Intake Comparison Results
#21
Originally Posted by SoCalHHR
I've done my part to "better the HHR community" - and now I'm done. If you want to see the actual charts go buy your own intakes and pay to have them dyno'd yourself - then you'll see what idiots you are acting like....
:twothumbs
#22
Mike,
Thanks for the dyno charts. I think the more info. we have the better off all of us will be!
Thanks for the dyno charts. I think the more info. we have the better off all of us will be!
#23
More air is always better than restricted air. I am certain that the Airaid would not have performed any better having the top portion closed and forcing it to get air from the tube.
As for the questions regarding other work on Mikes HHR-that is all a moot point. His comparison was showing the relative difference between the 2 intake systems. It would not matter any other mods he had, as long as they were all working for both intake dyno's. As for the HP reading, they were probably front wheel horsepower, whereas the Chevy claim of 172 is just the engine not factoring in drivetrain loss.
I do not understand all the aggression. Mike is not strictly in the business for making money. Remember-he only sells HHR parts, and began selling parts only after he bought the car himself. Most businesses sell for more than one vehicle. I believe Mike is interested in improving his car, and has gotten involved working with different companies to develop parts for the HHR. He is providing more of a service for us than trying to get get rich. I am certain that if the Airaid proved to be a good product, he would gladly offer it for sale.
The company that did the dyno had no vested interest, nor were they biased. I can understand the frustration of those who plunked down $200 only to discover that all they have done is increased intake noise and decreased their performance. We live in a free world/democracy. Anybody that doubts the accuracy of Mikes test is welcome to buy both systems and test them for themselves. I for one trust Mike and will order the CGS system as soon as I finish posting this thread. I prefered the looks, anyway.
As for the questions regarding other work on Mikes HHR-that is all a moot point. His comparison was showing the relative difference between the 2 intake systems. It would not matter any other mods he had, as long as they were all working for both intake dyno's. As for the HP reading, they were probably front wheel horsepower, whereas the Chevy claim of 172 is just the engine not factoring in drivetrain loss.
I do not understand all the aggression. Mike is not strictly in the business for making money. Remember-he only sells HHR parts, and began selling parts only after he bought the car himself. Most businesses sell for more than one vehicle. I believe Mike is interested in improving his car, and has gotten involved working with different companies to develop parts for the HHR. He is providing more of a service for us than trying to get get rich. I am certain that if the Airaid proved to be a good product, he would gladly offer it for sale.
The company that did the dyno had no vested interest, nor were they biased. I can understand the frustration of those who plunked down $200 only to discover that all they have done is increased intake noise and decreased their performance. We live in a free world/democracy. Anybody that doubts the accuracy of Mikes test is welcome to buy both systems and test them for themselves. I for one trust Mike and will order the CGS system as soon as I finish posting this thread. I prefered the looks, anyway.
#24
Originally Posted by Lee3333
I do not understand all the aggression. Mike is not strictly in the business for making money. Remember-he only sells HHR parts, and began selling parts only after he bought the car himself. Most businesses sell for more than one vehicle. I believe Mike is interested in improving his car, and has gotten involved working with different companies to develop parts for the HHR. He is providing more of a service for us than trying to get get rich. I am certain that if the Airaid proved to be a good product, he would gladly offer it for sale.
#25
Originally Posted by SoCalHHR
The intake comparison page is now up on our site for those interested.
You can find it HERE.
I think many will be surprised at the results...
You can find it HERE.
I think many will be surprised at the results...
#26
Originally Posted by SoCalHHR
If you want to see the actual charts go buy your own intakes and pay to have them dyno'd yourself - then you'll see what idiots you are acting like....
I kiss no ones ass. BUT I do stand up for what I believe in. And when I see someone being bashed without cause, I will be right there to defend him.
#27
Originally Posted by BlackHHR
Anything is better than stock!
#28
[QUOTE=
I kiss no ones ass. BUT I do stand up for what I believe in. And when I see someone being bashed without cause, I will be right there to defend him.[/QUOTE]
Same here. Why can't we all just get along.
Don't be haten
I kiss no ones ass. BUT I do stand up for what I believe in. And when I see someone being bashed without cause, I will be right there to defend him.[/QUOTE]
Same here. Why can't we all just get along.
Don't be haten
#29
Originally Posted by Lee3333
Sorry to disagree, but plunking down money and losing horsepower is not better than stock.
#30
I appologize Lee, you definitely deserve it. But he turned his frustration towards me for asking a simple question and believing the numbers are a little biased towards the one he has his money invested in. Look at it from a buisness stand point. You are a small retailer that has your time and money invested in a product. You think your product is going to be the only one on the market so you know people are going to be ordering them left and right. All of a sudden a cheaper possibly better working system hits the market and all of your potential customers start snatching it up. What would you do? The place that did the dyno comparison may have been unbiased but the person paying for it wasn't. That's why he's afraid to show the actual dyno graphs.