2.0L Performance Tech 260hp (235hp auto) Turbocharged SS tuner version. 260 lb-ft of torque

Stage 1 Kit MPGs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #11  
autossblack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-31-2008
Posts: 30
From: North Georgia
Originally Posted by DMarotta
POST GM Performance Tune upgrade in a 2008 HHR SS Automatic, 1,051 highway miles driving from NC to NJ and back with cruise control set at 71 MPH, it took 2 full tanks of 93 octane gas and I averaged 31.1 MPG per the onboard computer!!!

All I can say is im very impresses, and mostlikely attribute the higher MPG to the slightly higher boost levels (-2 to -5 psi) while the car cruises after the GM Tune. More air mixed in with the same amount of fuel gives a bigger explosion with more horsepower. Kinda like Blacksmith 101, use the bellows to put more air in the fire to create a hotter fire!
Thanks for the info!!
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 12:28 PM
  #12  
Cokeybill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-2008
Posts: 1,115
From: Oshawa
Originally Posted by camaro98z28
The problem is that there is no warranty against heavy foot. I think that Foot Locker might have a fix for it. I'll get back to you soon.
I get great milage with
Bare feet and bare a__...oops!
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 05:40 PM
  #13  
millerrdjr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-29-2008
Posts: 110
From: Waterville, OH
Originally Posted by DMarotta
More air mixed in with the same amount of fuel gives a bigger explosion with more horsepower. Kinda like Blacksmith 101, use the bellows to put more air in the fire to create a hotter fire!
Does that mean that the Stage 1 tune changes the set point for the air/fuel ratio?
I wouldn't think so because more air with the same amount of fuel equals a lean condition.
I have been wrong before.
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #14  
JoeR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-02-2005
Posts: 1,245
From: VA
These ECMs are pretty much locked into maintaining stoic AFRs of near 14.7 in closed loop.

Doesn't matter what the engine/ECM is, the key is to optimize MBT (Mean Best Torque) at any cruise load with spark timing with the available fuels, altititude and octane choices. Not easy to do, but can be accomplished with a good tuner and work on a load dyno.
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 08:29 AM
  #15  
mistermike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-16-2008
Posts: 662
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Yes, more air equals a lean tune, which is the worst thing to have with a forced induction motor. The ECM maintains a stoichiometric AFR under closed loop, and goes richer in PE mode. The only time it permits a leaner than stoich condition is while decelerating in the overrun zone. Too lean not only causes destructive detonation, but it raises NOx levels as well. The LNF motor is a very complex beast with the direct injection and variable valve timing. A whole new host of variables are introduced that don't lend themselves to armchair analysis.
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 09:40 AM
  #16  
Cpt.Carnage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-09-2008
Posts: 123
From: Ontario, Canada
Quick question, what octane you running with the stage 1 kit? The max we can get in Canada is 94 (only available at Sunoco) most pumps carry a max of 91. Would I have any problems runing 91 octane fuel?
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #17  
DMarotta's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 11-28-2008
Posts: 93
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by mistermike
Yes, more air equals a lean tune, which is the worst thing to have with a forced induction motor.... A whole new host of variables are introduced that don't lend themselves to armchair analysis.
From how the *dealer* explained this to me was that the stock factory tune is generally rich to begin with. They did not have to reverse engineer any of the code being that they wrote the code to begin with. Perhaps ADM could comment on this?

Originally Posted by JoeR
...Not easy to do, but can be accomplished with a good tuner and work on a load dyno.
Being that the performace tune is a GM tune I would surmise they know exactly what they are doing. Hence I would call the GM tuners accomplished. Just my 2 cents.
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 07:24 AM
  #18  
mistermike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-16-2008
Posts: 662
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Originally Posted by DMarotta
From how the *dealer* explained this to me was that the stock factory tune is generally rich to begin with. They did not have to reverse engineer any of the code being that they wrote the code to begin with. Perhaps ADM could comment on this?



Being that the performace tune is a GM tune I would surmise they know exactly what they are doing. Hence I would call the GM tuners accomplished. Just my 2 cents.
I take much of what is said by dealers with a grain of salt. All cars run at an AFR of 14.7 in closed loop. I still have the stock tune on mine, and I monitor the AFR with a DashHawk. Unless I mash it, it's nailed down at stoich. In fact, since the SS uses a wideband oxygen sensor, mixture control is especially precise. LTFT's are under 5 in most cells. The LNF's ability to alter valve and injector timing opens up a whole range of control over the motor that doesn't affect AFR in the conventional sense. We aftermarket tuners are pretty much going to be at the other end of the learning curve for the near term. Factory guys have tools we can only dream about.
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 02:11 PM
  #19  
camaro98z28's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-23-2008
Posts: 1,148
From: Peoria, AZ
Originally Posted by Cpt.Carnage
Quick question, what octane you running with the stage 1 kit? The max we can get in Canada is 94 (only available at Sunoco) most pumps carry a max of 91. Would I have any problems runing 91 octane fuel?
Nope. I have 91 oct and it runs like a cheetah
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 02:12 PM
  #20  
camaro98z28's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-23-2008
Posts: 1,148
From: Peoria, AZ
Originally Posted by DMarotta
From how the *dealer* explained this to me was that the stock factory tune is generally rich to begin with. They did not have to reverse engineer any of the code being that they wrote the code to begin with. Perhaps ADM could comment on this?



Being that the performace tune is a GM tune I would surmise they know exactly what they are doing. Hence I would call the GM tuners accomplished. Just my 2 cents.
from what I know, the guys from HPT would love to know whats in their heads.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.