General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

2.2 or 2.4

Old Apr 24, 2011 | 08:08 PM
  #11  
KINGSHIPLEY's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 08-20-2010
Posts: 190
From: INDIANAPOLIS,IN
The 2.2l gets me to work on time no issues ith sluggy or lack of power
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 09:14 PM
  #12  
THE BATMAN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-26-2008
Posts: 4,152
From: N.W. Burbs Chicago
2.0
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 09:36 PM
  #13  
Catch 22's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-26-2011
Posts: 10
From: Cut-n-Shoot,Texas
I've got a 2.4, average 25.5-27 MPG driving back and forth to work 36 miles each way. I do notice it seems to like Texaco/Chevron Premium. Highway mileage is just over 30 MPG.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 09:37 PM
  #14  
Greybeard999's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-06-2010
Posts: 6,869
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by THE BATMAN
2.0
It wasn't one of the options asked about by the OP......
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 10:01 PM
  #15  
tim75901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 03-16-2011
Posts: 44
From: lufkin, tx
2.4 it is haha. I am curious about one other thing cause i found a 2008 with the 2.4 and the 2009 with a 2.4 that has flex fuel. Does flex fuel equipped HHRs run the same?
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 10:05 PM
  #16  
Greybeard999's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-06-2010
Posts: 6,869
From: Ohio
They are supposed to, they just have the option to run the E85.... On corn the engine makes adjustments.... On gasoline it's supposed to be the same as earlier models. Is it in a side by side "drag race"? Who knows.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 10:10 PM
  #17  
tim75901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 03-16-2011
Posts: 44
From: lufkin, tx
I have been told by a friend that owns a shop that i should stay away from flex fuel models because parts cost more...I don't know if thats true or not
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 12:17 AM
  #18  
sleeper's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 01-09-2007
Posts: 16,081
From: SE USA
I'm happy with my pre-Flex 2.4, does what I need.
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 05:54 AM
  #19  
prod's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-14-2007
Posts: 2,964
From: Toronto ON Canada
Also note the 2009+ 2.2 got more power than the older 2.2 due to adding the vvt system from the 2.4, so difference in perforance isnt as much now.
And I wouldnt trade in your 2008 for a 2009, you will probably lose thousands of $$$ on it.
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 11:04 AM
  #20  
BlackknighT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-29-2009
Posts: 1,813
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by prod
Also note the 2009+ 2.2 got more power than the older 2.2 due to adding the vvt system from the 2.4, so difference in perforance isnt as much now.
And I wouldnt trade in your 2008 for a 2009, you will probably lose thousands of $$$ on it.
What Prod said!

I have the 09 2.2 and love it. If your in an older 2.2 0r 2.4 and see skulls in your rear view-get atta da way!

(2.0's need not apply)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.