The Lounge Off Topic PG-13.
Warning: The Lounge may contain irrelevant and off topic discussions that may not be related to anything HHR. If you are not interested in these kinds of discussions, do not read or respond to these threads.

2011 Kia Sportage - turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 12:47 PM
  #21  
gmdealerguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-24-2009
Posts: 273
From: NEW YORK
[QUOTE=JeramieJJ;500140]I wouldn't say your getting "more", your just getting the "money applied for build" placed in a different area. QUOTE]


I guess you can look at it that way.......but that works for me.
Again, I am not looking for speed and perf anymore anyway......and the Juke is plenty torquey.......if needed......
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 12:53 PM
  #22  
JeramieJJ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-11-2009
Posts: 327
From: WI
Originally Posted by gmdealerguy
Again, I am not looking for speed and perf anymore anyway......and the Juke is plenty torquey.......if needed......
I like that....you know what is going to be different and are fine with that and looking forward to it. I think that brings it back full circle to the OP, asking for opinions. You both are looking for more creature comforts in your transportation.
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 03:50 PM
  #23  
gmdealerguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-24-2009
Posts: 273
From: NEW YORK
Originally Posted by JeramieJJ
I like that....you know what is going to be different and are fine with that and looking forward to it. I think that brings it back full circle to the OP, asking for opinions. You both are looking for more creature comforts in your transportation.
Exactly!!! You got it!
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 08:26 AM
  #24  
mistermike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-16-2008
Posts: 662
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Kias are crap. There's no other way to put it.
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 10:16 AM
  #25  
Gas Man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-04-2010
Posts: 1,584
From: Imported from Detroit
YOu guys see the commercial for that new Nissan with a turbo. it's godawefull ugly but nevertheless. The JUKE
http://www.nissanusa.com/juke/?next=...ture.thumbnail.

EDIT: Just checked... the specs are still crap compared to our SS

1.6-liter Direct Injection Gasoline (DIG™) DOHC 16-valve turbocharged 4-cylinder engine

Horsepower – 188 hp @ 5,600 rpm

Torque – 177 lb-ft @ 2,000 – 5,200 rpm
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 07:43 AM
  #26  
jerSSey HHR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-2008
Posts: 1,664
From: jerSSey, exit 5
I saw a Chevy Cruze in person yesterday. It has a really sharp interior, and a nice exterior (looks sort of like a sized down Malibu, but better). But what's with the supposed turbo engine in the Cruze? It gets only 2 HP more than the base engine. What's the point? I guess the torque is boosted by 25 FPs. But even with a turbo, the car is sllllllooooooowwwwwwwww. Put the 2.0L turbo in the Cruze and I'll buy it tomorrow!

Powertrains and Performance

The Cruze LS is powered by a 1.8-liter inline-4 that makes 136 horsepower and 123 pound-feet of torque. The LT and LTZ (as well as the Cruze LS Eco) come with a turbocharged 1.4-liter inline-4 that generates 138 hp and 148 lb-ft of torque. The LS/LS Eco comes with a six-speed manual while the other trims come with a six-speed automatic (optional on the LS/LS Eco).

Acceleration estimates for either engine put the 0-60-mph dash between 9 and 10 seconds, about average for the class. Though official EPA fuel economy estimates were not yet available at the time of this writing, Chevrolet estimates that the Eco model with a manual transmission will get up to 40 mpg on the highway.
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 07:50 AM
  #27  
hyperv6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-05-2008
Posts: 5,464
From: Akron Ohio
Originally Posted by jerSSey HHR
I saw a Chevy Cruze in person yesterday. It has a really sharp interior, and a nice exterior (looks sort of like a sized down Malibu, but better). But what's with the supposed turbo engine in the Cruze? It gets only 2 HP more than the base engine. What's the point? I guess the torque is boosted by 25 FPs. But even with a turbo, the car is sllllllooooooowwwwwwwww.....
More Tourque and more MPG. The Cruze is not a performance car in present form. It is not all about HP.

Note GMPD is working on a SS version that is expected in and about a rear. The 2.0 engine will re appear in several HP levels in the next two years. It will be available soon in a 225 HP Regal and Regal GS with anywhwere from 255 HP-290 HP

You have to remember that the performance cars make up less than 5% of what people really buy.
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 07:57 AM
  #28  
jerSSey HHR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-2008
Posts: 1,664
From: jerSSey, exit 5
Originally Posted by hyperv6
More Tourque and more MPG. The Cruze is not a performance car in present form. It is not all about HP.

Note GMPD is working on a SS version that is expected in and about a rear. The 2.0 engine will re appear in several HP levels in the next two years. It will be available soon in a 225 HP Regal and Regal GS with anywhwere from 255 HP-290 HP

You have to remember that the performance cars make up less than 5% of what people really buy.
I understand, but it's just frustrating that once you drive something like the HHR SS, you come to expect the performance. The Cruze is a very nice car, and world's ahead of the Cobalt (which was much better than the Cavalier). It should be a big seller in the Corolla/Civic/Focus market.
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 08:22 AM
  #29  
Gas Man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-04-2010
Posts: 1,584
From: Imported from Detroit
This is exactly the point. it's a replacement of the cobalt. Pure and simple. Time will tell if it's leaps better. I did look at it, and it's a nice car. It does nothing for me but still a nice car.
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 10:46 AM
  #30  
JeramieJJ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-11-2009
Posts: 327
From: WI
Originally Posted by hyperv6
You have to remember that the performance cars make up less than 5% of what people really buy.
This is really the issue, instead of making a lesser model, etc......put the money and efforts into cost savings on the fuel efficient, performance vehicle and bring its price down to the entry level price tag. Would be great, but alas, will never be. The "masses" can not handle a performance car in ill climates......they need the snail engine to stay in a straight line.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 AM.