Barry Bonds Closing in on Home Run Record
Where is the evidence to support that statement? I have seen no accusations or proof Pujols has taken any performance enhancing substance whatsoever. He is basically the same size now that he was as a rookie, and his numbers are very consistent. Seems a bit hypocritical to on one hand defend bonds saying he is innocent until proven guilty, and then accuse Pujols of cheating with NO evidence. 

No formal charges to my knowledge, but it would come as no surprise to me (his dodging of testimony in court more or less made my mind up) - hence why you wouldn't get an argument from me as to whether the * would be applicable there.
so our ENTIRE federal government cannot convict him? seems absurd doesnt it? i mean if he is really juicing, dont you believe our legal system would have found him guilty already? public opinion is, well like an arsehole.



Agreed!! I wouldn't go to watch this phony play if the Stadium was across the street, and I got in for free!