General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

Would you like to help GM? Here's how!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 09:41 AM
  #51  
ChevyMgr's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Joined: 11-23-2007
Posts: 8,210
From: Texas
GM only builds the body, engine and transmission. Everything else is supplied by vendors. If the vendors build crap parts then GMs fault here is for using bad vendors. A lot of the components are made all over the world and then supplied to the vendors who then create a component to be installed. Some of the countries I see stamped on parts are Mexico, China, Malaysia, Canada, Bulgaria, Taiwan, Guatamala, Brazil and the list goes on. Seems to be a world wide problem with quality.
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #52  
Cokeybill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-2008
Posts: 1,115
From: Oshawa
Originally Posted by hyperv6
Gee, so If my car was not built in Canada and made in the States I would not had issue with it too?

Hmmmm.....

I think you will find faults are more a problem of how the car is designed and the model vs who is putting on the parts in what country.

For the record my HHR has not had any issues to this point and has been better than many past cars I have owned. I have no issues with build quality.

Now that is not to say I may have an issue with design quality later.
I've had a few faults with my HHR, but I really like it. My prior HHR was issue free and could not have asked for better choice . I was just trying to say that the turnover for the jobs in the Mexican plant is large, as many employees quit and then the process to have to hire and retrain new employees begins again. My understanding from inside sources state that there is frequent job replacements in the plant in Mexico.
As a matter of fact, there is a plant manager in the Oshawa plant that came from Mexico. I suppose he is in the oshawa plant for experience to take to Mexico at some time in the future.
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #53  
Cokeybill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-2008
Posts: 1,115
From: Oshawa
Originally Posted by ChevyMgr
GM only builds the body, engine and transmission. Everything else is supplied by vendors. If the vendors build crap parts then GMs fault here is for using bad vendors. A lot of the components are made all over the world and then supplied to the vendors who then create a component to be installed. Some of the countries I see stamped on parts are Mexico, China, Malaysia, Canada, Bulgaria, Taiwan, Guatamala, Brazil and the list goes on. Seems to be a world wide problem with quality.
Also with Toyota and Honda, although quality reports from these two are only reported through North American sales and not on a world wide scale such as the Big 3 that report quality worldwide. Some things are hidden...some are not!
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #54  
Cokeybill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-2008
Posts: 1,115
From: Oshawa
Originally Posted by ChevyMgr
GM only builds the body, engine and transmission. Everything else is supplied by vendors. If the vendors build crap parts then GMs fault here is for using bad vendors. A lot of the components are made all over the world and then supplied to the vendors who then create a component to be installed. Some of the countries I see stamped on parts are Mexico, China, Malaysia, Canada, Bulgaria, Taiwan, Guatamala, Brazil and the list goes on. Seems to be a world wide problem with quality.
Even ChevyMgr knows the quality numbers that come out of Oshawa. Not many plants can boast about the what is done here.
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 10:39 AM
  #55  
SlickRick2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-2008
Posts: 165
From: South Jersey
Originally Posted by rommer
...Taking from those that have to give to those that don't has never made this great nation grow.
So, I guess you were equally upset when the rich got huge tax breaks and the Middle Class was expected to make up the difference? In other words: Taking from those that don't have to give to those that do...

I'm STILL waiting for it to trickle down from the Reagon era.
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 10:48 AM
  #56  
rommer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-17-2008
Posts: 287
From: NJ
Originally Posted by SlickRick2
So, I guess you were equally upset when the rich got huge tax breaks and the Middle Class was expected to make up the difference? In other words: Taking from those that don't have to give to those that do...

I'm STILL waiting for it to trickle down from the Reagon era.
Does that kool-aid your drinking taste good?

0bamas tax breaks for 95% of the public are really interesting when 44% of those people pay NO taxes. Why would they be entitled to something they haven't even worked for.

Do you really think it is fair that 5% of the people should pay 95% of the taxes? That's not what this great nation is all about. Go to France if you want socialism.
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #57  
ChevyMgr's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Joined: 11-23-2007
Posts: 8,210
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Cokeybill
Even ChevyMgr knows the quality numbers that come out of Oshawa. Not many plants can boast about the what is done here.
You got that right. Those Canadians know their stuff!
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #58  
JimZ_HHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-18-2006
Posts: 839
From: Hillcrest, San Diego, CA
Let the Big Oil companies give them the Loan, No Cars. No Gas to Sell.
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #59  
SlickRick2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-2008
Posts: 165
From: South Jersey
I don't want to turn this into a political thread; although, the whole GM bailout is a political issue more than an economic one. But...

Originally Posted by rommer
0bamas tax breaks for 95% of the public are really interesting when 44% of those people pay NO taxes. Why would they be entitled to something they haven't even worked for.
I don't think you quite have your facts correct; the "44% [who] pay no taxes" are not necessarily people who haven't worked, but people whose income and deductions cause them to receive a refund to the extent that they do not owe taxes. They have worked. Obama is not proposing to hand us money but to lower the tax rate. Thus, for those who actually do not work and do not pay taxes, they get nothing.

Originally Posted by rommer
Do you really think it is fair that 5% of the people should pay 95% of the taxes? That's not what this great nation is all about. Go to France if you want socialism.
Is it fair for, say, Hedge Fund managers who make a billion and pay less taxes than "Joe the Plumber"? As far as Socialism, the proportional income tax has been around a long, long time. The Earned Income Credit, where someone can receive a refund greater than the tax withheld, was started by Ronal Reagan, the poster child for Conservatives.
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #60  
RoadDawg831's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-07-2008
Posts: 237
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by JimZ_HHR
Let the Big Oil companies give them the Loan, No Cars. No Gas to Sell.
Flawless logic!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.