GM cutting 10,000 jobs
#11
There are some folks who actually NEED trucks and truck-based SUV's. That base will always be there, and may have just postponed purchases. Obviously the key is finding out what that normal sales volume will be for the foreseeable future in that area. I found the ideal balance in having a 3/4 ton p/u and an HHR commuter, but eventually that truck will need to be replaced too.
The new (F-150) version, Ford executives said, is aimed directly at buyers who need trucks for work and other practical purposes, rather than because of their macho image.
“We’re not going after those ‘never, never’ customers, meaning those people who have never hauled anything or never towed anything,” Mr. Farley (Ford’s vice president for sales and communications) said.
“We’re not going after those ‘never, never’ customers, meaning those people who have never hauled anything or never towed anything,” Mr. Farley (Ford’s vice president for sales and communications) said.
I was a never, never, well hardly ever, and now I don't. Bye bye, 13mpg Dodge! It was good when gas was 90 cents a gallon. I hired a pickup for the one job in the last year when I needed a pickup.
#12
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/31/business/31ford.html
I was a never, never, well hardly ever, and now I don't. Bye bye, 13mpg Dodge! It was good when gas was 90 cents a gallon. I hired a pickup for the one job in the last year when I needed a pickup.
I was a never, never, well hardly ever, and now I don't. Bye bye, 13mpg Dodge! It was good when gas was 90 cents a gallon. I hired a pickup for the one job in the last year when I needed a pickup.
#13
I used to drive this truck as my daily driver back when diesel was about a buck a gallon....
#14
Everyone that wants to blame GM for their own failures has some validity in their posts. But GM didn't ruin this economy, Sub Prime Lenders and Wall Street who bought the loans f'd us. GM's problem right now is the same as Toyota's. NO ONE IS BUYING!
If you say GM is at fault for building SUV's that people wanted to buy, then you need to think about that statement and relearn supply and demand theories.
Here is another prime example of the banks/lending institutions still sticking it to us. Now they are doing it with OUR money that WE bailed them out with. While GM is cutting pay they are rewarding bad business decisions. Just food for thought.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29137662/
If you say GM is at fault for building SUV's that people wanted to buy, then you need to think about that statement and relearn supply and demand theories.
Here is another prime example of the banks/lending institutions still sticking it to us. Now they are doing it with OUR money that WE bailed them out with. While GM is cutting pay they are rewarding bad business decisions. Just food for thought.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29137662/
#15
Everyone that wants to blame GM for their own failures has some validity in their posts. But GM didn't ruin this economy, Sub Prime Lenders and Wall Street who bought the loans f'd us. GM's problem right now is the same as Toyota's. NO ONE IS BUYING!
If you say GM is at fault for building SUV's that people wanted to buy, then you need to think about that statement and relearn supply and demand theories.
Here is another prime example of the banks/lending institutions still sticking it to us. Now they are doing it with OUR money that WE bailed them out with. While GM is cutting pay they are rewarding bad business decisions. Just food for thought.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29137662/
If you say GM is at fault for building SUV's that people wanted to buy, then you need to think about that statement and relearn supply and demand theories.
Here is another prime example of the banks/lending institutions still sticking it to us. Now they are doing it with OUR money that WE bailed them out with. While GM is cutting pay they are rewarding bad business decisions. Just food for thought.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29137662/
They also should have left Saturn as the "import fighter" instead, it blew up into more than it should have with SUV's and crossovers.
#16
I'm not going to argue with you there. But there is the other side of that coin IMO. GM didn't put a lot of effort into small cars either. I know several in the business and they all tell me they hated it when someone came in to buy a Cobalt, no money. Now if Honda can make a Civic that still sells well and makes them money, why can't GM do that with a small car? Granted this economy is hurting all of them. But some are better off cause they at least played both sides. For every GM car commercial I see, I can think of 10+ for trucks. Last decent car commercial for GM I personally remember is when the Cobalt first came out and they showed all 3 (LS, LT & SS) models doing some sort of chase. What came next, the jogger running into the '90's Cutlass (Malibu commercial). Daewoo bombed out at least twice in the US, what does GM do, buy them out and bring in the Aveo? With the Cobalt and the HHR being good models, but what was the last add?
They also should have left Saturn as the "import fighter" instead, it blew up into more than it should have with SUV's and crossovers.
They also should have left Saturn as the "import fighter" instead, it blew up into more than it should have with SUV's and crossovers.
If GM should have learned from what all the foreign car companies were doing (making small cars), why did all of the foreign companies come out with SUVs or pick ups themselves? And just in time for $4 gas.
#17
At least IMO......
#18
Maybe work versions of pickups will appear once again.
#19
Everyone that wants to blame GM for their own failures has some validity in their posts. But GM didn't ruin this economy, Sub Prime Lenders and Wall Street who bought the loans f'd us. GM's problem right now is the same as Toyota's. NO ONE IS BUYING!
If you say GM is at fault for building SUV's that people wanted to buy, then you need to think about that statement and relearn supply and demand theories.
Here is another prime example of the banks/lending institutions still sticking it to us. Now they are doing it with OUR money that WE bailed them out with. While GM is cutting pay they are rewarding bad business decisions. Just food for thought.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29137662/
If you say GM is at fault for building SUV's that people wanted to buy, then you need to think about that statement and relearn supply and demand theories.
Here is another prime example of the banks/lending institutions still sticking it to us. Now they are doing it with OUR money that WE bailed them out with. While GM is cutting pay they are rewarding bad business decisions. Just food for thought.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29137662/
You can't switch a assembly line in 1 month and set supplier's and everything else up to build a completely different Vehicle. Kinda hard to go from building a Silverado to a HHR.
Only reason Toyota took "over" the market was due to lack of Quailty and cheap parts Gm used in the 90's.
#20
Everyone that wants to blame GM for their own failures has some validity in their posts. But GM didn't ruin this economy, Sub Prime Lenders and Wall Street who bought the loans f'd us. GM's problem right now is the same as Toyota's. NO ONE IS BUYING!
If you say GM is at fault for building SUV's that people wanted to buy, then you need to think about that statement and relearn supply and demand theories.
Here is another prime example of the banks/lending institutions still sticking it to us. Now they are doing it with OUR money that WE bailed them out with. While GM is cutting pay they are rewarding bad business decisions. Just food for thought.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29137662/
If you say GM is at fault for building SUV's that people wanted to buy, then you need to think about that statement and relearn supply and demand theories.
Here is another prime example of the banks/lending institutions still sticking it to us. Now they are doing it with OUR money that WE bailed them out with. While GM is cutting pay they are rewarding bad business decisions. Just food for thought.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29137662/