The Lounge Off Topic PG-13.
Warning: The Lounge may contain irrelevant and off topic discussions that may not be related to anything HHR. If you are not interested in these kinds of discussions, do not read or respond to these threads.

Barry Bonds Closing in on Home Run Record

Old Aug 8, 2007 | 01:00 PM
  #61  
Alzonie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-23-2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by Firewatcher
Bonds is a farce. The record should not be allowed to stand.
Agreed!! I wouldn't go to watch this phony play if the Stadium was across the street, and I got in for free!
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #62  
quest51210's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-12-2007
Posts: 897
From: san antonio,tx
Originally Posted by mizzouHHR
Where is the evidence to support that statement? I have seen no accusations or proof Pujols has taken any performance enhancing substance whatsoever. He is basically the same size now that he was as a rookie, and his numbers are very consistent. Seems a bit hypocritical to on one hand defend bonds saying he is innocent until proven guilty, and then accuse Pujols of cheating with NO evidence.
exactly...you proved my point. end of story
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #63  
Vivid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-2007
Posts: 226
From: Kansas City, Misery
Originally Posted by quest51210
i guess you could throw that in for your boy McGuire as well
He holds no records, but if he did, yes it would be applicable.
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 07:56 PM
  #64  
quest51210's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-12-2007
Posts: 897
From: san antonio,tx
Originally Posted by Vivid
He holds no records, but if he did, yes it would be applicable.
so they have been formally charged?
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 01:09 AM
  #65  
Vivid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-2007
Posts: 226
From: Kansas City, Misery
No formal charges to my knowledge, but it would come as no surprise to me (his dodging of testimony in court more or less made my mind up) - hence why you wouldn't get an argument from me as to whether the * would be applicable there.
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 03:16 AM
  #66  
quest51210's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-12-2007
Posts: 897
From: san antonio,tx
so our ENTIRE federal government cannot convict him? seems absurd doesnt it? i mean if he is really juicing, dont you believe our legal system would have found him guilty already? public opinion is, well like an arsehole.
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 04:08 AM
  #67  
Vivid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-2007
Posts: 226
From: Kansas City, Misery
Hell, there are a lot of things that our federal government can't get right, but that's a whole other conversation for another place and time.
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 04:53 AM
  #68  
quest51210's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-12-2007
Posts: 897
From: san antonio,tx
so one guy Vs. a few hundred investigators?
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 06:09 AM
  #69  
laborkei's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-2007
Posts: 172
From: Marietta, GA
If he get's convicted of useing drugs, he should be allowed to have it.
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #70  
Goose's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-31-2007
Posts: 2,479
From: New Hampsha
Barry who? Yawn....Hammering Hank will always be the HR king...

Goose

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 PM.