2.4L Performance Tech 16 valve 172 hp EcoTec with 162 lb-ft of torque

Lighter pullies installed -md- HHR this is for you

Old Jun 15, 2007 | 08:40 AM
  #61  
cperez1217's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-27-2006
Posts: 171
From: Miami,FL
cool now how can i buy them hehehehehe
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #62  
HHR SS's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-05-2007
Posts: 10
From: GA
Im sold and Ihavent even bought my HHR yet.
i did the smaller pulley on my Impala SS but its a 8cy so the gain was very small if any but I did it anyway in the hopes that with the other mods it would add something
Later
Bernie
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 01:35 PM
  #63  
Snoopy's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-09-2006
Posts: 6,805
From: "Upland" Mesa, Arizona
-MD-HHR.....

I know Hutter Performance, who performed your dyno tests.. Strong, reliable, honest, knowledgeable people. They tend to do "things" the right way (had them do some work for a previous employer, some years ago...they were requested because of their expertise).

For those interested, I suggest you go to Hutter's website and review their dyno procedures. For example, and I don't wish to "whip a dead horse", but they do their pulls with the hood closed and HD fans blowing into the cooling area......not with the hood UP, which provides BEST CASE SCENARIO AND INACCURATE DATA.
That is the way I have participated and witnessed hundreds of dyno tests.....contrary to what was stated previously, in this forum. This method provides a more accurate account of actual "road" experience.

So I guess, at this point, I'm a believer of lighter/smaller is better (until proven otherwise).
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 01:39 PM
  #64  
betterof2evils4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-2006
Posts: 1,198
From: Enid, Oklahoma
That wouldn't make any kind of sense at all, performing a dyno with the hood up. You want to know how the vehicle would perform under natural conditions, not ideal circumstances. I don't know about you all, but I like to drive with my hood down

Now a few knowledgeable people "approve this message," which makes it credible in my eyes.
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #65  
Snoopy's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-09-2006
Posts: 6,805
From: "Upland" Mesa, Arizona
Originally Posted by betterof2evils4
That wouldn't make any kind of sense at all, performing a dyno with the hood up. You want to know how the vehicle would perform under natural conditions, not ideal circumstances. I don't know about you all, but I like to drive with my hood down

Now a few knowledgeable people "approve this message," which makes it credible in my eyes.
My intent, was not to rehash that issue. So, let's not start that again. Only to indicate the method employed by the initial provider of the service data.
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 02:22 PM
  #66  
betterof2evils4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-2006
Posts: 1,198
From: Enid, Oklahoma
I didn't know that had been an issue in the past. My bad...
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #67  
-md- HHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-23-2006
Posts: 578
From: Northeast Ohio in the Lake
Originally Posted by Snoopy
-MD-HHR.....

For those interested, I suggest you go to Hutter's website and review their dyno procedures. For example, and I don't wish to "whip a dead horse", but they do their pulls with the hood closed and HD fans blowing into the cooling area......not with the hood UP, which provides BEST CASE SCENARIO AND INACCURATE DATA.
I have never seen a dyno done with the hood closed...ever.
Where are these procedures you speak of?
Link to Hutter Chassis Dyno Page
Also how would the dyno be inaccurate with the hood open?.....and if it was it was done the same way before the pulleys and after the pulleys.

Last edited by -md- HHR; Jun 15, 2007 at 02:29 PM. Reason: Added More
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 02:33 PM
  #68  
betterof2evils4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-2006
Posts: 1,198
From: Enid, Oklahoma
Technically, if you did both dynos (before and after) with the hood open, it should show the same ratio increase in hp as with the hood down. More airflow because the hood is open, however, might change the end result to be different from normal driving experience. That's my guess...
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 05:31 PM
  #69  
Snoopy's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-09-2006
Posts: 6,805
From: "Upland" Mesa, Arizona
Originally Posted by -md- HHR
I have never seen a dyno done with the hood closed...ever.
Where are these procedures you speak of?
Link to Hutter Chassis Dyno Page
Also how would the dyno be inaccurate with the hood open?.....and if it was it was done the same way before the pulleys and after the pulleys.
I used the word "procedure" and shouldn't have. I was referring to the picture details displayed on their website. Several appear to be under test with the hood closed and a fan in front (also front overhead door slightly open).

As far as data....didn't say the dyno was inaccurate AND I SAID NOTHING ABOUT THE PULLEYS.....at this point, as stated, I believe you and others, about the pulleys.

I said the DATA could be inacurate (in some cases, dependent on what is tested). For example, if a comp is made between OEM intake and an aftermarket intake, and the hood is open, you do have a comparison. But, a hood open revealing the exposed air filter, is a little slanted. And provides more "unrestricted" direct cooler airflow, than it would to an OEM that requires air to move through a "tunnel" to get to the air box. I'm not saying there is nothing gained. Just saying the gain, in real life, may not be what is reported...

Again, I am not challenging the statements regarding the "release" of HP to the rear wheels...I believe it.

The dyno tests that I witnessed, were performed in a barometric chamber, that controled the temperature, humidity, pressure, and wind velocity, etc. The instrumentation had the ability to duplicate, essentially, any city in the world on a given day..... and the hoods were down. It's the same method used to provide and certify EPA Mileage standards for any given vehicle (I heard, they can duplicate rain storms as well....but, i think they may have been pulling my leg, with that). Probably terribly expensive to build, so the availability is limited in the aftermarket world.
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 06:26 PM
  #70  
en0oNmAI's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-13-2006
Posts: 1,059
From: Tucson, AZ
Either way. Md was right, as were us "youngins" and MD was able to PROVE this. Way to go MD for an outstanding product.

Now there's only one question left. Where can I find these wonderful pulleys MD???? If need be PM me any info. And thanks again! :twothumbs

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.