on the Ranger: 3500lbs (it was a 4x2 short bed)
My HHR weighs in at 3155lbs, so yes - you are right; the HHR is lighter.

Oh, and I just went back and changed my original post
The Ranger's V6 only had 145hp!

That makes the HHR's 172hp 4cyl look pretty good!

Still...I'd love to have the 210hp my wife's Accord 4cyl has!
Yea, I checked out the ford site after I ran off at the mouth, but couldn't find any weights for the ranger. Actually 3500 is light for a truck. I am really impressed with the weight on the H though. Time to hit the road and add another 400 miles to it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
halfpanel08
General HHR
23
Jun 30, 2009 09:27 AM
Leon
General HHR
1
May 29, 2008 05:20 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 PM.