Losing oil through exhaust
I would not expect anything to be in the catch can after only 50 miles. It's already been said that you have low compression in all 4 cylinders, so that is probably the problem.
I just re-read your post #21. You said there was even oil on the MAF sensor. There is another check valve right there, where the line into the valve cover snaps into the air inlet hose. If that valve is bad, it could dump oil into the inlet hose, and the tiny snorkel in there could blow it onto the MAF, and then run back down to the turbo.
I just re-read your post #21. You said there was even oil on the MAF sensor. There is another check valve right there, where the line into the valve cover snaps into the air inlet hose. If that valve is bad, it could dump oil into the inlet hose, and the tiny snorkel in there could blow it onto the MAF, and then run back down to the turbo.
I would not expect anything to be in the catch can after only 50 miles. It's already been said that you have low compression in all 4 cylinders, so that is probably the problem.
I just re-read your post #21. You said there was even oil on the MAF sensor. There is another check valve right there, where the line into the valve cover snaps into the air inlet hose. If that valve is bad, it could dump oil into the inlet hose, and the tiny snorkel in there could blow it onto the MAF, and then run back down to the turbo.
I just re-read your post #21. You said there was even oil on the MAF sensor. There is another check valve right there, where the line into the valve cover snaps into the air inlet hose. If that valve is bad, it could dump oil into the inlet hose, and the tiny snorkel in there could blow it onto the MAF, and then run back down to the turbo.
Ok. Went to different store to get compression gauge. This time measured it dry and wet. The reading for dry were 130,125,125,130. The wet test showed 140,135,130,140. Am I f...ed??
From an old thread: Per GM, the readings for the 2.0/2.2/2.4 Ecotec engines should be between 155-180psi in each cylinder on a compression test, GM specs state that there should not be more than a 70% variation between the highest and lowest cylinder.
So his readings are WAY low as noted in several posts earlier.
From: https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/ss-s...on-test-55768/
So his readings are WAY low as noted in several posts earlier.
From: https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/ss-s...on-test-55768/
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdelanjo
Audio and Video
8
Aug 26, 2020 07:13 PM
Lone Ranger
Problems/Service/Repairs
5
Jul 18, 2008 09:32 PM



