Which is better -- 2.2 (LS) or 2.4 (2LT)??? Looking to buy...

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 22, 2009 | 09:03 PM

#31

HillsdaleHHR

Senior Member

Joined: 08-20-2006

Posts: 21,640

From: Hillsdale, Michigan

Back on topic guys. If you want to continue your discussion take it to PMs

Feb 22, 2009 | 10:30 PM

#32

BJ D

Thread Starter

New Member

Joined: 02-21-2009

Posts: 16

From: Iowa

Quote:

Originally Posted by wxman

That 2LT for $12000 looks like way better deal to me.

thanks for the opinion! attached is a pic of the 2LT. $12k, 25k miles

Feb 22, 2009 | 10:31 PM

#33

masterchief1112

Senior Member

Joined: 06-04-2008

Posts: 1,882

From: Toledo, OH

id go 2lt personally

Feb 22, 2009 | 11:57 PM

#34

KinseySS

Senior Member

Joined: 04-26-2008

Posts: 292

From: Vancouver

Lnf 2.0

Feb 23, 2009 | 11:36 AM

#35

GTOMIKE

Senior Member

Joined: 06-27-2006

Posts: 732

From: Kingsville On

Quote:

Originally Posted by 09 Panel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VVT

At least for my Panel which has the 2.2 and an the auto tranny the window sticker shows the Engine and the Transmission are both made the in the United States.

Not all the auto transmissions are made in Windsor Ontario Canada so your sticker is wrong and who ever released that information is over paid.

Feb 23, 2009 | 12:00 PM

#36

solman98

Senior Member

Joined: 07-17-2006

Posts: 6,053

From: Dallas, GA

Quote:

Originally Posted by jx3

The 1LT is basically a LS w/ the mid level radio (AM/FM/single CD player w/o XM). Everything else that is standard w/ the 2 LT is optional for the 1LT, except the suspension.

Don't forget that the 1LT also addes alloy wheels to the LS's steelies.... And the power seat already mentioned.

Best bet, drive both and see what you like. Don't worry about resale value. If you look at KBB or other sites, there are very few options that make any differance at "resale".