General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

2.2 or 2.4

Old Apr 28, 2011 | 06:36 AM
  #21  
interrex's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-16-2011
Posts: 66
From: North central Indiana
Originally Posted by tim75901
I have a 2008 HHR LT and thinking about buying a 2009 HHR LT with a 2.4 flex fuel that has more options. I would like to know if the 2.4 with flex fuel is a good choice.
They did not have flex fuel back in 2007 as an option, wish they did. I do not burn premium in my 2.4L as it screams just fine. Want to race?
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 06:41 AM
  #22  
solman98's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-2006
Posts: 6,053
From: Dallas, GA
I love these threads considering the performance numbers between the 2.2 and 2.4 are not that much different.
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 09:25 AM
  #23  
SS fan's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-09-2010
Posts: 14,420
From: Tacoma
Bat man already said it but if your shopping just try one 2.0 its the baby that rules the HHR roost.
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 06:35 PM
  #24  
otacon's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-02-2010
Posts: 35
From: Phoenix
Picking up my 2011 HHR tomorrow with a 2.2. Wanted to get the LT but getting laid off from my job put a damper on that; getting an LS. Kind of ironic that I get my first brand new car when I'm unemployed..lol. I did get the Pioneer speaker option w/sub w/My Link package....gotta have my tunes..lol
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 07:27 PM
  #25  
Greybeard999's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-06-2010
Posts: 6,869
From: Ohio
Enjoy the new ride!
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 08:01 PM
  #26  
otacon's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-02-2010
Posts: 35
From: Phoenix
Originally Posted by Greybeard999
Enjoy the new ride!
Thanks...haven't driven a standard in years...lol Didn't want the auto since my company HHR had one and it was terrible in the snow. At least it was for me.
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 09:44 PM
  #27  
87silver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-15-2008
Posts: 1,599
From: Newburgh, NY
Originally Posted by tim75901
I have a 2008 HHR LT and thinking about buying a 2009 HHR LT with a 2.4 flex fuel that has more options. I would like to know if the 2.4 with flex fuel is a good choice.
Why don't you just ask each member which engine that they own? Of course, each one is going to be biased to their own purchase... I have the "little" 2.0. Duh, I wish I had a 2.4 because it's bigger? You'll never be able to get the virtues of each engine by asking owners unless an engine is a dud. In this case, all 3 Eco's have their place.
Old Apr 30, 2011 | 06:21 PM
  #28  
tim75901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 03-16-2011
Posts: 44
From: lufkin, tx
Originally Posted by 87silver
Why don't you just ask each member which engine that they own? Of course, each one is going to be biased to their own purchase... I have the "little" 2.0. Duh, I wish I had a 2.4 because it's bigger? You'll never be able to get the virtues of each engine by asking owners unless an engine is a dud. In this case, all 3 Eco's have their place.
???
Old Apr 30, 2011 | 06:55 PM
  #29  
Doctuh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 580
From: Shreveport, LA
auto vs manual

There is a major performance difference between the manual and the automatic transmission versions of the HHR. The 2.2 with an automatic is pretty anemic. That combination is slow enough that I would not consider it. The 2.4 with manual accelerates much more strongly. Mileage is similar throughout. Manual 2.2 and auto 2.4s fall somewhere between these non-SS extremes. Girlfriend and I each went for the (rare) 2.4 manual and love it! Clearly, its the next hottest thing compared to that unmentionable 2.0!
Old Apr 30, 2011 | 07:07 PM
  #30  
tim75901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 03-16-2011
Posts: 44
From: lufkin, tx
Originally Posted by Doctuh
There is a major performance difference between the manual and the automatic transmission versions of the HHR. The 2.2 with an automatic is pretty anemic. That combination is slow enough that I would not consider it. The 2.4 with manual accelerates much more strongly. Mileage is similar throughout. Manual 2.2 and auto 2.4s fall somewhere between these non-SS extremes. Girlfriend and I each went for the (rare) 2.4 manual and love it! Clearly, its the next hottest thing compared to that unmentionable 2.0!
I didn't buy the 2009 with the 2.4 so i am stuck with my 2008 with the 2.2 with the automatic

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.