In the case of Chambers vs. God...
09-21-2007, 03:23 PM
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-21-2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 939
Does it seem strange or wrong to you that some law firm in Corpus Cristi is defending God and aparrently getting "responses" from him about the suit?
I'm not sure which is crazier, the guy filing the suit or the lawyers that are defending and "communicating" with God.
09-21-2007, 04:00 PM
#23
Banned
Join Date: 10-14-2005
Location: Rochester,N.Y.
Posts: 9,121
Last edited by captain howdy; 09-21-2007 at 06:26 PM.
09-21-2007, 04:47 PM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-21-2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 939
There was a part I deleted on how Christians think I'm crazy for not believing in the bible and I though believing in the bible was completely irrational. In a lot more words that is. The way I worded it could either have been viewed as either satire or demeaning. It could have been considered offensive by many who believe. I deleted it for being irrelevant and offensive before I heard any repercussions but I guess jwolfe99 saw it before deletion. That was my bad.
09-21-2007, 05:46 PM
#26
Banned
Join Date: 10-14-2005
Location: Rochester,N.Y.
Posts: 9,121
It was weird that this came up today because I was going to change my sig and my avatar today anyways. I got sick of Pepe. 
Penn is the **** if you can put up with his self-righteous atheist libertarian/Anarcho-capitalist BS. 
One of my favorite Penn quotes is, "Sure, we're smug, self-righteous, pompous and self-important *******s, but damn it, we're right!". 
For the avatar Saget because he's the man! 
Penn is the **** if you can put up with his self-righteous atheist libertarian/Anarcho-capitalist BS. One of my favorite Penn quotes is, "Sure, we're smug, self-righteous, pompous and self-important *******s, but damn it, we're right!". For the avatar Saget because he's the man!
Last edited by captain howdy; 09-21-2007 at 06:27 PM.
09-22-2007, 12:01 AM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-19-2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 20,687
I think the point the Congressman is making is that it is way to easy to file frivolous lawsuits. Which I would have to agree with. His religous beliefs have nothing to do with it.
Chambers, a self-proclaimed agnostic, said he's trying to makes the point that anybody can sue anybody. He said his filing was triggered by a federal lawsuit he considers frivolous.
09-22-2007, 10:31 AM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-05-2006
Location: Greenville, MS
Posts: 342
Julian
09-24-2007, 05:27 PM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-05-2006
Location: Greenville, MS
Posts: 342
I'm sorry. I deleted that part while you were typing because after I re-read it I though it could be considered offensive even though that wasn't my intent. Even though that's how I feel it was irrelevant to our current conversation. I should type my final thought before hitting the post button.
I deleted that part while you were typing because after I re-read it I though it could be considered offensive even though that wasn't my intent. Even though that's how I feel it was irrelevant to our current conversation. I should type my final thought before hitting the post button.