2.2L Performance Tech 16 valve 143 hp EcoTec with 150 lb-ft of torque

Speed govenor....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 02:50 PM
  #11  
NJHK's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-25-2006
Posts: 37
From: Hendersonville, TN
Originally Posted by Black Beauty
I`m hoping that was tongue in cheek, NJHK, you guys be careful out there. The HHR is`nt a sports car, more like a Station wagon/ Brick. Doubt if 165mph is something a stock or slightly modded veh. should be doing especially on the public roads.
lol I was just playin. I don't even own an HHR, I'm just an avid ECOTEC enthusiast.
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #12  
Black Beauty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-2006
Posts: 2,334
From: Chicago,IL
I know, saw your sig, but you see it didn`t take long before someone thought this would be a good time to bash a PT.
Get over this "PT HATER" thing Guys/Gals, one day we`ll be #2 on the block. Trust me...
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #13  
en0oNmAI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-13-2006
Posts: 1,059
From: Tucson, AZ
BB= this was a joking matter and if you notice a LOT of people bash the pt's. Its all in good fun. I'm sure the PT guys are bashing us just the same. Its like 2 rival colleges. But we don't know the PT's mascot to steal and last I knew the gnome was safe. Geesh some peoples kids! HAHAHA
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 09:57 PM
  #14  
Black Beauty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-2006
Posts: 2,334
From: Chicago,IL
I`ve never gone to a PT site, possibly they discuss the HHR in jest. We don`t really have to be haters because they hate on us. Puts us in their class.
Like I and others have said before, we own the PT some credit/respect for being a fore-runner to the HHR. I`m sure that the original 2001 owners thought then as we do now, We`re #1. You certainly can`t see who the next #1 guy will be 5 yrs from now, and maybe you`ll go to that team and never look back. But bashing just to be bashing isn`t fun or cool. ( to me )
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #15  
captain howdy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 9,121
From: Rochester,N.Y.
Originally Posted by Black Beauty
But bashing just to be bashing isn`t fun or cool. ( to me )
Some comedians and political media types make a living off of it.
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 11:08 PM
  #16  
marklo's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-09-2007
Posts: 21
From: NY
too bad you dont have an automatic,put trans in I mode keeps in 3rd and gov doesnt come on at 115 you run out of road, and have wind resistanse,they get loosy goosey on slight bumps, so much many would wish for more power and better suspension
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 11:28 PM
  #17  
Big Kahuna's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-06-2006
Posts: 1,222
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by Black Beauty
I know, saw your sig, but you see it didn`t take long before someone thought this would be a good time to bash a PT.
Get over this "PT HATER" thing Guys/Gals, one day we`ll be #2 on the block. Trust me...
Originally Posted by en0oNmAI
BB= this was a joking matter and if you notice a LOT of people bash the pt's. Its all in good fun. I'm sure the PT guys are bashing us just the same. Its like 2 rival colleges. But we don't know the PT's mascot to steal and last I knew the gnome was safe. Geesh some peoples kids! HAHAHA
Originally Posted by Black Beauty
I`ve never gone to a PT site, possibly they discuss the HHR in jest. We don`t really have to be haters because they hate on us. Puts us in their class.
Like I and others have said before, we own the PT some credit/respect for being a fore-runner to the HHR. I`m sure that the original 2001 owners thought then as we do now, We`re #1. You certainly can`t see who the next #1 guy will be 5 yrs from now, and maybe you`ll go to that team and never look back. But bashing just to be bashing isn`t fun or cool. ( to me )

I figure most PT bashing is just rivaly since both vehicles were actually designed by the same automotive designer Brian Nesbitt who designed the HHR off of the original PT Cruiser after leaving Chrysler to work for GM.



Actually, there is not much HHR bashing on any of the PT sites I've ever visited. I think most PT owners are quite interested in the HHR retro design. Both vehicles have pros and cons and I can definitely speak from experience.

How would I know... I own one of each and love them both...



Name:  Cruisetothelake.jpg
Views: 194
Size:  42.6 KB

Last edited by Big Kahuna; Mar 24, 2008 at 12:12 AM.
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #18  
The Curly 1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-08-2008
Posts: 505
From: United States of Texas
Top Speed

The faster you go the more horsepwer it takes. The faster you go aerodynamics become more important. Over say 135 lowering the car, wind dam on front, smoothing up underside, removing side mirrors etc can make a significant difference.
To make the car accelerate faster it takes more horsepower and lighterwieght. (providing you have the traction) To make it top end faster more horsepower and better aerodynamics. Weight is not quite as critical in top speed. No amount of horsepower will make something that is really bad aerodynamicaly go fast. I had a 64 Chevy van and it simply would not go over maybe 100 before it start spinning the tires.
Where it may take 140 hp to push the HHR to 120 it may take 300 to push it to 130 and 450 to make it run 140. I am not sure of the actual numbers but it takes MUCH more horsepower as you get faster. I guarentee you the stock HHR will not go 165 if you disabled the rev limiter. On my drag race car going from 400 hp to 800 hp the car went from 130 to 150 MPH in the quarter mile. If that same car was set up for top speed only it would do about 150 mph with 400 hp and about 175 with 800 hp. My car is very light and aerodynamically clean. I doubt the HHR is as good so it may take more than 500 hp just to get to 150.
To tell you the truth I was very surprised (pleased, impressed) when mine went about 110 mph. It did not hit the rev limiter but I do not think there was much more there anyway.
The rev limiters are usually set below the cars top speed capability and the then they choose the tires for that speed, load range etc.
As for the PT haters, I liked the PT when they came out but not enough to buy one. I think the HHR looks much better but for those who have the PT's and like them that is great.
The HHR it is what it is... It was designed to be a versatile economy car with a retro look. It is not a hot rod or racecar, it is not a tow truck or a bus. It gets good gas mileage, looks good, has a decent stereo and air conditioning and is kind of fun to drive for an economy car. For what it is designed for it is very good.
Old May 3, 2008 | 02:40 PM
  #19  
ecl's Avatar
ecl
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-09-2008
Posts: 725
From: Elko Nevada
Well Im not sure were the governers set but I had mine to 110 and no cut off, I ended up letting off because there were two semis in front of me taking up both lanes and I know it wasnt me just miss reading the speedometer because I also had my gps which gives you speed read outs.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Drifter.
General HHR
13
Jan 21, 2016 06:48 PM
XtremeSS
Drivetrain (Excluding Engine)
15
Jan 28, 2015 12:25 PM
Mcw032391
General HHR
8
Jun 1, 2012 08:37 PM
slimsol
General HHR
25
May 1, 2010 09:41 AM
Clevelandhhrss
HHR SS
51
May 4, 2008 02:18 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 PM.