The Lounge Off Topic PG-13.
Warning: The Lounge may contain irrelevant and off topic discussions that may not be related to anything HHR. If you are not interested in these kinds of discussions, do not read or respond to these threads.

R.I.P. Pontiac

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 09:25 AM
  #61  
SOMBERSHARK0714's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-29-2008
Posts: 838
From: Oak Creek, WI
I think gm's operations as a whole would be better than they are now ( obviously) if they were never involved with saturn, hummer to begin with.

Im going to miss pontiac,if they decide to get rid of it. My dad had a '67 gto & i have had 2 t/a's '82 & '84.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 11:16 AM
  #62  
gclcpa's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-14-2009
Posts: 26
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by HHR_SS_QC
You forget the Cobalt (Cruze), which is GM's bread and butter.

IMHO, here's what GM will look like when the dust settles (at least here in Canada).

Some GM dealers will sell:

Buick
GMC (will build all GM trucks)

The other GM dealers will sell

Chevrolet
Cadillac

In the end, money $$$$$ will dictate what brands GM will retain, not our personal feelings.

I love my HHR, but, in a 5 minute search, I can still find 5 unsold 2008 HHR SS in a 200 mile area from Quebec city (and one exactly like mine, + remote start but has an all black interior). The dealer where I purchased my HHR has about 20 HHR LS LT 2009 on the lot.

Do I think the HHR will survive the current GM turmoil? Unfortunately, NO. If only the customers would buy the HHRs, then they would know how cool and useful this Lil truck is.
Yeah, I realized I forgot the Cobalt/Cruze and also the "Volt" but I was too tired/lazy to go back and edit the post.

With regard to your comment on being able to find 5 unsold 2008 HHR SS within a 200 mile radius, I know what you're saying. In metro Atlanta, there is only 1 unsold new 2008 HHR SS, but there are quite a few unsold 2009 HHR SS's within a 100 mile radius. I currently have a 2004 Pontiac GTO which I bought new in January 2005, and which I enjoy very much. However, when the GTOs came out in 2004, they couldn't give them away, and I will never understand why. The only thing I can attribute it to is that the automotive media trashed it for looking too "bland" and the lemmings in the general public allowed themselves to miss out on a great car because some idiots in the press, with their mindless, profound loyalty to all cars German and Japanese, decided it was bland looking. It looks good to me, and lots of people give it a second look as I am driving down the street. I get lots of thumbs ups from people walking by and driving by. Obviously, it's not too bland. Similarly, for whatever reason, people don't buy the HHR SS and they sit on dealer lots. With GM's upcoming "recovery" efforts, I am really afraid that they will stop making cars like the HHR SS before I am ready to buy another car for myself.

I would love to have a Chevy HHR SS, but I simply don't "need," at this point to trade the GTO in, and I cannot justify having two personal vehicles for myself. I cannot even convince my wife to get rid of her 2000 Altima GLE with nearly 120,000 miles on it; so I cannot in good conscience have two newer cars for myself while she drives around a nine year old worn out car, which she will not replace because of her concerns about the job market and economy, etc.

Why the general population in America is drawn to boring, bland, underperforming Japanese cars, I cannot understand. I guess they all enjoy driving their boring Hondas and Toyotas, but I just shudder to think that someday, those kinds of cars may be my only choices.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 11:44 AM
  #63  
hyperv6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-05-2008
Posts: 5,464
From: Akron Ohio
Originally Posted by SOMBERSHARK0714
I think gm's operations as a whole would be better than they are now ( obviously) if they were never involved with saturn, hummer to begin with.

Im going to miss pontiac,if they decide to get rid of it. My dad had a '67 gto & i have had 2 t/a's '82 & '84.
The same thing would have happend in time anyway. What was wrong with Saturn and Hummer is the same thing that was wrong with GM.

You would think company like GM would have one purchasing department, one Marketing, one customer service etc. Well they don't. It is common for GM to buy the same bearing by 17 different purchasing departments and pay 17 different prices.

GM was brought to gether form many companies but never got the run as one corperation thing down. During the Sloan era they survivd by the large scale and market share. That no longer works and GM failed to make the needed changed in the last 50 years to adapt to it. In other words they kind of work like the goverment and have a lot of waste.

THey also failed to stand up to the unions in the past and gave away more than they can afford today. It is kind of like your freedom once you give it away it is near impossible to get it back.

The Changes in the coming weeks will help save the strong parts of GM. THe wild card is the economy as there will be a buying spree once things work out but the economy will not just spring back like some think. Some of the policies the goverment is doing today is not instilling much with the Fortune 500 and Wall Street. It is time to work with them vs just jumping all over them. There are some very good companies and smart wall street people but with the way they are being treated they not going to help much. This is why they can't fill cabinet and under cabinet seats with qualified people.

Pontiac nearly died in 1980's GM gave them a second chance when the Grand Am sales were high. But the never really funded them well since the 70's. THe Fiero was funded seceretly by Pontiac and was killed by GM several times. The failings of the Fiero was mostly because the lack of Corperate support and the hate from Chevy. GM has been their own worst enemy.

As for HHR SS siting around there is just a lot of cars just sitting as nothing is selling.

The other SS factor is many people do not know what it is. GM has done little to no marketing on it and many other models so people really know little of these cars. Even the dealer books handed out has little info.

I get told that people love what I did to my HHR. When I tell them I bought it that way they are shocked and even more shocked when they find out it has a 290 HP Turbo.

GM needs to take the money they have left and market the hell out of Chevy and develope the best cars they can. THe new Malibu is as good as anything out there. But GM needs to make it better than anything out there. IF they want people to see they are different they need to give them a reason to buy their cars.

IF they fail to develope & market their cars for the future they will fall into the same trap as Packard, Studebaker, AMC and other large companieds fell into Before they closed.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 01:32 PM
  #64  
Cokeybill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-2008
Posts: 1,115
From: Oshawa
Ya !!! Wall St. has real smart people. Push paper around until the economy collapses.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #65  
Snoopy's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-09-2006
Posts: 6,805
From: "Upland" Mesa, Arizona
Originally Posted by hyperv6
Here is the rerported plan from what I have heard.

Caddy will be at least a 3 car divison with SUV of several sizes. RWD will remain as will the AWD option.

Chevy will be the value leader and offer a wide range of cars not just avaiable here but world wide.

Buick will get a lot of new product and it will be in the Lexus/Audi class. The new cars will not be old cars for th boring. The new Lacrosse will offer over 260 HP with AWD in a very classy car. I saw one and it is not like old car in any way. THey will also get sever other models one is planned on the Opel Insignia a very very good car already offered with a 320 twin turbo V6. If Buick fails millions of buyers in China will pick up the slack. That is why they live.

Cars like the G8 can be converted into ta Caprice as it is already sold as in the middle east. Not a big task to change and it can be sold here at a low Volume and make a profit.

The Solstice and Sky ? It could live on in the new Alpha platform but with the sales volume they have and they up and down cycle of the 2 seat market it may not live fast 2012=2014.

The Alpha progeam needs to be watched as the RWD platform could created many cool cars. Time will tell.

Oh GMC will make a profit as follow Chevys lead.

I'm sorry to say, this sounds like the same ol', same ol'...to me. Another blunder by the "ingenious" marketing people and "continuous management"...perhaps ??? Guess it remains to be seen. I mean, who am I. Just a little guy that watched them stumble through blunders for many years (including Wagners) and while REAL business people tried to tell them those pending decisions are the wrong direction.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 07:57 PM
  #66  
HHR_SS_QC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-29-2009
Posts: 1,097
From: Quebec City
Originally Posted by hyperv6
IF they want people to see they are different they need to give them a reason to buy their cars.

IF they fail to develope & market their cars for the future they will fall into the same trap as Packard, Studebaker, AMC and other large companieds fell into Before they closed.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #67  
hyperv6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-05-2008
Posts: 5,464
From: Akron Ohio
Originally Posted by Snoopy
I'm sorry to say, this sounds like the same ol', same ol'...to me. Another blunder by the "ingenious" marketing people and "continuous management"...perhaps ??? Guess it remains to be seen. I mean, who am I. Just a little guy that watched them stumble through blunders for many years (including Wagners) and while REAL business people tried to tell them those pending decisions are the wrong direction.
It is different this time as RIck Wagoner had been transforming the GM more in the last 8 years than anyone person has in the last 75 years.

There just was so much tha needed fixed and so littl money to do it. Also there was great resistance to his changes. At GM the lead guy does not always get what he wants as he still has to answer to a board.

Rick did make a few mistakes but he really was close to pulling this off if the economy and gas prices had not killed truck sales last year. The truck profits were paying for many of the changes as in buy outs and new product.

GM has a lot of new product just waiting to come out. We only hear about the Volt as that is all the media cares about. The Volt is a first gen show case. It will not save GM in the first Gen but it could very well set the trend for the future drivetrains in green cars. The First Prius never made a profit and the present one did little till gas prices went up. The new car is finally getting to were it needs to be. THe Volt will do much the same. It's technology will not just be in it in the future but also other GM cars in the line up.

GM once our of major debt and with much less over lap in all area will do well. Just one problem they can not control it the Economy. As it is all the companies will have problems as Toyota and Honda are also burning through cash reserves.

The biggest problem with the Auto company problems is that few people really know what is going on, what is at stake and the real needs. The other problem is often the media also does not tell the correct story or get it right half the time. ..

I know some people in GM and I also work in the performance aftermarket and get feed back on much of what is going on. There are a lot of worried people as there are still a lot of cuts coming.

Your not just a little guy you're a customer you can make a differance many have by buying other brands.

Also the people who tried to tell them also were not always right. If it were so easy to run companies like this everyone would be doing it. But from what I see on the web comments few people would have crashed GM in a week with some of their ideas.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 09:14 PM
  #68  
HHR_SS_QC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-29-2009
Posts: 1,097
From: Quebec City
GM may have a lot of trouble selling the Volt, since they dont offer rental anymore. The price of a replacement battery is going to be sky high, and when the battery is nearly exhausted, the car will have little to no resale value. I'm wondering how many years the battery will last up here in the great white north?

A $10000.00 battery replacement wil hurt the Volt sales IMHO.

http://www.hybridcars.com/economics/hidden-costs.html
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 01:17 AM
  #69  
Snoopy's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-09-2006
Posts: 6,805
From: "Upland" Mesa, Arizona
Originally Posted by hyperv6
It is different this time as RIck Wagoner had been transforming the GM more in the last 8 years than anyone person has in the last 75 years.

There just was so much tha needed fixed and so littl money to do it. Also there was great resistance to his changes. At GM the lead guy does not always get what he wants as he still has to answer to a board.

So 2-3 years ago, he commits to 200-300 million $ to develop the ZR1 (bet, they wish they had THAT money now). In an economy that is spiraling downward ....yeah, right. How about, the GTO or the SSR. And I won't even mention everyones favorite....the Aztek). Don't get me wrong. These are nice vehicles but priced AND designed into an arena that was unaccepting. Bragging rights on the ZR1 is about all they get from that. There's still a couple hundred unsold in the US and they stopped building. The celebrity owners....NASCAR drivers, Jay Leno, Senator McCain's wife...Cindy, Terry Hatcher all got extremely good deals on them so GM would have bragging rights.

And don't get me started on the GM Board of Directors. They are certainly part of GM's problem with the decisions they have made. Worthless pieces of $hi$ that get a new vehicle for free and about $20K for every meeting (and I, on 3 occasions, had to make presentations to them....so I'm not exactly virgin to them). And, nobody is even looking to make them responsible for some stupidity.

Rick did make a few mistakes but he really was close to pulling this off if the economy and gas prices had not killed truck sales last year. The truck profits were paying for many of the changes as in buy outs and new product.

Mr. Wagner was warned, 3 years ago, of the impending gas price explosion and he verbally and publicly committed to continue the financial emphasis on gas eating SUV's and large trucks. Yeah I know, he had to build what was selling just to generate revenue (and Truck Group was the darling of GM that could do no wrong and received almost everything they requested). But, why no (or very little) financial commitment to a vehicle(s) that would provide what a lot of people are, or have been looking for and the future was dictating (bad advise and direction from marketing people who conduct the consumer clinics). A little slow on the uptake, if you ask me.

GM once our of major debt and with much less over lap in all area will do well. Just one problem they can not control it the Economy. As it is all the companies will have problems as Toyota and Honda are also burning through cash reserves.

You bet they are. But they are sitting on much more liquid finances, than any "American" company.

The biggest problem with the Auto company problems is that few people really know what is going on, what is at stake and the real needs. The other problem is often the media also does not tell the correct story or get it right half the time. ..

I know some people in GM and I also work in the performance aftermarket and get feed back on much of what is going on. There are a lot of worried people as there are still a lot of cuts coming.

One piece of advise.....don't really expect these people to tell you the absolute truth. Their jobs are on the line. It is customary to provide the "company line" when you are in a management position. Been there and done that. Don't need to now...I'm retired.

Your not just a little guy you're a customer you can make a difference many have by buying other brands.

I buy GM vehicles because I get a very attractive discount and I'm STILL loyal to GM in spite of their continuing malfeasance (I can't say how much longer that will last). But I've also made contacts with the competition, when I worked for GM. Because of this I COULD purchase a competitive vehicle at an attractive price....probably much less than what one would normally expect (at least in 2 foreign competitors that I queried).

Also the people who tried to tell them also were not always right. If it were so easy to run companies like this everyone would be doing it. But from what I see on the web comments few people would have crashed GM in a week with some of their ideas.
Finally, I will say that Wagner was the most progressive CEO and President that GM had while I was employed by them. But, that's not giving much credit. Everyone, starting from the last years of Pete Estes (who had some good early years) to the present were/was/are/is horrible.


I'm off my soapbox and done venting. Besides this is off topic. But, I could tell you stories of financial stupidity that would make your tongue curl.

SORRY, to the OP and the Mod's.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 01:19 AM
  #70  
Snoopy's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-09-2006
Posts: 6,805
From: "Upland" Mesa, Arizona
Originally Posted by HHR_SS_QC
GM may have a lot of trouble selling the Volt, since they dont offer rental anymore. The price of a replacement battery is going to be sky high, and when the battery is nearly exhausted, the car will have little to no resale value. I'm wondering how many years the battery will last up here in the great white north?

A $10000.00 battery replacement wil hurt the Volt sales IMHO.

http://www.hybridcars.com/economics/hidden-costs.html
But you do know, that you get, I believe I heard or read, a $500 recycle fee for the old batteries....Right.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM.